VACCINES, THE RISK THAT REPRESENTS TODAY. !
VACUNAS, EL RIESGO QUE REPRESENTAN HOY DIA. !
EDITORIAL ENGLISH
=================
Welcome once again
all the friends, doctors, dermatologists, people around the world, readers of
DERMAGIC EXPRESS, today once again talking about the controversial issue of
VACCINES, under the name NO-VAXX, ALWAYS SAY NEVER AGAIN.
To begin I will say once again that this is not the first time and perhaps
it will not be the last, that I speak on this subject that today has become one
of the most discussed in the world community, a subject that has REVIVED by the
ADVERSE EVENTS and DEATHS caused by VACCINES AGAINST HPV, GARDASIL and CERVARIX,
cases of AUTISM AND death caused by some VACCINES, and to "spill the drop of the
glass", THE NEXT BIRTH OF THE "NEW" VACCINE VL15 of the pharmaceutical Valneva
against the LYME DISEASE.
Firstly, the population must be divided into three groups: 1.) Those who
do not know or are unaware of the problem of VACCINES or do not care about them.
2.) The "VAXERS" those people who agree with the VACCINES. And 3.) The so-called
ANTI-VAXERS, those people who for one reason or another oppose VACCINATIONS,
individual and massive, most of them because a relative or child suffered
ADVERSE EFFECTS or DEATH by some VACCINE, or personally I was DISABLED or get
sick after some vaccination.
To give you TOTAL credibility to this post I will start by placing you the
ADVERSE EFFECTS AND DEATHS REPORTED BY THE ADVERSE EVENTS NOTIFICATION SYSTEM (VAERS)
In the United States on the MEASLES VACCINE, RUBELLA AND MUMPS, the well-known
MMR.
MMR VACCINE (MEASLES, RUBELLA and MUMPS):
==========================================
There were reported 75,000 adverse effects including:
IN GENERAL: vomiting, diarrhea, anaphylaxis, earache, nervous deafness,
diabetes, arthritis, myalgia, encephalitis, febrile seizures, pneumonia and
death; IN DETAIL:
1.) 78 deaths
2.) 85 cases of deafness
3.) 48 cases of decreased eye contact
4.) 92 cases of developmental delay
5.) 855 reported cases of autism
6.) 116 cases of intellectual disability
7.) 401 reports of speech disorders
8.) 276 reports of loss of conscience
9.) 143 cases of encephalitis
10.) 74 cases of meningitis
11.) 111 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome.
12.) 692 cases of gait disturbance (unable to walk normally)
13.) 748 cases of hypokinesia (partial or total loss of muscle movement)
14.) 653 reports of hypotonia (poor muscle tone)
15.) 4874 reports of seizures, including febrile convulsions and TONIC
clonic seizures
16.) 1576 CASES OF CELLULITIS (POTENTIALLY SERIOUS SKIN INFECTION).
And finally, in some cases, the vaccine has caused the SAME
diseases it is supposed to prevent, with the following data reported to VAERS:
17.) 147 cases of measles.
18.) 384 cases of mumps.
19.) 29 cases of rubella.
These numbers are not EXACT because the report is from 1 to 10% of
reactions, therefore they may be higher.
JAPAN BAN MMR VACCINE (MEASLES, RUBELLAS AND MUMPS):
======================================================
About this MMR VACCINE maybe you did not know that THE JAPANESE GOVERNMENT
banned it in the year 1.993 (24 years ago) after 1,800,000 children were vaccinated with 2 MMR
types and a high percentage presented signs of non-viral meningitis and other
ADVERSE REACTIONS, among which 3 CHILDREN DEAD, AND 8 WITH PERMANENT
DISABILITIES: DEAF, BLINDNESS AND LOSS OF THE CONTROL OF THE EXTREMITIES. I also
quote:
".... Of the 3,969 medical compensation claims relating to vaccines in the
last 30 years, a quarter had been made by those badly affected by the combined
measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, they say..."
In 1.999 JAPAN considered using the VACCINE again but preferred to keep
the PROHIBITION and to use the vaccines against MEASLES, MUMPS and RUBELLA
individually. The cost is higher, but it's worth it. SIDE AND DEATH effects are
minor.
GARDASIL AND CERVARIX (VACCINES AGAINST HPV):
=============================================
Of the vaccine GARSASIL and CERVARIX and its adverse effects I have
already talked to you enough and the links you have here:
1.) STOP THE GARDASIL AND CERVARIX VACCINES AGINST THE HPV, HUMAN
PAPILLOMA VIRUS.
2.) GARDASIL HPV VACCINE & MERCK LAWSUIT IN COLOMBIA, POST GARDASIL AND
CERVARIX HPV VACCINE SYNDROME.
JAPAN BANNED GARDASIL AND CERVARIX VACCINES (HPV) IN 2.013.
=========================================================
But what you perhaps did not know about the "VAXERS" side is that JAPAN a
world power PROHIBITED, "BANNED" the GARDASIL VACCINE in the year 2.013 due to
the report of approximately 2.000 SIDE EFFECTS, hundreds of which were SERIOUS .
The Japanese reported at that time: CONVULSIONS, CEREBRAL DAMAGE,
BLINDNESS, PARALYSIS, SPEECH PROBLEMS, PANCREATITIS, LOSS OF SHORT TERM SPEECH,
DEATH, AND OTHERS. And I quote again:
"... Since the government began offering girls HPV shots, 1,968 adverse
events were reported, including 358 that were evaluated as serious by a JMLHW
committee. Parents began calling the country’s health minister and furnishing
videos in which girls who had received the HPV vaccine suffered from walking
disturbances, body tics and seizures. In other cases many girls injected with
the vaccine fell to the floor, injuring their head or face and some fracturing
their jaw or teeth,”
And still this "VACCINE is sponsored in many countries as the great WONDER
to combat HPV and continues to be used by governments that maybe even knowing
the damage they cause, implement them in the population." Here we have to think
about the motivation of them to do this? money? ignorance? complicity? These
questions are left to the audience.
MASSIVE STERILIZATION IN KENYA WITH TETANUS VACCINE:
===================================================
On November 6, 2014, a "scandal" in KENYA explodes in relation to the
VACCINE against the TETANUS, where several doctors found in several studies of
this VACCINE evidence of the existence within them of HGC HORMONE (human
chorionic gonadotrophin), the which was developed by WHO in the year 1.992.
This was denounced by several Doctors under the concept that a MASSIVE
STERILIZATION was being implemented through these VACCINES, the HGC in
conjunction with traces of the tetanus vaccine would create antibodies that
would prevent pregnancy in the girls, causing a spontaneous ABORTION. Vaccine
was supplied to 2.3 million girls and women of childbearing age.
Today, September 17, 2017, the debate on this case was reopened where the
government is accused of having implemented the VACCINE in the years 2.014 and
2.015, showing that 1/3 of the vials contain HGC, a hormone associated with the
control of birth rate among girls and women between the ages of 14 and 49 years.
It is said that between 50,000 and 500,000 women and girls were sterilized
with this method. And I quote:
".... This is the greatest crime against humanity ever committed against
the women of Kenya and the most devilish attempt of social engineering .... "
THE NEW VACCINE AGAINST LYME DISEASE VL15:
==========================================
This topic and explain it to you extensively and you can read it here: NEW
VACCINE VL15 OF VALNEVA AGAINST THE LYMD DISEASE , ANOTHER FRAUD MORE?
I return to talk about this topic because I find the information that the
FDA is accelerating the step for the approval of this "NEW VACCINE" against the
LYME DISEASE or CHRONIC ERYTHEMA MIGRANS, produced by the SPIROCHETA BORRELIA
BURGDORFERI and transmitted by a TICK genus IXODES.
In case you did not know, 300,000 new cases of this disease are reported
annually in the UNITED STATES, DOUBLE cases of breast cancer and 6 times more
than cases of AIDS.
In the year 1.998 a VACCINE was approved under the name of LYMErix based
on the surface antigen OspA of BORRELIA, causal agent, which was a tremendous
disaster, said VACCINE had to be removed from the market in the year 2.002 by
the numerous secondary effects, diseases and DEATH caused by it.
Subsequent studies have determined that this OspA antigen has the ability
to "shoot" the person's immune system. OCCASIONING THE SAME DISEASE that
"SUPPOSED" will prevent the vaccine, and other autoimmune diseases such as
ARTHRITIS, LUPUS and others. REALLY the Ospa Antigen IS AN ENDOTOXIN that causes
IMMUNOSUPPRESSION and MULTISYSTEM NEUROLOGICAL DISEASES.
Here comes the big question? Was the laboratory manufacturer of this event
aware? or concealed it to earn a few bucks and quiet the NEED OF THE POPULATION
of a cure against this disease that was increasing alarming, all under the
support of the FDA.
The end result was catastrophic, you can read here THE HISTORY OF SOME VICTIMS OF THE DISEASE OF LYME, but not everything was there.
Today 2,017, 15 years after LYMErix the increase to 300,000 new cases per
year of LYME DISEASE, A French pharmaceutical called VALNEVA comes with a
"SUPPOSED" NEW VACCINE, which is nothing more than a "CLON" of the old LYMERIX
because it is also based on the OspA antigen, if this is so, there is nothing
left to think but three things:
1.) THE NEW VACCINE WILL BE ANOTHER FAILURE AND FRAUD.
2.) NEW CASES OF AFFECTED WITH MULTISYSTEM, NEUROLOGICAL AND AUTOIMMUNE
DISEASES, AND PROBABLY DEATHS WILL BE PRODUCED IN VACCINATED PEOPLE.
3.) IF IT IS APPROVED IT WILL NOT LAST A LONG TIME IN THE MARKET, MAYBE
WITH THE PROFITS COVER COST EXPENSES.
HEPATITIS B VACCINE (ENGERIX-B):
=============================
The VAERS and PubMed system between the years (1966-2003) were searched
for autoimmune conditions and the following diseases were reported following
vaccination against HEPATITIS B:
1.) ARTHRITIS.
2.) RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS.
3.) MYELITIS.
4.) OPTICAL NEURITIS.
5.) GUILLAIN BARRE SYNDROME (GBS).
6.) MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS (EM).
7.) VASCULITIS.
8.) SUDDEN CHILD DEATH.
9.) FATIGUE.
10.) TROMBOCYTOPENIA / PANCITOPENIA.
11.) GLOMERULONEFRITIS.
12.) ANAFILAXIS
13.) NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS.
14.) SYSTEMYC ERYTHEMATOUS LUPUS (LES).
15.) CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME.
16.) IDIOPATHIC TROMBOCYTOPENIC PUPURA.
17.) LICHEN PLANUS: Dermatological disease, perhaps the most reported side
effect.
Not to leave the issue unfinished comes a NEW VACCINE AGAINST HEPATITIS B
in youngsters from the age of 18 years by the pharmaceutical DYNAVAX, is called
HELIPSAV-B (TM) which is based on the surface antigen of the hepatitis virus B,
according to the studies this vaccine would be superior to the already known
ENGERIX-B (HEPTAVAX-B) because "SUPPOSED" offers greater protection, with fewer
doses (2), ENGERIX-B are three doses at 0, 1, and 6 month.
The FDA in this case just delayed the approval of said VACCINE by November
of 2,017 and would be in the market by the beginning of 2.018. THE MAIN OBSTACLE
for its approval is the side effect of the same on the HEART and the production
of HEART ATTACK, for that reason the FDA again delays the approval of the same,
hoping that the company SHOW studies after its commercialization that
demonstrate security with respect to this sensitive subject.
In case you did not know, DYNAVAX HELIPSAV-B has been rejected for
approval by the FDA on two (2) previous occasions in year 2,013 and year 2,016,
this is its third attempt. In one of them the same company abandoned on its own
account the attempted approval claiming that they were not sure of their
RELIABILITY.
This caused a fall in the DYNAVAX STOCK EXCHANGE by failing in its second
attempt to approve, and I REPEAT the reason for the delay in this approval was
that in the PREVIOUS STUDIES with this VACCINE there were 14 cases of infarct to
the myocardium.
The VACCINE has not yet been APPROVED and a profit of 290 MILLION dollars
is already projected for the year 2.026 ... Draw your conclusions.
AH1N1 FLU VACCINE (PANDEMRIX)
=============================
In Germany, a study was conducted between November 2.009 and December
2.010 to evaluate the PANDEMRIX vaccine against influenza AH1N1 and its
relationship to GUILLAIN BARRE SYNDROME and its FISHER SYNDROME variant, which
contains ASO3 adjuvant. There were reports of 351 Hospitals with 676 GB / FS
cases.
Of the 676 cases reported 30 occurred between the first 150 days after
vaccination against the AH1N1 FLU and the GLOBAL RESULT of the investigation was
that there was a higher incidence of GUILLAIN BARRE SYNDROME (GBS) and its
variant FISHER SYNDROME (FS) associated with the VACCINATION against the AH1N1
FLU with the PANDEMRIX VACCINE.
CONJUGATED VACCINES: HAEMOPHILUS INFLUENZAE TYPE B (Hib), ALONE OR WITH
OTHERS:
=====================================================================
To end this hot topic I bring you the adverse reactions AND DEATHS
reported by the VAERS system of vaccines against Haemophilus Influenzae type B (hiB):
Since June 2,012, 12,140 serious adverse events have been reported to the
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in relation to all Hib VACCINES
combined.
The majority of this number were children younger than 3 years (11,278).
Serious reactions included 471 DEATHS and such things as ANAPHYLACTIC REACTIONS,
ASTHMA, PNEUMONIA, CONVULSIONS, NON-INFECTIOUS ENCEPHALITIS, PERIFERIC
NEUROPATHY, ACUTE PANCREATITIS, GUILLAIN BARRE SYNDROME, SEPSIS, AND BRAIN
EDEMA.
ADVERSE EFFECTS BY VACCINE:
=============================
ACTHIB: (Haemophilus b Conjugate Vaccine (Tetanus Toxoid Conjugate)
approval 1.993.
=======
1.) Sensitivity.
2.) erythema.
3.) induration.
4.) fever.
5.) irritability.
6.) drowsiness.
7.) anorexia.
8.) diarrhea.
9.) vomiting.
when combined with the reconstituted DTP vaccine, adverse reactions
included:
1.) pain on palpation.
2.) erythema.
3.) induration.
4.) fever.
5.) irritability.
6.) drowsiness.
7.) anorexia.
8.) diarrhea.
9.) persistent crying.
10.) hypotensive / hypotensive episode (which is consistent with the HHE
rate observed with DTP ALONE, vaccination)
HIBERIX: (Haemophilus b Conjugate Vaccine (Tetanus Toxoid Conjugate)
approval 2.009
======
When co-administered with DTaP-HBV-IPV:
1.) REDNESS.
2.) PAIN AND SWELLING AT THE SITE OF INJECTION.
3.) FEVER.
4.) IRRITABILITY.
5.) LOSS OF APPETITE.
6.) RESTLESSNESS.
7.) DROWSINESS.
8.) DIARRHEA.
9.) VOMITING.
Postmarketing adverse events included:
1.) EXTENSIVE INFLAMMATION OF THE VACCINATED LIMB.
2.) ANAPHYLACTIC REACTIONS.
3.) ANGIOEDEMA.
4.) SEIZURES.
5.) HYPOTONIC- HYPORESPONSIVE EPISODE.
6.) SYNCOPE.
7.) APNEA.
8.) RASH.
9.) URTICARIAL.
10.) SOMNOLENCE.
PEDAVAXHIB: (Haemophilus b Conjugate Vaccine (Tetanus Toxoid Conjugate)
============
Adverse events during clinical trials INCLUDED:
1.) irritability.
2.) drowsiness.
3.) pain / pain by injection.
4.) erythema.
5.) Swollen induration.
6.) Unusual acute crying, prolonged crying (more than 4 hours).
7.) diarrhea.
8.) vomiting.
9.) crying.
10.) pain.
11.) otitis media.
12.) upper respiratory tract rash and infection
Potential adverse events may include the early onset of Hib disease and
GUILLAIN-BARRE SYNDROME; in subsequent marketing, reported adverse events
included:
1.) lymphadenopathy.
2.) angioedema.
3.) febrile convulsions.
4.) abscess at the injection site.
PENTACEL:(Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis Adsorbed,
Inactivated Poliovirus and Haemophilus b Conjugate (Tetanus Toxoid Conjugate)
Vaccine. APPROVAL: 2.008
=========
1.) Redness.
2.) swelling.
3.) sensitivity at the injection site.
4.) increase in the circumference of the arm (dose 4).
5.) fever.
6.) lethargy.
7.) inconsolable crying.
8.) irritability.
9.) episodes of hypointensive hypotonia.
10.) seizures.
11.) febrile convulsions.
12.) bronchiolitis.
13.) dehydration.
14.) pneumonia.
15.) gastroenteritis.
16.) asthma.
17.) pneumonia.
18.) encephalopathy.
19.) four deaths attributed to asphyxia.
20.) Cranioencephalic trauma.
21.) sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).
22.) neuroblastoma.
in postmarketing, reported adverse events included:
1.) cyanosis.
2.) vomiting.
3.) diarrhea.
4.) Extensive swelling of the injected limb, including swelling involving Adjacent joints.
5.) Invasive Hib disease (classified as vaccine failure).
6.) rash.
7.) urticaria.
8.) meningitis.
9.) rhinitis.
10.) viral infection.
11.) decreased appetite.
12.) drowsiness, HHE, depressed level of consciousness.
13.) screams.
14.) apnea.
15.) cough.
16.) erythema.
17.) discoloration of the skin and pallor.
In relation to the PENTACEL vaccine, the FDA reported: 775 adverse
reactions, 177 of which were considered serious, including 26 DEATHS, between
June 20, 2008 (when Pentacel was licensed) and October 31, 2009.
Deaths were attributed to SIDS (12
cases), congenital / genetic conditions, respiratory infections, positional
asphyxia, anoxic encephalopathy, cardiac arrest of undetermined etiology,
dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, two deaths of indeterminate cause, one
death without available records and two deaths with pending information .
MENHIBRIX: X (Meningococcal Groups
C and Y and Haemophilus b Tetanus Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine) APPROVAL: 2.012
==========
1.) Redness.
2.) swelling and pain at the injection site.
3.) irritability.
4. drowsiness
5.) loss of appetite.
6.) fever.
7.) syncope.
For more serious reactions, such as NERVOUS SYSTEM DISORDERS and
other serious events, the manufacturer referred to reactions reported by the use
of Hiberix instead of his own vaccine. It is not known whether MenHibrix can
cause FETAL HARM when given to a pregnant woman or if it may affect reproduction
capacity.
CONCLUSIONS:
=============
1.) The man has made great discoveries and through some of his VACCINES
such as the case of smallpox EDWARD JENNER who in 1.796 passed to History when
discovering the vaccine that put an end to that disease in ALL THE WORLD, and
whose last case was registered in SOMALIA, 1,977 in the man ALI MAALIN who also
WAS IMMORTALIZED as the last case.
2.) Great discoveries have been made regarding VACCINES many of which are
necessary to avoid EPIDEMIC, it is true, such is the case of HEPATITIS A and B.
3.) But also some vaccines have been great failures, such as the vaccine
against LYME DISEASE (LYMErix) and HPV (GARDASIL AND CERVARIX) that far from preventing
have caused more disease and deaths.
4.) Many of the VACCINES contain adjuvants such as ALUMINUM AND THIMEROSAL
(MERCURY) which are triggers of immunological reactions, and instead of
preventing, it triggers disease.
5.) Other vaccines for their BAD DESIGN, produce severe side effects and
some of them are linked to proven cases of AUTISM.
6.) The administration of the VACCINES SHOULD be in well-studied, longer
periods of time, not take a child and put 5 or 6 vaccines in a single session.
In my opinion that is ONE OF THE GREAT FAULTS.
7.) The United States court has called the so-called resolution 327 where
it orders the mandatory vaccines, discussed in Congress on May 16, 2017,
alleging the safety of vaccines and that these do not cause side effects. They
are wrong. The vaccines are necessary, it is true, but many of them can KILL you
or SICK you or your childs for ever and ever.
8.) It is your decision to TAKE THE VACCINE, but in the United States, the
government has just put in jail for 7 days a mother (Rebbeca Bredow) who refused to put several
shots to her son thinking about his health.
9.) In JAPAN, the government eliminated the mandatory of some VACCINES,
and banned others, and is one of the countries with the highest health index in
children.
10.) The Social Networks have succeeded in expanding in the world
community the current problem of VACCINES, and the rejection of the population
towards them.
11.) The most questioned VACCINE of all is the MMR against Rubella
measles, and mump, and to which it has been associated cases of AUTISM, death
and other diseases, in fact it is the most rejected today.
All this I wrote is the CRYSTAL reality, and is well supported, as always
DERMAGIC EXPRESS tells you the truth, there is no invention, read the
BIBLIOGRAPHIC references.
Greetings to all
Dr. José Lapenta
EDITORIAL ESPAÑOL
=================
Bienvenidos una vez mas todos los amigos, médicos, dermatólogos, gente alrededor del mundo, lectores del DERMAGIC EXPRESS, hoy una vez más hablando del controversial tema de las VACUNAS, bajo el nombre NO-VAXX, SIEMPRE DI: NUNCA DE NUEVO.
Para comenzar les diré una vez más, que esta no es la primera vez y quizá no será la ultima, que hablo sobre este tema que hoy día se ha convertido en uno de los más discutidos en la comunidad mundial, tema QUE HA REVIVIDO por los efectos ADVERSOS y MUERTES ocasionadas por las VACUNAS CONTRA EL VPH, GARDASIL y CERVARIX, los casos de AUTISMO Y muerte provocados por algunas VACUNAS, y para derramar la gota del vaso, EL próximo NACIMIENTO DE LA "NUEVA" VACUNA VL15 de la farmacéutica Valneva CONTRA la ENFERMEDAD DE LYME.
Primeramente hay que dividir a la población en tres grupos: 1.) Aquellos que no saben o desconocen el problema de las VACUNAS o no les interesa. 2.) Los "VAXERS" aquellas personas que están de acuerdo con la VACUNAS. Y 3.) Los llamados ANTI-VAXERS, aquellas personas que por una u otra razón se oponen a las VACUNACIONES, individuales y masivas, la mayoría de ellas porque algún familiar o hijo sufrió EFECTOS ADVERSOS o MUERTE por alguna VACUNA, o personalmente quedo INCAPACITADO luego de alguna vacunación.
Para darle TOTAL credibilidad a este post voy a comenzar colocándote los EFECTOS ADVERSOS Y MUERTES reportados por el SISTEMA DE NOTIFICACION DE EVENTOS ADVERSOS (VAERS) En los estados Unidos sobre la VACUNA CONTRA EL SARMPION, RUBEOLA Y PAROTIDITIS, la muy conocida MMR.
VACUNA MMR (SARAMPION PAROTIDIS Y RUBEOLA):
============================================
Se reportaron 75.000 mil efectos adversos que incluyen:
EN GENERAL: vómitos, diarrea, anafilaxia, dolor de oído, sordera nerviosa, diabetes, artritis, mialgia, encefalitis, convulsiones febriles, neumonía y muerte; EN DETALLE:
1.) 78 muertes
2.) 85 casos de sordera
3.) 48 casos de disminución del contacto visual
4.) 92 casos de retraso en el desarrollo
5.) 855 casos reportados de autismo
6.) 116 casos de discapacidad intelectual
7.) 401 informes de trastornos del habla
8.) 276 informes de pérdida de conciencia
9.) 143 casos de encefalitis
10.) 74 casos de meningitis
11.) 111 casos de síndrome de Guillain-Barré.
12.) 692 casos de alteración de la marcha (no poder caminar normalmente)
13.) 748 casos de hipoquinesia (pérdida parcial o total del movimiento muscular)
14.) 653 informes de hipotonía (pobre tono muscular)
15.) 4874 informes de convulsiones, incluidas las convulsiones febriles y las
convulsiones tónicas clónicas
16.) 1576 CASOS DE CELULITIS (INFECCION DE PIEL POTANCIALMENTE GRAVE).
En algunos casos, la VACUNA ha causado las mismas enfermedades que se supone que previene, con los siguientes datos informados al VAERS:
17.) 147 CASOS DE SARAMPION.
18.) 384 CASOS DE PAROTIDITIS.
19.) 29 CASOS DE RUBEOLA.
Estos números no son EXACTOS pues el reporte es del 1 al 10% de las reacciones, por lo tanto pueden ser mayores.
JAPON PROHIBE VACUNA MMR (RUBEOLA, PAROTIDITIS Y SARAMPION):
=============================================================
Sobre esta VACUNA MMR quizá no sabías que EL GOBIERNO JAPONES, la prohibió en el año 1.993 (hace 24 años) después que 1.800.000 niños fueron vacunados con 2 tipos MMR y un alto porcentaje presento signos de MENINGITIS NO VIRAL y OTRAS RECACCIONES ADVERSAS, entre las que destacan 3 NIÑOS MUERTOS, y 8 CON DISCAPACIDADES PERMANENTES: SORDERA, CEGUERA y PERDIDA DEL CONTROL DE LAS EXTREMIDADES. Además cito textualmente:
"....De las 3,969 reclamaciones de INDEMNIZACION MEDICA relacionadas con las vacunas en los últimos 30 años, una cuarta parte lo hicieron los afectados por la vacuna combinada contra el sarampión, las paperas y la rubéola..."
En 1.999 JAPON considero volver a utilizar la VACUNA pero prefirió mantener LA PROHIBICION y utilizar individualmente las VACUNAS contra SARAMPION, PAROTIDITIS Y RUBEOLA. El costo es más elevado, pero vale la pena. Los efectos SECUNDARIOS Y MUERTES son menores.
GARDASIL Y CERVARIX (VACUNAS CONTRA EL VPH):
============================================
De la vacuna GARSASIL y CERVARIX y sus efectos adversos ya te he hablado bastante y los links los tienes acá:
1.) PROHIBAN LA VACUNA GARDASIL Y CERVARIX CONTRAL EL VPH, VIRUS DEL PAILOMA HUMANO.
2.) VACUNA GARDASIL CONTRA EL VPH & MERCK DEMANDADOS EN COLOMBIA, SINDROME POST GARDASIL Y CERVARIX POST VACUNACION.
JAPON PROHIBE VACUNAS GARDASIL Y CERVARIX (VPH) EN 2.013
========================================================
Pero lo que quizá no sabias tu que te colocas del lado de los "VAXERS" es que JAPON una potencia mundial PROHIBIO, "BANEO" la VACUNA GARDASIL en el año 2.013 debido al reporte de aproximadamente 2.000 EFECTOS SECUNDARIOS, cientos de los cuales fueron GRAVES.
Reportaron los Japoneses en aquella epoca: CONVULSIONES, DAÑO CEREBRAL, CEGUERA, PARALISIS, PROBLEMAS DEL HABLA, PANCREATITIS, PERDIDA DEL HABLA A CORTO PLAZO, MUERTE y OTROS. Y vuelvo a citar textualmente
"...Desde que el gobierno comenzó a ofrecer inyecciones de VPH para niñas, se notificaron 1.968 eventos adversos, de los cuales 358 fueron evaluados como serios por un comité JMLHW. Los padres comenzaron a llamar al ministro de salud del país y le proporcionaron videos en los que las niñas que habían recibido la vacuna contra el VPH sufrían alteraciones de la marcha, tics corporales y convulsiones. En otros casos, muchas niñas a las que se les inyectó la vacuna cayeron al suelo, lesionándose la cabeza o la cara y algunas fracturándose la mandíbula o los dientes..."
Y aun asi esta "VACUNA sigue siendo patrocinada en muchos paises como la gran MARAVILLA para combatir el VPH. y sigue utilizandose por gobiernos que quiza aun sabiendo el daño que causan, las implementan en la poclacion. Aqui habria que pensar cual es la motivacion de ellos para hacer esto ? dinero ? desconocimiento? complicidad ? Estas preguntas se las dejo a la audiencia.
ESTERILIZACION MASIVA EN KENYA CON LA VACUNA CONTRA EL TETANO:
===============================================================
El 6 de noviembre de 2014 "explota" en KENYA un escándalo en relación a la VACUNA contra el TETANOS, donde varios doctores encontraron en varios estudios de esta VACUNA evidencia de la existencia dentro de ellas de la HORMONA HGC (gonadotrofina corionica humana), la cual fue desarrollada por la OMS en él año 1.992.
Esto fue denunciado por varios Doctores bajo el concepto que se estaba implementando una ESTERILIZACION MASIVA a través de estas VACUNAS, la HGC en conjunción con los rastros de la vacuna contra el tétano crearía anticuerpos que evitarían el embarazo en las niñas, provocando UN ABORTO espontaneo. La VACUNA fue suministrada a 2.3 millones de niñas y mujeres en edad fértil.
Hoy, 17 de Septiembre de 2.017 se volvió a abrir el debate sobre este caso donde se acusa al gobierno de haber implementado la VACUNA en los años 2.014 Y 2.015 exponiéndose que 1/3 de los viales contienen HGC, una hormona asociada al control de la natalidad en niñas y mujeres en edad comprendida entre 14 y 49 años de edad.
Se dice que entre 50.000 y 500.000 mil mujeres y niñas quedaron esterilizadas con este método. Y cito textualmente:
"...."Este es el mayor crimen contra la humanidad jamás cometido contra las mujeres de Kenia y el intento más diabólico de ingeniería social...."
LA NUEVA VACUNA CONTRA LA ENFERMEDAD DE LYME VL15:
====================================================
Este tema ya te lo explique ampliamente y puedes leerlo aquí: NUEVA VACUNA VL15 DE VALNEVA CONTRA LA ENFERMEDAD DE LYME, OTRO FRAUDE MÁS?
Vuelvo a hablar sobre este tema porque me encuentro con la información que LA FDA está acelerando el paso para la aprobación de esta "NUEVA VACUNA" contra la ENFERMEDAD DE LYME o ERITEMA CRONICO MIGRANS, producida por la ESPIROQUETA BORRELIA BURGDORFERI y transmitida por una GARRAPATA del género IXODES.
Por si no lo sabías se reportan anualmente en los ESTADOS UNIDOS 300.000 mil casos nuevos de esta enfermedad, EL DOBLE de los casos de cáncer de seno y 6 veces más que los casos de SIDA.
En el año 1.998 se aprobó una VACUNA bajo el nombre de LYMErix basada en el antígeno de superficie OspA de la BORRELIA, agente causal, la cual fue un tremendo desastre, dicha VACUNA tuvo que ser sacada del mercado en el año 2.002 por los innumerables efectos secundarios, enfermedades y MUERTE ocasionados por la misma.
Estudios posteriores determinaron que este antígeno OspA tiene la capacidad de "disparar" el sistema inmune de la persona OCASIONANDO LA MISMA ENFERMEDAD que "SUPUESTAMENTE" te va a evitar la vacuna, y además otras ENFERMEDADES AUTOINMUNES como ARTRITIS, LUPUS y otras, y esto se debe a que REALMENTE el Antígeno Ospa ES UNA ENDOTOXINA que ocasiona INMUNOSUPRESION y ENFERMEDADES NEUROLOGICAS MULTISISTEMICAS.
Aquí viene la gran pregunta ? Conocía el laboratorio fabricante de este evento ? o lo encubrió para ganar unos cuantos dólares y acallar la NECESIDAD DE LA POBLACION de una cura contra esta enfermedad QUE estaba aumentando alarmante, todo bajo el apoyo de la FDA.
El resultado final fue catastrófico, tú puedes leer acá LA HISTORIA DE ALGUNAS VICTIMAS DE LA ENFERMEDAD DE LYME, pero no todo quedo allí.
Hoy 2.017, 15 años después de LYMErix el aumento a 300.000 mil casos nuevos por año de la ENFERMEDAD DE LYME, Una farmacéutica Francesas llamada VALNEVA se viene con una SUPUESTA NUEVA VACUNA, la cual no es más que un "CLON" de la vieja LYMERIX pues también está basada en el antígeno OspA, si esto es así, aquí no queda otra que pensar 3 cosas:
1.) LA NUEVA VACUNA SERA OTRO FRACASO MAS.
2.) SE PRODUCIRAN NUEVOS CASOS DE AFECTADOS CON ENFERMEDADES MULTISISTEMICAS, NEUROLOGICAS Y AUTOINMUNES EN LOS VACUNADOS, Y PROBABLEMENTE MUERTES.
3.) SI ES APROBADA NO DURARA MUCHO TIEMPO EN EL MERCADO, QUIZA CON LAS GANANCIAS CUBRAN LOS GASTOS DEL COSTO.
VACUNA CONTRA LA HEPATITIS B (ENGERIX-B):
========================================
El sistema VAERS y PubMed entre los años (1966-2003) fueron buscados por condiciones autoinmunes y se reportaron las siguientes enfermedades, luego de la vacunación contra HEPATITIS B:
1.) ARTRITIS.
2.) ARTRITIS REUMATOIDE.
3.) MIELITIS.
4.) NEURITIS OPTICA.
5.) SINDROME DE GUILLAIN BARRE (SGB).
6.) ESCLEROSIS MULTIPLE (EM).
7.) VASCULITIS.
8.) MUERTE SUBITA INFANTIL.
9.) FATIGA.
10.) TROMBOCITOPENIA / PANCITOPENIA.
11.) GLOMERULONEFRITIS.
12.) ANAFILAXIS
13.) DESORDENES NEUROMUSCULARES.
14.) LUPUS ERITEMATOSO SISTEMICOL(LES).
15.) SINDROME DE FATIGA CRONICA.
16.) PUPURA TROMBOCITOPENICA IDIOPATICA.
17.) LIQUEN PLANO: Enfermedad dermatológica, quizá el efecto secundario mas reportado.Para no dejar el tema inconcluso se viene UNA NUEVA VACUNA CONTRA LA HEPATITIS B en jóvenes a partir de los 18 años por la farmacéutica DYNAVAX, se denomina HELIPSAV-B (TM) la cual ESTA BASADA EN EL ANTIGENO DE SUPERFICIE DEL VIRUS DE la hepatitis B, según los estudios esta vacuna sería superior a la ya conocida ENGERIX-B (HEPTAVAX-B) porque "SUPUESTAMENTE" ofrece una mayor protección, con menos dosis (2), ENGERIX-B son tres dosis al 0, 1, Y 6to mes.
La FDA en este caso acaba de retrasar la aprobación de dicha VACUNA para noviembre de 2.017 y estaría en el mercado para comienzos del 2.018. EL PRINCIPAL OBSTACULO para su aprobación es el efecto secundario de la misma sobre el CORAZON y la producción de INFARTO, por ello la FDA vuelve a retrasar la aprobación de la misma, esperando que la empresa MUESTRE estudios posteriores a su comercialización que demuestren seguridad con respecto a este tema delicado.
Por si no lo sabías DYNAVAX HELIPSAV-B ha sido rechazada para su aprobación por la FDA en dos (2) ocasiones previas en él año 2.013 y el año 2.016, este es su tercer intento. En uno de ellos la misma compañía abandono por su propia cuenta el intento de aprobación alegando que no estaban seguros de su CONFIABILIDAD.
Esto provoco una caída en la BOLSA DE VALORES DE DYNAVAX al fallar en su segundo intento de aprobación, Y REPITO la razón del retraso en esta aprobación fue que en que los ESTUDIOS PREVIOS con esta VACUNA HUBO 14 CASOS DE INFARTO AL MIOCARDIO.
La VACUNA todavía NO ha sido APROBADA y ya se proyecta una ganancia de 290 MILLONES DE dólares para él año 2.026... Saque usted sus conclusiones.
VACUNA CONTRA LA GRIPE AH1N1 (PANDEMRIX):
=========================================
En Alemania se hizo un estudio entre noviembre 2.009 y diciembre del 2.010 para evaluar la vacuna PANDEMRIX contra la influenza AH1N1 y su relación con el SINDROME DE GUILLAIN BARRE (GBS) Y su variante EL SINDROME DE FISHER (FS), dicha vacuna contiene el adyuvante ASO3. Hubo reportes de 351 Hospitales con 676 casos de GB / FS.
De los 676 casos reportados 30 ocurrieron entre los primero 150 días posterior a la vacunación contra la GRIPE AH1N1 Y EL RESULTADO GLOBAL de la investigación fue que hubo una mayor incidencia DE SINDROME DE GUILLAIN BARRE (GBS) y su variante SINDROME DE FISHER (FS) asociados a la VACUNACION contra la GRIPE AH1N1 con la VACUNA PANDEMRIX.
VACUNAS CONJUGADAS CONTRA HAEMOPHILUS INFLUENZAE TIPO B (Hib), SOLA O CON OTRAS:
===================================================================
Para finalizar este caliente tema te traigo las reacciones adversas Y MUERTES reportadas por el sistema VAERS de las VACUNAS contra Haemophilus Influenzae tipo B (hiB): Desde junio de 2,012, se han notificado 12.140 eventos adversos graves al Sistema de Informe de Eventos Adversos a Vacunas (VAERS) en relación con todas las VACUNAS Hib combinadas.
La mayoría de este número eran niños menores de 3 años (11,278). Las reacciones graves incluyeron 471 MUERTES y cosas tales como REACCION ANAFILACTICA, ASMA, NEUMONIA, CONVULSIONES, ENCEFALITIS NO INFECCIOSA, NEUROPATIA PERIFERICA, PANCREATITIS AGUDA, SINDROME DE GUILLAIN BARRE, SEPSIS Y EDEMA CEREBRAL.
EFECTOS ADVERSOS POR VACUNA:
==============================
ACTHIB: (HAEMOPHILUS B Y TOXOIDE TATANICO CONJUGADOS) APROBADA 1.993
=======
1.) Sensibilidad.
2.) eritema.
3.) induración.
4.) fiebre.
5.) irritabilidad.
6.) somnolencia.
7.) anorexia.
8.) diarrea.
9.) vómitos.
cuando se combinó con la vacuna DTP por reconstitución, las reacciones adversas
incluyeron:
1.) dolor a la palpación.
2.) eritema.
3.) induración.
4.) fiebre.
5.) irritabilidad.
6.) somnolencia.
7.) anorexia.
8.) diarrea.
9.) llanto persistente.
10.) episodio hipotónico / hipotensor (que es consistente con la tasa de HHE
observada con la vacunación con DTP SOLA)
HIBERIX: (Haemophilus b VACUNA CONJUGADA (ToxoidE TETANICO ConjugaDO)
apprOBADA 2.009
======
CUANDO SE CO-ADMINISTRA CON DTaP-HBV-IPV:
1.) ENROJECIMIENTO.
2.) DOLOR E HINCHAZON EN EL SITIO DE LA INYECCION.
3.) FIEBRE.
4.) IRRITABILDAD.
5.) PERDIDA DEL APETITO.
6.) INQUIETUD
7.) DESMAYO
8.) DIARREA.
9.) VOMITOS.
EVENTOS ADVERSOS POSTMERCADEO INCLUYEN:
1.) INFLAMACION EXTEBSA EN EL MIEMBRO VACUNADO.
2.) REACCIONES ANAFILACTICAS.
3.) ANGIOEDEMA.
4.) CONVULSIONES
5.) EPISODIOS HIPOTONICOS- Y DISMINUCION DE RESPUESTAS.
6.) SINCOPE.
7.) APNEA.
8.) RASH.
9.) URTICARIA.
10.) SOMNOLENCIA
PEDAVAXHIB: (HAEMOPHILUS B Y MENINGOCOCO VACUNA CONJUGADA)
============
Los eventos adversos durante los ensayos clínicos INCLUYERON:
1.) irritabilidad.
2.) somnolencia.
3.) dolor / dolor por inyección.
4.) eritema.
5.) induración hinchada.
6.) llanto inusual agudo, llanto prolongado (más de 4 horas).
7.) diarrea.
8.) vómitos.
9.) llanto.
10.) dolor.
11.) otitis media.
12.) erupción e infección de las vías respiratorias superiores
los eventos adversos potenciales pueden incluir la aparición temprana de la
enfermedad Hib y el síndrome de Guillain-Barre; en la comercialización
posterior, los eventos adversos informados incluyeron:
1.) linfadenopatía.
2.) angioedema.
3.) convulsiones febriles.
4.) absceso en el lugar de la inyección.
PENTACEL: ( VACUNA CONTRA: DIFTERIA, TETANO, PERTUSIS, POLIO Y HEAMOPHILUS (DTaP-IPV/Hib) APROBADA 2.008
==============
1.) Enrojecimiento.
2.) hinchazón.
3.) sensibilidad en el lugar de la inyección.
4.) aumento de la circunferencia del brazo (dosis 4).
5.) fiebre.
6.) letargo.
7.) llanto inconsolable.
8.) irritabilidad.
9.) episodios de hipotonía hipointensiva.
10.) convulsiones.
11.) convulsiones febriles.
12.) bronquiolitis.
13.) deshidratación.
14.) neumonía.
15.) gastroenteritis.
16.) asma.
17.) neumonía.
18.) encefalopatía.
19.) cuatro muertes atribuidas por asfixia.
20.) traumatismo craneoencefálico.
21.) síndrome de muerte súbita del lactante (SMSL).
22.) neuroblastoma.
en la postcomercialización, los eventos adversos informados incluyeron:
1.) cianosis.
2.) vómitos.
3.) diarrea.
4.) hinchazón extensa de la extremidad inyectada, incluyendo Hinchazón que
involucraba articulaciones adyacentes.
5.) enfermedad Hib invasiva (clasificada como falla de la vacuna).
6.) erupción cutánea.
7.) urticaria.
8.) meningitis.
9.) rinitis.
10.) infección viral.
11.) disminución del apetito.
12.) somnolencia, HHE, nivel de conciencia deprimido.
13.) gritos.
14.) apnea.
15.) tos.
16.) eritema.
17.) decoloración de la piel y palidez.
En relación a la vacuna PENTACEL la FDA informo: 775 reacciones adversas, 177 de
las cuales se consideraron graves, incluidas 26 MUERTES, entre el 20 de junio de
2008 (cuando Pintase tenía licencia) y el 31 de octubre de 2009.
Las muertes se
atribuyeron a SIDS (12 casos), condiciones congénitas / genéticas, infecciones
respiratorias, asfixia posicional, encefalopatía anóxica, paro cardíaco de
etiología indeterminada, miocardiopatía dilatada e hipertrófica, dos muertes de
causa indeterminada, una muerte sin registros obtenibles y dos muertes con
información pendiente.
MENHIBRIX: (VACUNA CONTRA HAEMOPHILUS B, MENINGOCOCO C y Y,Y TETANOS CONUJUGADA) APROBADA 2.012
==========
1.) Enrojecimiento.
2.) hinchazón y dolor en el lugar de la inyección.
3.) irritabilidad.
4.) somnolencia
5.) pérdida del apetito.
6.) fiebre.
7.) síncope.
Para reacciones más graves, como TRASTORNOS DEL SISTEMA NERVIOSO y otros eventos graves, el fabricante se refirió a las reacciones informadas por el uso de Hiberix en lugar de a su propia vacuna. No se sabe si MenHibrix puede causar DAÑO FETAL cuando se lo administra a una mujer embarazada o si puede afectar la capacidad de reproducción.
CONCLUSIONES:
==============
1.) El hombre ha hecho grandes descubrimientos y a través de algunas de sus VACUNAS como el caso de la Viruela EDWARD JENNER quien en 1.796 paso a la Historia al descubrir la vacuna que puso fin a esa enfermedad en TODO EL MUNDO, y cuyo último caso fue registrado en SOMALIA, 1.977 en el hombre ALI MAALIN quien también QUEDO INMORTALIZADO como el último caso.
2.) Se han hecho grandes descubrimientos en cuanto a VACUNAS muchas de las cuales son necesarias para evitar EPIDEMIAS, es cierto, tal es el caso de la HEPATITIS A Y B.
3.) Pero también algunas VACUNAS HAN SIDO GRANDES FRACASOS, como la vacuna contra la ENFERMEDAD DE LYME (LYMErix) y contra el VPH (GARDASIL Y CERVARIX) que lejos de prevenir han ocasionado mas enfermedad y muertes.
4.) Muchas de las VACUNAS contienen adyuvantes como ALUMINIO Y TIMEROSAL (MERCURIO) los cuales son desencadenantes de reacciones inmunológicas, y en lugar de prevenir, desencadena enfermedades.
5.) Otras vacunas por su MAL DISEÑO, producen efectos secundarios severos y algunas de ellas están vinculadas a probados casos de AUTISMO.
6.) La administración de las VACUNAS DEBERIA ser en espacios de tiempo bien estudiados, más prolongados, no llevar a un nino y colocarle 5 o 6 vacunas en una sola sesión. En mi opinión ese es UNO DE LOS GRANDES FALLOS.
7.) La corte de estados Unidos tiene lista la llamada resolución 327 donde ordena la obligatoriedad de las vacunas, discutida en el Congreso el 16 de Mayo 2.017 alegando la seguridad de las vacunas y que estas no ocasionan efectos secundarios. Están equivocados. SON necesarias, es cierto, pero muchas de ellas pueden MATARTE o ENFERMAN a ti o a tus hijos por siempre.
8.) Es tu decisión VACUNARTE, pero en estados unidos el gobierno acaba de poner presa por 7 días a una madre (Rebbeca Bredow) que se negó a colocarle varias vacunas a su hijo pensando en su salud.
9.) En JAPON el gobierno elimino la obligatoriedad de algunas VACUNAS, y PROHIBIO otras, y es uno de los paises con mayor indice de salud en los niños.
10.) Las Redes Sociales han logrado expandir en la comunidad mundial el problema actual de las VACUNAS, y el rechazo de la poblacion hacia ellas.
Todo esto que escribí es la CRISTALINA realidad, y está bien soportado, como siempre DERMAGIC EXPRESS te dice la verdad, no hay invento, lee las referencias BIBLIOGRAFICAS.
Saludos a Todos
Dr. José Lapenta
=======================================================================
REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRAFICAS/ BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES
=======================================================================
1.) Risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome following pandemic influenza
A(H1N1) 2009 vaccination in Germany.
2.) Clinical Features of Post-Vaccination Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) in
Korea.
3.) Lichen planus secondary to rabies vaccination.
4.) Lichen planus occurring after influenza vaccination: report of three cases
and review of the literature.
5.) Lichen planus after HBV vaccination in a child: a case report from Nepal.
6.) Lichen planus induced by hepatitis B vaccination: a new case and review of
the literature.
7.) Hepatitis B vaccination and associated oral manifestations: a non-systematic
review of literature and case reports.
8.) A case-series of adverse events, positive re-challenge of symptoms, and
events in identical twins following hepatitis B vaccination: analysis of the
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database and literature review.
9.) A one year followup of chronic arthritis following rubella and hepatitis B
vaccination based upon analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)
database.
10.) Hepatitis B vaccination and adult associated gastrointestinal reactions: a
follow-up analysis.
11.) Allergic reactions to Japanese encephalitis vaccine.
12.) The web and public confidence in MMR vaccination in Italy.
13.) Media coverage of the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and autism controversy
and its relationship to MMR immunization rates in the United States.
14.) Vaccine Adverse Events: Separating Myth from Reality.
15.) Refusal to Vaccinate Child Gets Mom Jail Time: A Deeper Analysis
16.) Why Japan banned MMR vaccine
17.) Japanese Government Continues to Ban the MMR Vaccine
18.) A mass sterilization exercise’: Kenyan doctors find anti-fertility agent in
UN tetanus vaccine
19.) Raila Odinga: Tetanus vaccination is a mass sterilization on women
20.) Infant Dies Following 5 Vaccine Doses
21.) NEW LYME VACCINE COMING SOON. CAVEAT EMPTOR––BUYER BEWARE!
22.) SIDE EFFECTS IN YOUNG GIRLS TAKE GARDASIL OUT FROM JAPANESE MARKET
23.) Vaccines do NOT cause injuries, according to House Resolution 327
24.) H. RES. 327
25.) Neurological complications of vaccination with outer surface protein A (OspA).
26.) Spirochetal Lipoproteins and Immune Evasion
27.) Does a New Hepatitis Vaccine Cause Heart Attacks?
28.) FDA extends review on Dynavax's Heplisav-B, but management remains
confident
29.) Can Hib Vaccine Cause Injury?
==================================================================
===================================================================
1.) Risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome following pandemic influenza A(H1N1) 2009
vaccination in Germany.
===================================================================
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014 Nov;23(11):1192-204. doi: 10.1002/pds.3638.
Epub 2014 May 10.
Prestel J1, Volkers P, Mentzer D, Lehmann HC, Hartung HP, Keller-Stanislawski B;
GBS Study Group.
Collaborators (370)
Gerber J, Heyden M, Klötzsch C, Linster E, Langel S, Bößenecker W, Bamberg C,
Gerlach R, Reckhardt M, Borak P, Braun H, Harzheim M, Isenhardt K, Bader P,
Glocker F, Reimers CD, Riesterer-Hemm G, Trabold R, Homberg V, Klee R, von Rosen
F, Daffertshofer M, Hofler D, Hofstadt U, Baumsteiger C, Dreger J, Stachulski F,
Harms H, Kauert A, Haas J, von Brevern M, Völzke E, Ducke F, Böhme H, Koennecke
HC, Ecke A, Koennecke HC, Bähr D, Nabavi DG, Hopmann D, Porz D, Neumayer B,
Müller T, Kitzrow M, Börnke C, Schröder A, Kowalski T, Günther J, Boeckler D,
Reinshagen A, Sarholz M, Böhm KD, Weiland T, Kuhlmann RJ, Heide W, Heider S,
Schüler O, Schepelmann K, Claus D, Kunesch E, Yaretskyy G, Spieker S, Jung S,
Spitzer C, Busch A, Schneider H, Machetanz J, Grehl H, Nolden-Koch M, Wilmsen H,
Lehmann H, Seitz R, Griese M, Schmitt HM, Dietze C, Holz J, Leinisch E, Derfuß
T, Linker R, Reinhardt FM, Krämer M, Koeppen S, Gerhard H, Bauer H, Stolze H,
Jost V, Steinmetz H, Schütz H, Böhm J, Rauer S, Klotz JM, Schneider A, Biemann
M, Blaes F, Krämer H, Guthke K, Schmidt H, Krumpolt H, Schiess D, Roth M, Fuchs
HH, Schneider E, Wohlfarth K, Müller T, Sick W, Schwandt D, Wellach I, Töpper RF,
Koehler J, Rosenkranz T, Knepel S, Duwe T, Stiller M, Rieke K, Baas H, Brunotte
P, Tümmler J, Heidenreich F, Stangel M, Stift T, Ringleb P, Kaendler S,
Humbroich K, Plöger H, Sitzer M, Dieter J, Dietz M, Eicke M, Ochs G, Güldenring
A, Hagemann G, Zinke J, Fetter M, Herath H, Escheu G, Stingele R, Berthold A,
Schmitt E, Haupt WF, Petereit HF, Limmroth V, von Giesen HJ, Kirsch B, Heckmann
JG, Beuche W, Schattenfroh C, Tampier-Pohl C, Friedl R, Oberwittler C, Schlenker
M, Trillenberg P, Abushammala A, Schabet M, Eßer M, Thümen A, Lins H, Vielhaber
S, Bayerl J, Tackenberg B, Hachgenei A, Meisenheim GK, Philipps J, Tings T,
Franz O, Jauß M, Berthele A, München TU, Hupfer W, Nagi M, Dziewas R, Kusch W,
Lobenstein S, Fischer V, Syed N, Bitsch A, Jahnke U, Allendörfer J, Dietrich W,
Görtzen A, Stark E, Wenning W, Neumann F, Petrick M, Kaiser R, Niehoff T,
Deymann R, Hartmann R, Christe W, Görlitz C, Hotz M, Buchner H, Balzer K, Braune
HJ, Kindl HJ, Leschnik O, Lohner H, Zettl U, Kiefer R, Krauth S, Hansberg T,
Matrisch H, Vetter T, Schepelmann K, Schade B, Nguento A, Fortwängler T,
Hartnack F, Neuhaus O, Wennrich M, Leopold HC, Tebben J, Polzer U, Sieb P, Huss
GP, Kuhl V, Gawlitza M, Freudenberger T, Rieder G, Schröder K, Bös M, Krüger T,
Rechlin M, Bufler J, Angerer M, Möller P, Eppinger B, Dömges F, Albrecht P,
Kotterba S, Stolz E, Schmidt N, Trottenberg T, Feige P, Hufschmidt A, Svrakova
L, Haensch CA, Kastrau F, Schmidt P, Reiners K, Weinmann E, Merkelbach S,
Bachhuber A, Hermann W, Häusler M, Toth M, Weiß BM, Stein D, Klepper J, Hirsch
T, von Moers A, Brandes H, Botsch M, Köhler C, Franke I, Kössel H, Kauffmann B,
Schwalm H, Kirschstein M, Tribukait U, Mandl M, Böhmann H, Schaetz K, Hebing B,
Steinert M, Eichholz S, von Lilien-Waldau T, Karenfort M, Kretzschmar B,
Trollmann R, Schmiedel G, Dördelmann M, Kieslich M, Mause U, Grüber C,
Korinthenberg R, Heubner G, Mattes J, Radlow U, Repp R, Klinge J, Genseke R,
Gsinn S, Gebhardt B, Papsch M, Mutlak S, Brockmann K, Koch G, Mandelkow F, v
Blanckenburg P, Bertram U, Vieker S, Peltner HU, Sander M, Shamdeen MG, Nowka S,
Koch W, Walkenhorst H, Rubens T, Westerbeck K, Rübo J, Wiater A, Pflumm K,
Bensch J, Engelhardt H, Deja M, Borte M, Tibussek D, Bosse H, Rinschen K, Härtel
C, Gaude-Wagener M, Beyer U, Pädiatrie A, Peters H, Kowalzik F, Seipelt P,
Zippel S, Pargac KN, Schobeß A, Müller W, Baethmann M, Leiz S, Gehrmann A,
Makowski C, Fiedler B, Böswald M, Weisbrod T, Kintzel K, Franz C, Feickert HJ,
Kühl PG, Schneider M, Raab K, Beyer P, Kauther KD, Reiter HL, Heubner G, Behl
ES, Trefz FK, Hoffmann HG, Buss M, Olbertz DM, Hempel L, Agricola G, Horneff G,
Augustin KS, Mihatsch W, Kurre A, Colling S, Burghard R, Soditt V, Feierfeil K,
Hornbrook D, Kellner L, Pernice W, Schirmer D, Alber M, Geerken S, Kratz M,
Köhler A, Knuf M, Repinska T, Buller M, Becker JC, Niesytto C, Skopnik H,
Borusiak P, Verbeek T, Gabler I, Winkelmann T.
Author information
1
Division of Safety of Medicinal Products and Medical Devices, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut,
Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Langen, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE:
A prospective, epidemiologic study was conducted to assess whether the 2009
pandemic influenza A(H1N1) vaccination in Germany almost exclusively using an
AS03-adjuvanted vaccine (Pandemrix) impacts the risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome
(GBS) and its variant Fisher syndrome (FS).
METHODS:
Potential cases of GBS/FS were reported by 351 participating hospitals
throughout Germany. The self-controlled case series methodology was applied to
all GBS/FS cases fulfilling the Brighton Collaboration (BC) case definition (levels
1-3 of diagnostic certainty) with symptom onset between 1 November 2009 and 30
September 2010 reported until end of December 2010.
RESULTS:
Out of 676 GBS/FS reports, in 30 cases, GBS/FS (BC levels 1-3) occurred within
150 days following influenza A(H1N1) vaccination. The relative incidence of GBS/FS
within the primary risk period (days 5-42 post-vaccination) compared with the
control period (days 43-150 post-vaccination) was 4.65 (95%CI [2.17, 9.98]).
Similar results were found when stratifying for infections within 3 weeks prior
to onset of GBS/FS and when excluding cases with additional seasonal influenza
vaccination. The overall result of temporally adjusted analyses supported the
primary finding of an increased relative incidence of GBS/FS following influenza
A(H1N1) vaccination.
CONCLUSIONS:
The results indicate an increased risk of GBS/FS in temporal association with
pandemic influenza A(H1N1) vaccination in Germany.
===================================================================
2.) Clinical Features of Post-Vaccination Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) in Korea.
==================================================================
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Jul;32(7):1154-1159. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.7.1154.
Park YS1, Lee KJ2, Kim SW2, Kim KM2, Suh BC3.
Author information
1
Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul
National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
2
Division of Epidemic Intelligence Service, Korea Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Cheongju, Korea.
3
Department of Neurology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University
School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. bcsuh@skku.edu.
Abstract
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is the most common immune-mediated
polyradiculoneuropathy and it is also the most commonly reported severe adverse
event following immunization in adults. To evaluate the results of clinical and
laboratory features of GBS after vaccination in Korea, we analyzed the claims-based
data from 2002 to 2014 using materials collected for the Advisory Committee
Vaccination Injury Compensation (ACVIC) meeting including, clinical features,
nerve conduction studies (NCSs), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) profiles, treatment,
and outcomes. Forty-eight compensated GBS cases (median age, 15 years;
interquartile range [IQR], 13-51; male:female ratio, 1:1) of 68 suspected GBS
were found following immunization and all of them with influenza immunizations
with either monovalent (n = 35) or trivalent (n = 13). Among them, 30 cases
fulfilled the Brighton criteria level 1-3 (62.5%). The median duration between
the onset of symptoms to nadir, duration of the nadir, and total admission
period were 3 (IQR, 2-7 days), 2 (IQR, 1-5 days), and 14 (IQR, 6-33 days) days,
respectively. The most frequently reported symptom was quadriparesis which was
present in 36 cases (75%) at nadir. CSF examination revealed albuminocytologic
dissociation in 25.0% and NCS was abnormal in 61.8%. After treatment, most of
them showed improvement. Clinical features were similar to typical post-infectious
GBS and there were both demyelinating and axonal forms suggesting heterogeneous
pathogenic mechanism. In order to improve the diagnostic certainty of post-vaccination
GBS, careful documentation of clinical features and timely diagnostic work-up
with follow-up studies are needed.
==========================================================================
3.) Lichen planus secondary to rabies vaccination.
==========================================================================
Dermatol Online J. 2017 Mar 15;23(3). pii: 13030/qt3hr3t4hs.
An I1, Demir V, İbiloğlu İ, Akdeniz S.
Author information
1
Department of Dermatology, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakır,
Turkey. is_an89@hotmail.com.
Abstract
Lichen planus (LP) is a papulosquamous disease withdistinctive clinical
manifestations. The etiology of LPremains unknown. Recently, numerous cases of
LPdeveloping after hepatitis B, influenza, and combined DTaP-IPV-MMR vaccine
have been described. In thisreport, we present the second case of LP after
rabiesvaccination.
==========================================================================
4.) Lichen planus occurring after influenza vaccination: report of three cases
and review of the literature.
==========================================================================
Dermatology. 2010;221(4):296-9. doi: 10.1159/000321191. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
Sato NA1, Kano Y, Shiohara T.
Author information
1
Department of Dermatology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
nrkcc0605-ao@ks.kyorin-u.ac.jp
Abstract
Although influenza vaccine is thought to be effective and safe, it occasionally
causes systemic reactions such as toxic epidermal necrolysis, bullous pemphigoid,
lichen planus (LP), etc. The period of increased risk of developing these events
was different depending on the immune responses induced by the vaccination. We
report 3 cases of LP which appeared after an influenza vaccination. Our cases
indicate that the period of increased risk of developing vaccine-related LP was
concentrated within 2 weeks after vaccination, and that the vaccine alone
represents a triggering factor necessary for immune alteration sufficient for
the development of LP. Because these adverse events tend to develop over a
predictable time course, the time of onset may give an important clue to the
diagnosis of vaccine-related diseases. We suggest that a history of recent
vaccination should be sought in all patients presenting with linear
LP.==========================================================================
5.) Lichen planus after HBV vaccination in a child: a case report from Nepal.
==========================================================================
J Dermatol. 2000 Sep;27(9):618-20.
Agrawal S1, Garg VK, Joshi A, Agarwalla A, Sah SP.
Author information
1
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health
Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
Abstract
Vaccination against hepatitis B virus has rarely been associated with lichen
planus. We report a case of this kind in a child from Nepal. A 12-year-old boy
had developed generalized itchy violaceous papules and plaques six weeks after
the second dose of hepatitis B virus vaccine. Serum HBsAg and HBeAb were
negative, but HBsAb was positive. New crops of generalized, similar eruptions
developed after the booster dose of vaccine. All the lesions resolved within
three months of systemic steroid therapy. There was no recurrence after one year
of follow up. Awareness of such an association is necessary, especially in
children, because vaccination campaigns are increasing.
==========================================================================
6.) Lichen planus induced by hepatitis B vaccination: a new case and review of
the literature.
==========================================================================
Int J Dermatol. 2004 Aug;43(8):562-4.
Calista D1, Morri M.
Author information
1
Department of Dermatology, M. Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy. calista@iol.it
Abstract
In May 1996, as part of his routine antihepatitis B (hepB) vaccination plan, a
28-year-old HbsAg-negative man, hospital worker, received his first dose (20
microg) of a recombinant vaccine (EngerixB-B, Smith Kline and Beecham, Belgium),
administered via deltoid injection. The patient was otherwise healthy and taking
no medication. Thirty days after the 2nd booster dose, several pruritic,
polygonal, purple, papules appeared on the volar aspect of the patient's wrists.
New lesions gradually spread to the arms and trunk (Fig. 1). The clinical
diagnosis of lichen planus (LP) was confirmed by histology, which revealed
hyperorthokeratosis, hypergranulosis, vacuolar degeneration of the basal layer
cells and a dense, band-like lymphocytic infiltrate in the superficial dermis.
The disease started to heal after treatment with topical clobetasol propionate
0.05% and sun exposure during the following summer. Five days after the 3rd
booster dose, in November 1996, the dermatosis relapsed on the forearms, trunk,
and legs. On that occasion, routine laboratory tests, including a complete blood
count, blood chemistry and liver function tests, were within normal limits.
Screening serologic tests for autoantibodies including antinuclear antibodies,
antidouble-stranded DNA, anti-SS-A, anti-SS-B and anti-Sm were all negative. As
a result of the inadequate levels of antihepatitis B antibodies, less than 10 IU/l
in May 1998, in a high-risk patient who was frequently exposed to blood and its
products, an additional booster dose was performed. Three days later a new
recurrence of disseminated lichen planus occurred. The patient was successfully
treated with prednisone 1 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks. There was no recurrence the
following year.
==========================================================================
7.) Hepatitis B vaccination and associated oral manifestations: a non-systematic
review of literature and case reports.
=========================================================================
Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014 Nov;4(6):829-36. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.144870.
Tarakji B1, Ashok N1, Alakeel R2, Azzeghaibi S1, Umair A1, Darwish S1, Mahmoud
R3, Elkhatat E3.
Author information
1
Department of Oral Maxillofacial Sciences, Alfarabi College of Dentistry and
Nursing, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
2
Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, King Saud University, Alfarabi
College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
3
Department of Restorative Dentistry Sciences, Alfarabi College of Dentistry and
Nursing, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract
Hepatitis B vaccine has been administered in children and adults routinely to
reduce the incidence of the disease. Even though, hepatitis B vaccine is
considered as highly safe, some adverse reactions have been reported. A
literature search was carried out in PubMed, accessed via the National Library
of Medicine PubMed interface, searching used the following keywords: Hepatitis B
vaccine and complications from 1980 to 2014. A total of 1147 articles were
obtained out of which articles, which discuss the complications occurring orally
or occurring elsewhere in the body, which have the potential to manifest orally
after hepatitis B vaccination were selected. A total of 82 articles were
identified which included 58 case series or case reports, 15 review articles, 4
cross sectional studies, 3 prospective cohort studies, one retrospective cohort
study and a case control study. After reviewing the literature, we observed that
complications seen after Hepatitis B vaccination are sudden infant death
syndrome, multiple sclerosis, chronic fatigue syndrome, idiopathic
thrombocytopenic purpura, vasculititis optic neuritis, anaphylaxis, systemic
lupus erytymatosus, lichen planus and neuro-muscular disorder. Of these
complications, some are manifested orally or have the potential to manifest
orally. Although, most of the complications are self-limiting, some are very
serious conditions, which require hospitalization with immediate medical
attention.
==========================================================================
8.) A case-series of adverse events, positive re-challenge of symptoms, and
events in identical twins following hepatitis B vaccination: analysis of the
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database and literature review.
==========================================================================
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2004 Nov-Dec;22(6):749-55.
Geier MR1, Geier DA.
Author information
1
The Genetic Centers of America, MedCon, Inc., Silver Spring, Maryland 20905,
USA. mgeier@comcast.net
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
Adverse events and positive re-challenge of symptoms reported in the scientific
literature and to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) following
hepatitis B vaccination (HBV) were examined.
METHODS:
The VAERS and PubMed (1966-2003) were searched for autoimmune conditions
including arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, myelitis, optic neuritis, multiple
sclerosis (MS), Guillain Barré Syndrome (GBS), glomerulonephritis, pancytopenia/thrombocytopenia,
fatigue, and chronic fatigue, and Systemic Lupus Erythematous (SLE) following
HBV.
RESULTS:
HBV was associated with a number of serious conditions and positive re-challenge
or significant exacerbation of symptoms following immunization. There were 415
arthritis, 166 rheumatoid arthritis, 130 myelitis, 4 SLE, 100 optic neuritis,
101 GBS, 29 glomerulonephritis, 283 pancytopenia/thrombocytopenia, and 183 MS
events reportedfollowing HBV A total of 465 positive re-challenge adverse events
were observed following adult HBV that occurred sooner and with more severity
than initial adverse event reports. A case-report of arthritis occurring in
identical twins was also identified.
CONCLUSIONS:
Evidence from biological plausibility, case-reports, case-series,
epidemiological, and now for positive re-challenge and exacerbation of symptoms,
and events in identical twins was presented. One would have to consider that
there is causal relationship between HBV and serious autoimmune disorders among
certain susceptible vaccine recipients in a defined temporal period following
immunization. In immunizing adults, the patient, with the help of their
physician, should make an informed consent decision as to whether to be
immunized or not, weighing the small risks of the adverse effects of HBV with
the risk of exposure to deadly hepatitis B virus.
==========================================================================
9.) A one year followup of chronic arthritis following rubella and hepatitis B
vaccination based upon analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)
database.
==========================================================================
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2002 Nov-Dec;20(6):767-71.
Geier DA1, Geier MR.
Author information
1
MedCon, Inc., Silver Spring, Maryland, USA. mgeier@erols.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
This analysis examined the incidence rate of chronic arthritis adverse reactions
reported following adult rubella and hepatitis B vaccinations. In this analysis,
etiologic mechanisms for chronic arthritis following adult rubella and hepatitis
B vaccines were also explored.
METHODS:
The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database was analyzed for
the incidence rate of reported cases of chronic arthritis in comparison to
Tetanus-diphtheria (Td) and tetanus toxoid adult vaccine control groups.
RESULTS:
Chronic arthritis adverse reactions following adult rubella vaccination were
primarily reported in females (female/male ratio = 3.0), at about 45 years-old,
and at a mean onset time of 10-11 days following vaccination. Chronic arthritis
adverse reactions following adult hepatitis B vaccination were also primarily
reported in females(female/male ratio = 3.5), at about 33 years-old, and with a
mean onset time of 16 days following vaccination. The incidence rates of chronic
arthritis following adult rubella and adult hepatitis B vaccinations were
statistically significantly increased, by chi 2 analysis, in comparison to the
adult vaccine control groups. The attributable risk of chronic arthritis
following adult rubella vaccine ranged from 32 to 53 and from 5.1 to 9.0
following adult hepatitis B vaccine in comparison to the adult vaccine control
groups.
CONCLUSION:
This study revealed that adult rubella and adult hepatitis B vaccines were
statistically associated with chronic arthritis which persisted for at least one
year. The etiology for these adverse reactions may involve autoimmune
mechanisms. Furthermore, potential biases in the reporting rates of adverse
reactions to VAERS were not observed.
=========================================================================
10.) Hepatitis B vaccination and adult associated gastrointestinal reactions: a
follow-up analysis.
=========================================================================
Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 Nov-Dec;49(48):1571-5.
Geier DA1, Geier MR.
Author information
1
Genetic Centers of America, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS:
Hepatitis B is the most important infectious cause of acute and chronic liver
disease. Hepatitis B vaccine, a highly purified, genetically engineered, single
antigen vaccine, has generally been accepted as a safe vaccine. In 2000, the
Institute of Medicine noted that few vaccines for any disease have been actively
monitored for adverse effects over long periods and encouraged evaluation of
active long-term monitoring studies of large populations to further evaluate the
relative safety of vaccines. The aim of this study was to accept the charge of
the 2000 Institute of Medicine Report and extend our own work to determine the
frequency of gastrointestinal adverse reactions after hepatitis B vaccination
and determine if this frequency was increased over the background rate of
gastrointestinal conditions in the U.S. adult population.
METHODOLOGY:
A retrospective examination of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)
database from July 1990 through August 1999 for hepatitis B vaccination and
associated gastrointestinal reactions was made. Additionally, as controls,
hepatitis A and rubella vaccination associated gastrointestinal adverse
reactions reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System in adults were
analyzed.
RESULTS:
Our analysis shows that the 40-year-old female population between four to eight
days after hepatitis B vaccination was at increased risk for developing
gastrointestinal reactions.
CONCLUSIONS:
Hepatitis B vaccination was statistically associated by chi 2 analysis with
gastrointestinal reactions including: hepatitis, gastrointestinal disease and
liver function test abnormalities in comparison to our vaccine control groups.
The reaction rate observed is outweighed by the benefits of the vaccine. Further
analysis is needed to determine the mechanisms by which hepatitis B vaccine is
associated with gastrointestinal reactions.
=========================================================================
11.) Allergic reactions to Japanese encephalitis vaccine.
=========================================================================
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2003 Nov;23(4):665-97.
Plesner AM1.
Author information
1
Department of Medical Officers of Health, Copenhagen County, Islands Brygge 67
DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark. apl@kbh.eli.dk
Erratum in
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2004 May;24(2):335.
Abstract
The JEV widely is used in Asian countries each year and is an important vaccine
for travelers to the East from other parts of the world. JE virus is a zoonotic
disease with natural reservoirs and cannot be eliminated. Although a declining
incidence of JE has been observed in Asia because of reduced transmission by
agricultural approaches and vaccination, the most important control measure now,
and in the future, is vaccination of humans against JE. The inactivated vaccine,
produced from infected mouse-brain-derived tissue, is the only commercially
available vaccine. There are several concerns with the use of this vaccine. It
is expensive, requires two or three doses to achieve protective efficacy, and,
in practice, requires further booster doses to maintain immunity. The apparent
increase in allergic reactions in the first part of the 1990s has set focus on
the safety of the JEV. A cheap, live attenuated SA 14-14-2 vaccine is used
almost exclusively in China and parts of Korea, but there have been no trials of
SA 14-14-2 vaccine outside JE endemic countries. The vaccine seems to be highly
efficient, and few adverse events have been observed; however, PHK cells are
used for the production of this vaccine, and these cells are not approved by the
WHO. A satisfactory cell substrate is needed. A committee under the WHO has
proposed that for the live JEV, there should be validity of the assays for
retrovirus when applied to PHK cell substrate and validity of the mouse assays
for neurovirulence. Further information should be reviewed on the long-term
follow-up of recipients of the vaccine. Several new types of vaccines have
reached the phase of clinical trials; however, studies remain to be completed.
Until a new vaccine is available, the priority of surveillance of adverse events
and the continuous reporting of such events to the users of the vaccines must be
of importance. This fact is highlighted by the possibility of the varying
frequency of adverse events with different batches over the years. The WHO
offers information and recommendations for vaccines in the EPI and issues a
series of updated papers on other vaccines that are of international public
health importance (eg, JEV). The development of alternative efficient, safe, and
appropriately priced JEVs is recommended, as is intensified surveillance of
adverse events. Prospective vaccine studies of safety may be limited because of
sample size and because rare adverse events may not be detected. Several new
initiatives have been taken to improve surveillance of adverse events to
vaccines within the past 10 years. In Japan, there is an increasing awareness of
the importance of efforts taken to improve vaccine safety, and surveillance of
adverse events and possibilities of compensation for vaccine-related injuries
are in place. In Vietnam, a database to detect adverse events after vaccination
has been established; the project involves active visits to data collectors at
the vaccination sites. Comparative studies of adverse events, such as one recent
study from Japan and the United States, are important for the evaluation of the
reporting systems. The reporting rate for JEV adverse events from Japan was
approximately one order of magnitude lower than that in the United States. Japan
had strict predefined reporting criteria and time limits for observations. If
time limits for the observation are too strict (eg, defining a possible
neurologic reaction to occur within 1 week after vaccination), later reactions
will not be included (eg, if ADEM is elicited by a vaccine, the symptoms cannot
be expected to occur until weeks after the vaccination). The passive
surveillance systems have limitations with an underreporting of adverse events,
depending on clinical seriousness, temporal proximity to vaccination, awareness
of healthcare workers, and tradition of reporting particular events. In
developed countries, surveillance of adverse events is formalized, although not
necessarily optimal. An increase in reporting would be expected when the
reporting of adverse events is mandatory. Reports have been sent to VAERS, the
Vaccine Safety Datalink Project, and the European Union Pharmacovigilance
System. A Brighton collaboration has been implemented to enhance comparability
of vaccine safety data. Public health authorities in specific countries, such as
the CDC in the United States and the National Advisory Committee in Canada,
regularly have published information on the JE situation in Asia and the
preventive measures to be taken, including information on the vaccines and
adverse reactions. The conventional recommendation is that travelers should be
vaccinated if they will spend more than 1 month in a JE endemic area or in areas
with epidemic transmission with even shorter periods. Although the risk for JE
for short-term travelers is considered small (1 case per 1 million travelers per
year), sporadic cases, including deaths, have been reported among tourists
traveling to endemic areas. Risk for travelers in rural districts in the season
of risk is considerably higher (range, 1 case per 5000 travelers to 1 case per
20,000 travelers per week). Doctors who advise travelers should be updated on
the latest JE occurrences in Asia. Updates on the JE situation can be found on
bulletins at http://www.promedmail.org or are available from the WHO or CDC. The
allergic reactions primarily described after vaccination with the inactivated
mouse-brain-derived JEV have been observed in several countries during the
1900s. Allergic reactions, including the mucocutaneous and neurologic reactions
reported after JE vaccination, may vary in frequency, and these reactions should
be evaluated meticulously yearly. This step enables recommendations, including
information on possible side effects, to be given in an optimal way.
=========================================================================
12.) The web and public confidence in MMR vaccination in Italy.
========================================================================
Vaccine. 2017 Aug 16;35(35 Pt B):4494-4498. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.029.
Epub 2017 Jul 20.
Aquino F1, Donzelli G2, De Franco E3, Privitera G1, Lopalco PL4, Carducci A2.
Author information
1
Department of Translational Research, N.T.M.S. - University of Pisa, Via Savi
10, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
2
Department of Biology - University of Pisa, Via S. Zeno 35, 56127 Pisa, Italy.
3
Division of Public Health and Nutrition - Area of Pisa, Azienda USL Toscana Nord
Ovest, Galleria Gerace 14, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
4
Department of Translational Research, N.T.M.S. - University of Pisa, Via Savi
10, 56126 Pisa, Italy. Electronic address: pierluigi.lopalco@unipi.it.
Abstract
Measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination coverage in Italy has been
decreasing starting from 2012 and, at the present, none of the Italian regions
has achieved the goal of 95% coverage target. A decision of the Court of Justice
of Rimini in March 2012 that awarded vaccine-injury compensation for a case of
autism has been indicated as a probable trigger event leading to a reduction of
vaccine confidence in Italy. The aim of the study was to explore the
relationship between MMR vaccination coverage to online search trends and social
network activity on the topic "autism and MMR vaccine", during the period
2010-2015. A significant inverse correlation was found between MMR vaccination
coverage and Internet search activity, tweets and Facebook posts. New media
might have played a role in spreading misinformation. Media monitoring could be
useful to assess the level of vaccine hesitancy and to plan and target effective
information campaigns.
=========================================================================
13.) Media coverage of the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and autism controversy
and its relationship to MMR immunization rates in the United States.
=========================================================================
Pediatrics. 2008 Apr;121(4):e836-43. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1760.
Smith MJ1, Ellenberg SS, Bell LM, Rubin DM.
Author information
1
Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. mjsmit22@louisville.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this work was to assess the association between media coverage of
the MMR-autism controversy and MMR immunization in the United States.
METHODS:
The public-use files of the National Immunization Survey were used to estimate
annual MMR coverage from 1995 to 2004. The primary outcome was selective
measles-mumps-rubella nonreceipt, that is, those children who received all
childhood immunizations except MMR. Media coverage was measured by using
LexisNexis, a comprehensive database of national and local news media. Factors
associated with MMR nonreceipt were identified by using a logistic regression
model.
RESULTS:
Selective MMR nonreceipt, occurring in as few as 0.77% of children in the 1995
cohort, rose to 2.1% in the 2000 National Immunization Survey. Children included
in the 2000 National Immunization Survey were born when the putative link
between MMR and autism surfaced in the medical literature but before any
significant media attention occurred. Selective nonreceipt was more prevalent in
private practices and unrelated to family characteristics. MMR nonreceipt
returned to baseline before sustained media coverage of the MMR-autism story
began.
CONCLUSIONS:
There was a significant increase in selective MMR nonreceipt that was temporally
associated with the publication of the original scientific literature,
suggesting a link between MMR and autism, which preceded media coverage of the
MMR-autism controversy. This finding suggests a limited influence of mainstream
media on MMR immunization in the United States.
=========================================================================
14.) Vaccine Adverse Events: Separating Myth from Reality.
=========================================================================
Spencer JP1, Trondsen Pawlowski RH1, Thomas S1.
Author information
1
Conemaugh Family Medicine Residency Program, Johnstown, PA, USA.
Abstract
Vaccines are one of the most successful medical advances in modern times. Most
vaccine-preventable illnesses are unfamiliar to modern parents. Because of this,
parents are increasingly questioning the necessity of immunizing their children,
especially because no vaccine is completely free of adverse effects or the risk
of complications. Family physicians should be aware of the risks and benefits of
recommended immunizations. Thimerosal is currently used only in multidose vials
of influenza vaccine, and exposure through vaccines is not associated with
adverse neurologic outcomes. The measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine is not
associated with autism. Vaccines are associated with local reactions, such as
pain and erythema. The rotavirus vaccine minimally increases the rate of
intussusception, whereas other vaccines minimally increase the risk of syncope.
Although immunization with the human papillomavirus vaccine is recommended for
all boys and girls, vaccination rates remain low. Physicians should guide
parents to credible resources if they are considering vaccine refusal. If a
recommended vaccine is refused, proper documentation is essential. The Vaccine
Adverse Event Reporting System and National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program
track adverse events and allow compensation for documented harms from
vaccinations
=========================================================================
15.) Refusal to Vaccinate Child Gets Mom Jail Time: A Deeper Analysis
=========================================================================
October 7th 2017 at 10:15 am
Written By: Jefferey Jaxen
Source:http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/refusal-vaccinate-child-gets-mom-jail-time-deeper-analysis
“I want to make it perfectly clear. We’re leaving here today. Dad’s picking the
child up and he’s going to be vaccinated regardless of what Mom did or didn’t
do.”
These were the words of Oakland County judge Karen McDonald during the open
minutes of the recent court room proceedings that continue to grab international
headlines. Metro Detroit’s Rebecca Bredow, the Mom, now sits in an Oakland
Country jail with a criminal record forever attached to her name. Her 9-year-old
son is now in temporary custody of his father who is ordered by the court to
bring the child up to date on the boy’s vaccination status, which will be up to
eight vaccines “…as rapidly as medically necessary.”
Unfortunately in America, the end result of cases like Bredow’s are becoming
more and more common.
Some are saying Bredow refused to vaccinate her child and is getting what she
deserved but is it really that simple? The mainstream, corporate media narrative
is attempting to paint a picture that Bredow’s case is an uncommon, one-and-done
occurrence. The narrative is also suggesting that the family court process, when
vaccination status is concerned, is a stone solid justice machine based on
'settled vaccine science.' The reality is that the judge and the court are
taking a known and dangerous medical risk with another person’s child that they
have no right to take. Do courts have the right to order an unavoidably unsafe
medical intervention like vaccination in custody cases?
At minute 3:30 Judge McDonald makes clear her forced vaccination agenda.
Joel Dorfman of Michigan for Vaccine Choice, a group that advocates for parents’
rights to refuse vaccines told the Detroit Free Press, “If this child is injured
as a result of being given eight immunizations, who do you think is going to
take care of the child? The judge?”
According to Judge McDonald, Bredow’s case is about her refusal to follow court
orders she previously agreed to. McDonald ruled Bredow was in criminal contempt
for not following a 2016 agreement to vaccinate her child. However Bredow says
that her attorney at the time signed the order and advised her not to worry
since she had filed state waivers and vaccine exemptions each year in Michigan
for her child. In Michigan, parents or guardians of children enrolled in public
and private schools are required to attend an educational session before they
are granted waivers.
Charlie Langton ✔@charlielangton
Mom goes to jail for not vaccinating her kid. But what is this case really
about? On @FOX2News - @WWJ950
3:54 PM - Oct 4, 2017
2121 Replies
2020 Retweets
1515 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Lecturing from the bench, Judge McDonald told Bredow “I understand you love your
children. But what I don’t think you understand is that your son has two
parents, and dad gets a say,” Her statement seems reasonable yet it is important
to note that Bredow has primary caregiver status. Digging deeper into the
information of the case, Judge McDonald’s recent ruling gives physical custody
of the child to the ex-husband James Horne. In the past, Child Protective
Services did an investigation on Horne and the case was confirmed as a Category
3 revealing a preponderance of evidence against him which the court knew about.
What about medical expert testimony? Although Bredow’s case didn’t involve the
testimony of an expert witness or medical professional, this tactic is often a
nonstarter in US courts. The courts don’t decide and rule on the science, their
job is to weigh the evidence. For each doctor or expert witness brave enough to
go on record against the safety of vaccines in a given case, there are many more
doctors who are will testify for them. In addition, all US health agencies and
organizations still toe the line for the false ‘safe and effective’ vaccine
narrative and refuse to factor in any new or highly relevant information that
says otherwise.
During the recent ruling, Judge McDonald appeared to be reading from a
prewritten statement when handing down her decision suggesting that she did not
factor in the day’s testimony and dialogue. If that is the case, perhaps
McDonald’s prewritten decision was in response to the attention Bredow drew to
the case by going to the media. Section 600.1715 of Michigan’s Revised
Judicature Act of 1961 states:
“If the contempt consists of the omission to perform some act or duty that is
still within the power of the person to perform, the imprisonment shall be
terminated when the person performs the act or duty or no longer has the power
to perform the act or duty…”
The “act or duty” to vaccinate Bredow’s 9-year-old child was ordered by the
court to be done by the ex-husband. In addition, Bredow no longer had the power
to perform the act or duty in question. It seems that, given the language of the
act, Bredow’s jail time was handed down as a warning and a lesson rather than a
necessary legal measure.
=======================================================================
16.) Why Japan banned MMR vaccine
=======================================================================
by JENNY HOPE, Daily Mail
source:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-17509/Why-Japan-banned-MMR-vaccine.html
Japan stopped using the MMR vaccine seven years ago - virtually the only
developed nation to turn its back on the jab.
Government health chiefs claim a four-year experiment with it has had serious
financial and human costs.
Of the 3,969 medical compensation claims relating to vaccines in the last 30
years, a quarter had been made by those badly affected by the combined measles,
mumps and rubella vaccine, they say.
The triple jab was banned in Japan in 1993 after 1.8 million children had been
given two types of MMR and a record number developed non-viral meningitis and
other adverse reactions.
Official figures show there were three deaths while eight children were left
with permanent handicaps ranging from damaged hearing and blindness to loss of
control of limbs.
The government reconsidered using MMR in 1999 but decided it was safer to keep
the ban and continue using individual vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella.
The British Department of Health said Japan had used a type of MMR which
included a strain of mumps vaccine that had particular problems and was
discontinued in the UK because of safety concerns.
The Japanese government realised there was a problem with MMR soon after its
introduction in April 1989 when vaccination was compulsory. Parents who refused
had to pay a small fine.
An analysis of vaccinations over a three-month period showed one in every 900
children was experiencing problems. This was over 2,000 times higher than the
expected rate of one child in every 100,000 to 200,000.
The ministry switched to another MMR vaccine in October 1991 but the incidence
was still high with one in 1,755 children affected. No separate record has been
kept of claims involving autism.
Tests on the spinal fluid of 125 children affected were carried out to see if
the vaccine had got into the children's nervous systems. They found one
confirmed case and two further suspected cases.
In 1993, after a public outcry fuelled by worries over the flu vaccine, the
government dropped the requirement for children to be vaccinated against measles
or rubella.
Dr Hiroki Nakatani, director of the Infectious Disease Division at Japan's
Ministry of Health and Welfare said that giving individual vaccines cost twice
as much as MMR 'but we believe it is worth it'.
In some areas parents have to pay, while in others health authorities foot the
bill.
However, he admitted the MMR scare has left its mark. With vaccination rates
low, there have been measles outbreaks which have claimed 94 lives in the last
five years.
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
=======================================================================
17.) Japanese Government Continues to Ban the MMR Vaccine
========================================================================
source:https://vactruth.com/2016/06/23/japanese-government-bans-mmr-vaccine/
For many years, controversy has surrounded the three-in-one vaccine against
measles, mumps, and rubella. Most notably, the MMR vaccine is infamous for its
disputed connection to autism, and despite the fact that it has been blamed in
vaccine courts for causing autism, vaccine supporters still deny its fault in
skyrocketing rates of autism spectrum disorder, which is at least one in 68
children, with even higher rates of diagnosis among boys. [1, 2]
However, the vaccine has other serious risks in addition to the relationship it
has with unmanageable numbers of autism in children, which has led to a ban of
this vaccine in one industrialized nation.
The Japanese government banned the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine from its
vaccination program in 1993, after a record number of children developed adverse
reactions, including meningitis, loss of limbs, and death. [3]
The MMR Vaccine’s Tragic History in Japan
The MMR vaccine was introduced in Japan in April 1989, and parents who refused
the compulsory vaccine were fined. After three months of analysis, officials
realized that one in 900 children developed adverse reactions to the vaccine, a
rate that was 2,000 times higher than the expected rate.
Officials had hoped to resolve the problem by switching to another version of
the vaccine, but the excessive amount of adverse reactions persisted, with one
in 1,755 children affected. Testing of 125 children’s spinal fluid determined
that the vaccines had entered one child’s nervous system, with two additional
suspected cases.
Four years later, in 1993, the government removed the MMR mandate against
measles and rubella. A doctor from Japan’s Ministry of Health and Welfare
admitted that the separate, individual doses of measles and rubella cost twice
as much to administer, and he defended the decision, stating, “but we believe it
is worth it.” Furthermore, a member of the health ministry also stated that the
ban has not caused an increase in deaths from measles. [4]
Japanese officials were also concerned about the MMR vaccine causing additional
cases of mumps, citing numerous studies in The Lancet. [5]
Mumps and hepatitis B vaccines are not part of the national immunization program
in Japan. [6]
What Many Parents Don’t Know About the MMR Vaccine
The list of adverse reactions to the MMR vaccine, straight from Merck’s vaccine
package inserts, is long and alarming. A shortened version of the vaccine damage
associated with the MMR vaccine includes vomiting, diarrhea, anaphylaxis, ear
pain, nerve deafness, diabetes, arthritis, myalgia, encephalitis, febrile
seizures, pneumonia, and death. [7, 8]
A search of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database shows
the following statistics from the United States: over 75,000 adverse events have
been reported from any combination of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines,
including, most notably:
78 deaths
85 cases of deafness
48 cases of decreased eye contact
92 cases of developmental delay
855 reported cases of autism
116 cases of intellectual disability
401 reports of speech disorders
276 reports of loss of consciousness
143 cases of encephalitis
74 cases of meningitis
111 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome
692 cases of gait disturbance (not being able to walk normally)
748 cases of hypokinesia (partial or complete loss of muscle movement)
653 reports of hypotonia (poor muscle tone)
4874 reports of seizures, including febrile convulsions and tonic clonic
seizures
1576 cases of cellulitis (a potentially serious skin infection)
And finally, in some cases, the vaccine has caused the very diseases it is
supposed to prevent, with the following data reported to VAERS:
147 cases of measles
384 cases of mumps
29 cases of rubella [9]
The number of adverse events following vaccination are vastly underreported, as
acknowledged by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The
National Vaccine Information Center estimates that less than one to ten percent
of adverse reactions to vaccines are reported. Many of the numbers reported
above could therefore be multiplied by one hundred to determine a more accurate
amount of adverse reactions. [10, 11]
Japan Takes a Protective Stance Against Other Vaccines, Too
The flu vaccine has also been the subject of controversy in Japan, after 100
deaths occurred from the vaccine by the end of 2009. Japan’s health ministry has
been criticized for for its cautious stance against vaccines, but so far,
government officials have wisely defended their position, citing public safety
as the paramount concern.
Finally, the Japanese government has also taken a protective stance against
vaccines on behalf of its young girls, suspending the human papilloma virus (HPV)
vaccine in 2013 after numerous cases of serious adverse events were reported,
with one report citing as many as 1,968 adverse events, 358 of which were
classified as serious.
Japanese officials were concerned about the well-being of their young citizens,
despite having invested $187 million in the program. Damage payments to only a
fraction of the victims who have suffered adverse reactions to the HPV vaccine
have reached $6 million. [12]
Additionally, since 2011, at least 38 infants have been reported to have died
after they had been vaccinated against haemophilus influenza B and streptococcus
pneumonia, according to records compiled by the health ministry in Japan.
Japanese Officials Speak Out
Japan has been criticized for being behind the times when it comes to
vaccination. Vaccine advocates claim that Japan has not kept pace with other
developed countries regarding the use of vaccines. Despite listing 110
infectious diseases in a government registry, Japan offers vaccines for only 22
of those.
Some Japanese health experts disagree, however. Hiroko Mori, a vaccine
researcher, is one of those experts. He was the former head of the infectious
disease division at Japan’s National Institute of Public Health.
He has noted that Japan has one of the lowest infant mortality rates in the
world and has advocated for fewer vaccines, stating that the country’s excellent
sanitation and nutrition has boosted children’s health.
He observed,
“Medicine is supposed to be about healing, but babies who cannot speak are being
given unnecessary shots because parents are scared. Children are losing their
ability to heal naturally.
There are so many people who have suffered side effects. All we are asking is to
establish the right to say ‘no.’ The right to choose should be recognized as a
fundamental human right.”
Tetsuo Nakayama, Dean of Kitasato University’s Graduate School of Infection
Control Sciences, is an expert who supports vaccines, but he, too, acknowledges
the risks of vaccination, stating that:
“There is no guarantee that your child will not be that one out of 1,000. You
have to compare the risks between the side effects and what will happen if you
are infected with the disease naturally.
Under the existing law, the decision to vaccinate your child or not is basically
left up to the parents, but there is not enough information out there for them
to make an informed decision.”
Masako Koga, a former representative of the Consumers Union of Japan, has shared
his concerns about the ulterior motives behind mass vaccination programs:
“Vaccines should only be given to those who need them but that is not happening.
The global industry is being driven by a strategy that promotes VPD [vaccine
preventable diseases].
We must put a stop to it. Vaccines have close ties to money. From development to
circulation to research on side effects, there are a lot of vested interests
involved.”
He also summarized what motivates many parents’ decisions not to vaccinate their
children:
“There is no knowing who will suffer side effects as a result of vaccination.
[Proponents of vaccination] say the chance of suffering a side effect is 1 in a
million. For parents, however, that one is everything.”
Conclusion
Japanese officials have made decisions that value the health and safety of their
citizens when they have removed vaccines with dangerous side effects from their
national vaccination program.
Japan boasts a low infant mortality rate, despite — or perhaps because of —
mandating only a fraction of the vaccines required by other developed countries,
including the United States.
If you wish to learn more about the harmful ingredients in vaccines or the
potential adverse reactions, we have compiled an easy-to-navigate list of
vaccine package inserts from the manufacturers that you can view or download
here.
Has your child suffered an adverse reaction to the MMR vaccine or the HPV
vaccine, both of which have been removed from Japan’s national vaccination
program? If so, please share your story in our comment section below.
=======================================================================
18.) A mass sterilization exercise’: Kenyan doctors find anti-fertility agent in
UN tetanus vaccine
======================================================================
Thu Nov 6, 2014 - 2:29 pm EST
Autthor: Steve Weatherbe
Source:https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/a-mass-sterilization-exercise-kenyan-doctors-find-anti-fertility-agent-in-u
UPDATE (Nov. 12): Kenya's government has launched an investigation into the
Catholic Church's allegations. See follow up article here.
Kenya’s Catholic bishops are charging two United Nations organizations with
sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus
inoculation program sponsored by the Kenyan government.
According to a statement released Tuesday by the Kenya Catholic Doctors
Association, the organization has found an antigen that causes miscarriages in a
vaccine being administered to 2.3 million girls and women by the World Health
Organization and UNICEF. Priests throughout Kenya reportedly are advising their
congregations to refuse the vaccine.
“We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They
tested positive for the HCG antigen,” Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical
Centre in Nairobi told LifeSiteNews. “They were all laced with HCG.”
Dr. Ngare, spokesman for the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, stated in a
bulletin released November 4, “This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO
campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated
forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility
regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before
the third round of immunization but was ignored.”
But the government says the vaccine is safe. Health Minister James Macharia even
told the BBC, “I would recommend my own daughter and wife to take it because I
entirely 100% agree with it and have confidence it has no adverse health
effects.”
And Dr. Collins Tabu, head of the Health Ministry’s immunization branch, told
the Kenyan Nation, that “there is no other additive in the vaccine other than
the tetanus antigen.”
Tabu said the same vaccine has been used for 30 years in Kenya. Moreover, “there
are women who were vaccinated in October 2013 and March this year who are
expectant. Therefore we deny that the vaccines are laced with contraceptives.”
Newspaper stories also report women getting pregnant after being vaccinated.
Responds Dr. Ngare: “Either we are lying or the government is lying. But ask
yourself, ‘What reason do the Catholic doctors have for lying?’” Dr. Ngare
added: “The Catholic Church has been here in Kenya providing health care and
vaccinating for 100 years for longer than Kenya has existed as a country.”
Dr. Ngare told LifeSiteNews that several things alerted doctors in the Church’s
far-flung medical system of 54 hospitals, 83 health centres, and 17 medical and
nursing schools to the possibility the anti-tetanus campaign was secretly an
anti-fertility campaign.
Why, they ask does it involve an unprecedented five shots (or “jabs” as they are
known, in Kenya) over more than two years and why is it applied only to women of
child-bearing years, and why is it not being conducted without the usual fanfare
of government publicity?
“Usually we give a series three shots over two to three years, we give it anyone
who comes into the clinic with an open wound, men, women or children.” said Dr.
Ngare. “If this is intended to inoculate children in the womb, why give it to
girls starting at 15 years? You cannot get married till you are 18.” The usual
way to vaccinate children is to wait till they are six weeks old.”
But it is the five-vaccination regime that is most alarming. “The only time
tetanus vaccine has been given in five doses is when it is used as a carrier in
fertility regulating vaccines laced with the pregnancy hormone, Human Chorionic
Gonadotropin (HCG) developed by WHO in 1992.”
It is HCG that has been found in all six samples sent to the University of
Nairobi medical laboratory and another in South Africa. The bishops and doctors
warn that injecting women with HCG , which mimics a natural hormone produced by
pregnant women, causes them to develop antibodies against it. When they do get
pregnant, and produce their own version of HCG, it triggers the production of
antibodies that cause a miscarriage.
“We knew that the last time this vaccination with five injections has been used
was in Mexico in 1993 and Nicaragua and the Philippines in 1994,” said Dr. Ngare.
“It didn’t cause miscarriages till three years later,” which is why, he added,
the counterclaims that women who got the vaccination recently and then got
pregnant are meaningless.
Ngare said WHO tried to bring the same anti-fertility program into Kenya in the
1990s. “We alerted the government and it stopped the vaccination. But this time
they haven’t done so.”
Ngare also contrasted the secrecy of this campaign with the usual fanfare
accompanying national vaccination efforts. “They usually bring all the
stakeholders together three months before the campaign, like they did with polio
a little while ago. And they use staff in all the centres to give out the
vaccine.” But with this anti-tetanus campaign, “only a few operatives from the
government are allowed to give it out. They come with a police escort. They take
it away with them when they are finished. Why not leave it with the local
medical staff to administer?”
Brian Clowes of Human Life International in Virginia told LifeSite News that WHO
was not involved in the Nicaragua, Mexican and Philippines campaigns. “They try
to maintain a spotless record. They let organizations like United Nations
Population Fund and USAID do the dirty work.”
In the previous cases, said Clowes, the vaccinators insisted their product was
pure until it was shown not to be. Then they claimed the positive tests for HCG
were isolated, accidental contaminations in the manufacturing process.
LifeSiteNews has obtained a UN report on an August 1992 meeting at its world
headquarters in Geneva of 10 scientists from “Australia, Europe, India and the
U.S.A” and 10 “women’s health advocates” from around the world, to discuss the
use of “fertility regulating vaccines.” It describes the “anti-Human Chorionic
Gonadotropin vaccine” as the most advanced.
One million Kenyan women and girls have been vaccinated so far with another 1.3
million to go. The vaccination is targeting women, according to the government,
in order to inoculate their children in the womb against tetanus as well. The
government says 550 children die of tetanus yearly.
In covering the contest of words the pro-government Nation found plenty of women
who had been vaccinated and were now pregnant, even one who was the wife of a
former Catholic priest who left the Church to marry. The paper ignored Kenya’s
reliance on the Catholic medical system, while setting the bishops’ stand in a
questionable historical context of irrational responses “largely based on
religious beliefs,” the more recent murder of vaccination teams in Nigeria, and
even of CIA conspiracy theories.
Why would the UN want to suppress the population in developing countries?
“Racism,” is Brian Clowes’ first explanation. “Also, the developed countries
want to get hold of their natural resources. And lately, there is the whole
bogus global warming thing.”
Dr. Ngare said it was the Catholic Church’s hope that the government could have
resolved the matter quietly by testing the vaccine. “But the government has
chosen to be combative,” forcing Kenya’s bishops and Catholic doctors to go
public.
WHO’s Kenyan office and several WHO media contacts in Washington, D.C. failed to
respond to LifeSiteNews enquiries over a 24-hour period.
=======================================================================
19.) Raila Odinga: Tetanus vaccination is a mass sterilization on women
=======================================================================
Source:https://www.standardmedia.co.ke/article/2001254261/raila-odinga-tetanus-vaccination-is-a-mass-sterilization-on-women
Published Tue, September 12th 2017 at 00:00, Updated September 11th 2017 at
22:43 GMT +3
Opposition chief Raila Odinga has reignited the tetanus vaccination debate,
claiming it was a State-sponsored tool for mass sterilisation. Raila, in rare
support for the Catholic Church which at some point opposed the vaccine, accused
the Government of what he termed 'State-sponsored infertility in women'. In
January 2014 and 2015, the Catholic bishops vehemently opposed the vaccine,
claiming that one-third of the vials tested contained a hormone linked to birth
control. The church claimed that the vaccine was targeting women of
child-bearing age and that it contained elements that prevented them from
conceiving. Raila seems to be reading from a similar script, claiming that
multiple results from health experts had confirmed that the tetanus vaccine used
in the immunisation exercise triggered infertility in women aged between 14 and
49. Forced practice "Sterilisation without full, free, and informed consent
globally is an involuntary, coercive, and/or forced practice and is a violation
of fundamental human rights," said Raila. The National Super Alliance (NASA)
leader demanded that the Government provide a complete list of all those who
took part in the vaccination, apologise to them, and explain how it intends to
reverse the damage. He said should NASA form the next government, it will set up
a task force to establish the vaccine's victims, recommend appropriate
compensation for them, assign responsibility, and initiate ways of reversing the
damage. "This is the greatest crime against humanity ever committed against the
women of Kenya and the most diabolical attempt at social engineering. No one can
tell the worth of a woman's fertility or sterility," said Raila. Growing
populations He said that as a result of the administration of the vaccine,
thousands of girls and women aged between 14 and 49 from the fastest growing
populations in the country will not have children because of what he described
as 'State-sponsored sterilisation'. "Based on results that are now available to
us, it is clear that the tetanus vaccination is one of the most callous human
rights abuses committed against innocent girls and women in Kenya," he said.
=======================================================================
20.) Infant Dies Following 5 Vaccine Doses
=======================================================================
Source:https://vactruth.com/2015/09/05/infant-dies-after-5-vaccine-doses/
Life after losing a loved one to vaccines is very painful. With a heavy heart,
we share Sebastian Ryan Morley’s story. He was a healthy boy whose life ended
after routine vaccinations. Sebastian’s mother and grandmother have worked many
years in both the veterinary and human healthcare fields. What they were taught
in school led them to believe vaccines were safe, but now they will never
vaccinate again. We thank his family for coming forward and sharing very
important information the public isn’t usually made aware of.
Sebastian’s grandmother, Valerie Murfin, shared:
“On December 11, 2002, when my grandson Sebastian was seven months old, he was
taken in for his six month well child checkup. My daughter Natasha, who is his
mother, was not bullied into getting him vaccinated, she was just following what
she thought was good advice, what we both thought was good advice at one time.
During this visit, Sebastian received the vaccines for DTaP, hepatitis B, and
HiB. This is five vaccine doses.
Sebastian began vomiting two days later and suffered jaundice. After turning
yellow around his mouth on 12-15-02, his mom took him to the doctor because he
became very lethargic. She was begging for him not to die on the drive to the
doctor’s office. They admitted him to St. Peter Hospital, in Olympia, where he
stayed for two days.
Tests were run and it was found that Sebastian’s liver was failing. After an
ultrasound showed his liver stopped swelling, they allowed him to be discharged,
but warned my daughter not to let him bump his head or anything, because he
could bleed out.
Before being discharged, his doctor did more blood work and told my daughter
that she would call her, and that they assumed Sebastian had hepatitis C
somehow. This was six days after the vaccines were given to him, on 12-17-02.”
Sebastian’s Brain Swelled and His Organs Shut Down
“That phone call came in on 12-20-15 and the news made my daughter aware it was
urgent. Sebastian was rushed to the ER at Seattle Children’s Hospital. This is
where he stayed and suffered, for more than a month.
Towards the end of his stay, his eyes were no longer responsive and one swelled
up horribly; his choke reflex was gone. I think his little brain had had enough
of all the additional chemicals he received while in the hospital. Sebastian’s
brain had swelled outside of his soft spot, they had no more hope for him, and
they wanted to turn off the machines.
My daughter came out of that room, looked at me and said, ‘Don’t let them kill
my baby, Mom.’ I had to tell her he was already gone. I watched the light die in
my daughter’s eyes.
They did unplug him. He died in his mom and dad’s arms. He died on January 22,
2003, at just 8 ½ months old. Forty-two days after that well child visit,
multiple organs of his shut down and his little body couldn’t fight anymore.
My most helpless moment in my life was when I had seen the ultrasound of
Sebastian’s brain. By this time, all of his organs were shutting down. They had
him in a medically-induced coma for about the last five days. The first three
days, they would let him wake up. The last two days, he stopped waking up, even
when coming out of the anesthesia.
Ultimately, if he hadn’t had the vaccines, none of this would have happened.
My daughter did question the vaccines with the doctor that gave them and her
initial response was that they just never see that. Although Sebastian’s doctor
later on was more supportive of the fact that vaccines could not be ruled out.
His cause of death listed on his death certificate is ‘Fulminant Liver Failure
of Unknown Etiology,’ though the pathologist stated clearly when he wrote,
‘Because this child was vaccinated less than 24 hours prior to onset of illness,
we can NOT rule out the vaccines as causative.’
This is as close anyone gets to admission that the vaccines were responsible.”
Vaccines Were The Only Plausible Cause Of Sebastian’s Liver Failure
“In the days he was in the in the pediatric ICU at the hospital, they did every
test they could at the time. There was no physiological or environmental reason
for his liver failing. I kept saying in the hospital, he was just vaccinated, to
look into the vaccines, but hospital staff did not make the connection.
After Sebastian got sick and was taken to the hospital, that was when my
daughter also made the vaccine connection; I made sure she was aware. Even the
hospital doctors kept saying vaccine reactions never happen. If I weren’t so
vocal about it, they wouldn’t have put the vaccines into the equation.
His pediatrician, who actually worked with him, has been very helpful. She felt
it was important enough to report Sebastian’s reactions to the Vaccine Adverse
Reaction Reporting System (VAERS).
We appreciated her acknowledging what happened to my grandson but Sebastian’s
passing has not stopped her from vaccinating other children.
On Sebastian’s VAERS report, some things were reported inaccurately. His age
wasn’t listed correctly; he was seven months old when he received the six month
vaccines. We tried fixing the discrepancies in the report, but we were not able
to get anyone who would correct them.
Considering most parents and doctors have never reported a reaction to VAERS,
due to not being informed and doctors not being enforced to report reactions,
mistakes can occur due to being unfamiliar with the process and sometimes, the
mistakes occur on the VAERS end, because reps don’t list the information
provided correctly.
It is hard to read this. Knowing how Sebastian suffered from the vaccines is why
my family will not vaccinate further.”
VAERS
Sebastian Became More Sick After Each Hepatitis B Vaccine
“When I was in the hospital while Sebastian was there, I overheard two nurses
talking in the hall. One nurse was from the pediatric ICU, where Sebastian was,
and the other nurse was from the neonatal unit, where the preemies are.
The nurse from the neonatal unit said to the other, ‘Well, we just vaccinated
all the babies, I hope we have beds open,’ meaning these premature babies that
were doing fine in the neonatal unit were just vaccinated and the neonatal nurse
was saying to the pediatric ICU nurse that they hope they have beds open because
these babies are now needing to be put on respirators, since they are now in
critical care. Because of the hepatitis B vaccine just given to them, now the
babies aren’t doing well anymore. Doctors and nurses are more aware of vaccine
injuries than they lead you to believe.
My daughter is not able to be the champion for Sebastian as I am. She is firmly
against any vaccines, as you can imagine, but in 2003, she was so vilified. She
cheers me on in our fight. We didn’t know about the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program until four years after Sebastian passed away. The deadline
to file was two years after he passed away, so it was too late for us to file a
claim.
My daughter found out she was pregnant the day after Sebastian’s funeral. She
had a baby girl who will be 12 in September 2015. Sebastian’s sister has never
been vaccinated and is completely healthy.
Since this happened, my daughter did still see the same pediatrician after
having our granddaughter, but she never pushed my daughter to vaccinate her.
When my granddaughter was about three years old, because of a change in
insurance, this forced my daughter to change pediatricians as well. She does
love and miss Dr. O’Leary and would probably still see her to this day, if she
had the choice, because she did not ever pressure her to vaccinate again.
Even though she was the one who vaccinated Sebastian leading to his passing,
this doctor acknowledged his death and respected my daughter’s choice as a
mother to not vaccinate further. It was important she had a doctor who
understood why she no longer wanted to vaccinate.
We believe it was the third hepatitis B vaccine that was the cause of
Sebastian’s health decline. After each set of hepatitis B-containing vaccines,
Sebastian got more and more sick. After his first hep B shot was given two days
after birth, he got diarrhea and had a fever. He wouldn’t take the breast milk
and he got dehydrated. At three and four days old, my daughter was devastated as
a new mom who had to feed him formula the first week.
After Sebastian received his second hepatitis B vaccine, along with the other
two month vaccines, his mom had gone to Six Flags as a treat from her friends
and Sebastian’s dad called her saying he was very lethargic and had a fever.
Sebastian’s dad Jeff gave him medicine and watched him like a hawk, as he
seemingly got better.
Then his last set of shots given contained the hepatitis B vaccine and his liver
shut down.
The reason we also think the hep B vaccine played a big part in this is because
I can’t be vaccinated, because my immune system mimics the disease when
vaccinated to prevent it. I think Sebastian may have gotten this trait from me.
His immune system saw hepatitis and killed his liver.
I have read studies since this happened, involving mice, which show this can
happen. I spent three years in allergy treatment and through this process, my
immunologist discovered my immune system issues. After three years, he finally
admitted there was no way to fix my allergies.
In my family, I have a brother with Crohn’s disease and two cousins with lupus;
my mother has immune-mediated kidney disease. I have an aunt with rheumatoid
arthritis. All of us were vaccinated in the past. Vaccines are clearly not great
for everybody. Physicians ask you about familial heart disease, diabetes … why
not immune system issues that may be contraindicated for an immune system
stimulant?”
Sebastian’s Story Has Never Made the News
“This is not the type of story any vaccine supporter, which mainstream media
serves, will allow out. My point is, until you have a reaction close to you,
until it hits you in the face, you want to believe that those in power have your
best interest at heart.
If your doctor’s intake money is getting cut by the insurance company for not
following standardized prophylactic treatments, and your sales rep is pressuring
you into buying a cheap vaccine, you buy in bulk and everyone gets vaccinated.
If you don’t vaccinate, your doctor’s bottom line is affected. If your doctor
fails to get a good family history, on any disease in your family, and then
pushes vaccines as 100 percent safe and effective, then perhaps your doctor
doesn’t have your best interest in mind. This is a major income for all
involved.”
Human Vaccines Are Just As Harmful As Pet Vaccines
“I worked in animal medicine for 26 years, I gave thousands of vaccines to pets
and I knew vaccines were causing many problems. I had been gathering doubts
about vaccines in that field for years, which led me to leave the day practice I
worked at and go into a specialty field, where vaccines were not required.
At the vet clinic I worked for, I had serious issues with the way Pfizer handled
their sale; right away, they misrepresented themselves, trying to sell us pet
vaccines. In the 1990s, dogs received what I call the alphabet shot (DHLPPC) for
distemper, hepatitis, leptospirosis, parainfluenza, parvovirus, and coronavirus.
About 85-90 percent of smaller dogs under 20 pounds reacted to the leptospirosis
vaccine. These dogs were having many types of reactions, some life-threatening,
lifelong, and a few died within hours. Bichon Frises, little white furry dogs,
are notorious for dropping dead after vaccination and a lot of Bichon Frise
owners and breeders won’t vaccinate their dogs.
So many dogs get the diseases they are vaccinated for. The fact that so many
dogs reacted was a clue. Back then, most people still had bigger dogs. In the
1990s, there was a shift to the smaller house dogs and that made the incidence
of vaccine reactions go up.
I asked the Pfizer rep, ‘Wouldn’t it be prudent to remove the leptospirosis from
the vaccine?’ He answered that it was not cost effective to remove the
ingredient. I had been gathering doubts about vaccines in that field for a long
time, but this really opened my eyes.
After the Pfizer rep said it wasn’t cost effective to remove leptospirosis,
(which is stupid really, in my humble opinion, because you just don’t put that
ingredient in since it was causing so much harm in these pets), I asked the rep
what Pfizer recommended. His answer was to give a high-dose steroid (their
high-priced product, another money maker), five minutes before the vaccine.
They expected us to suppress the immune system with the steroid Solu-Medrol®, to
then immediately turn around and stimulate it with the vaccine. That didn’t even
make medical sense. As I said before, that conversation was an eye opener. That
guy must have hated me because I began questioning every vaccine they rolled
out.
The rabies vaccine is the worst. It was causing many health problems, including
immune system problems and gut problems and I witnessed some dogs would just
drop dead on the table after they received the rabies vaccine.
I also witnessed cats having a huge incidence of injection site carcinomas. On
the back of the shoulders where we injected them, horrible tumors would develop.
Even if surgery was performed, ultimately this still killed the cats, a process
I’ve seen take two years. I brought this up to the vaccine rep because I was
concerned about what I was observing. The answer to that from the rep was to
vaccinate low on the leg, marking which vaccine and which leg was injected. That
way, if a tumor developed, you can amputate.
At the time, the feline leukemia vaccine seemed to be the culprit. I believe now
that the vaccine manufacturers were aware then that all of the vaccines could be
problematic. In general, any of the vaccines could cause this and they don’t
test them for causing cancer; now I see why, so they can’t be blamed when they
cause cancer.
If the companies are so into making money that they don’t care about their
patients, it doesn’t make sense to use their products. Due to what I was
learning and the vaccine reactions I was witnessing, I left that practice to go
into a specialty field, where vaccines were not required. I have other stories,
but that was my light bulb moment. Regarding human vaccines being safer, I just
really believed that human medicine HAD to be different and safer, but I was
wrong.”
Our Family Will Never Vaccinate Again
“When I left, I started working at Washington State University (WSU) in Pullman,
WA, in their Veterinary Teaching Hospital’s ICU, working with fourth year
students on practical emergency and critical care.This was years before
Sebastian was even born. It was a six hour drive from where my kids lived. I
moved back to Seattle after Sebastian died. I remained in specialty medicine
where I finished my career in internal medicine. Ironically, a high percentage
of our patients suffered from vaccine-related immune-mediated disease.
My daughter also worked in the same veterinary clinic I did. She stayed in the
day practice a while longer and she was working there when Sebastian was harmed.
Sadly, I guess I didn’t really convey the problems I saw in vaccines then. I
really believed that human medicine HAD to have more safety measures than
veterinary medicine.
I always wondered if I had yelled louder about the dangers of vaccinating, would
things be different? My daughter assures me that she trusted her doctor and
would have followed the recommendations anyway. My family will never vaccinate
anyone under our care.
My daughter left the field of veterinary medicine, too. She now works in the
field of human medicine and is the medical assistant for a doctor in a foot and
ankle clinic. She also doesn’t have to vaccinate. Since Sebastian passed away,
my daughter has always been up front with her employers, that she won’t
vaccinate patients and she discloses all information to patients, if her
practice gave vaccines.
Despite their differences of opinion, even with her knowledge about the harm
these vaccines are causing, she loves the doctor she is working with, even
though he is still a vaccine person, though not as rigid as he once was. She
calls this ‘little steps,’ I think.
Prior to me becoming disabled after I broke my back in 2008, I had subbed for a
friend who went on vacation. At the one day clinic I subbed in, I gave complete
disclosure on vaccines, letting them know I won’t give them. They didn’t invite
me back. I never went back to a day practice other than that.
Nowadays, my job is sharing Sebastian’s story, and working against the mandates
we know will be revisiting us in our state of Washington. It takes a huge amount
of my time. We have to speak for those who can’t anymore. In this, we gather.
I am thankful to Sallie O. Elkordy, Host of ‘The Mary and Sallie Show,’ who
allowed me to share Sebastian’s story and to let people know what is happening
to children and pets after vaccination.
Please, do your research, folks; know your risk of infection for said disease,
if you want to vaccinate. Our immune systems work best when they are not
chemically modified. I encourage folks to share my grandson’s story. It is the
only thing that helps us come to terms with his death.
I gave Sebastian that first sink bath; it’s my favorite picture of him. Oh, if I
could, I would give him a head noogie, because he would have just turned 13 this
year and giving grandma a hug just isn’t cool when you’re 13.
In all seriousness, we miss him so much. Not a day goes by that he is not in our
thoughts. The tears still fall. We would give anything to see what his 13
year-old self would have been.
It was a very difficult thing for us to go through, losing him the way we did.
Like my daughter says, it’s been like a movie that you cannot turn off or
rewrite the script. The sequel, I hope, sheds light on the other side, and stops
the Vaccine Holocaust. We had the bad luck to win the vaccine lottery; with any
decency in the country, countless others won’t be forced to.
If just one person chooses to inform themselves, if just one more person wakes
up, if one family is saved from this hole carved out of our lives, then it gives
us some peace. It gives this little man a voice, when he had been silenced for
so long.
We love you, Sebastian. You will not be forgotten.
Love, Your Grandma,
Valerie Murfin”
In Our Hearts He Will Be Remembered
His mother Natasha wrote:
“I miss my little monkey everyday. Some days are easier than others but it’s
still a very hard thing to swallow. My son’s life was like a very short movie.
And just like that, it was over, with the saddest ending. I don’t want this to
happen to anyone else.”
=======================================================================
21.) NEW LYME VACCINE COMING SOON. CAVEAT EMPTOR––BUYER BEWARE!
Published on Published onAugust 4, 2017
=======================================================================
Author: Lori Dennis, MA,RP
Registered Psychotherapist, Speaker, Author of Lyme Madness
Source:https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/new-lyme-vaccine-coming-soon-caveat-emptorbuyer-lori-dennis-ma-rp/
In the Tech and Science section of Newsweek, July 25, 2017, the headline reads:
"Lyme disease vaccine on fast track for FDA approval."http://www.newsweek.com/lyme-disease-vaccine-valneva-fda-approva-641796
Those of us in the Lyme world know that this is anything but good news. In fact,
for those of us ‘in the know’, it's absolutely terrifying.
Why? you may ask. Why wouldn’t we want a vaccine to prevent this illness? After
all, we’ve been hearing just how life-altering and debilitating this disease can
be. Wouldn’t a vaccine protect us from this potential fate?
I will give you five key reasons to consider why a Lyme vaccine is something to
stay very far away from. I urge you to do your own homework and give it great
consideration before you or your loved ones choose to let your doctor provide
you this now ‘fast-tracked’, soon to be available Lyme vaccine.
And please – when you do your homework, do NOT fall for the long-held,
propaganda-driven ‘Lyme loonies’, anti-vaxxer’, ‘anti-science’ argument. This is
nothing more than a false and desperate, shall we say childish, position that
the powers that be continue to mount for their own personal benefit driven by
profit and greed, and certainly not public good. Please don’t fall for these
victim blaming, gas lighting, insidious behaviours. Be smarter than that. It may
be too late for the millions suffering from this life altering illness … but
it’s not too late for you.
Here are the five key reasons why you should NOT get the new Lyme vaccine:
YOU CANNOT TRUST THE ‘LYME CABAL’
We in the Lyme world have a long list of reasons not to trust that the medical
‘powers-that-be’ on the subject of Lyme disease. For forty years, they have been
telling us that ‘there is no such thing as chronic Lyme, that there are no ticks
here, that you couldn’t be this sick, we don’t know what’s wrong with you but it
isn’t Lyme, it’s probably just ‘all in your head’. Around the world, in 80
countries and on every continent, people are chronically ill with Lyme disease
and most cannot get treatment. It’s a do-it-yourself disease. Sufferers have to
search far and wide for any type of relief. Most cannot afford to get
out-of-the-box treatments, even if they can find them. Many die from this
disease, too many by their own hand. YET … for decades now, the Lyme Cabal has
been preaching that Lyme disease is ‘difficult to catch, easy to diagnose and
easy to treat’. Tell the sick and infirm that this is true and see what happens.
Here is an example of the victim blaming – even worse, federally-funded victim
blaming, using taxpayers hard-earned dollars:
“Advocacy for Lyme disease has become an increasingly important part of an
antiscience movement that denies both the viral cause of AIDS and the benefits
of vaccines and that supports unproven (sometimes dangerous) alternative medical
treatments. Some activists portray Lyme disease, a geographically limited
tick-borne infection, as a disease that is insidious, ubiquitous, difficult to
diagnose, and almost incurable; they also propose that the disease causes mainly
non-specific symptoms that can be treated only with long-term antibiotics and
other unorthodox and unvalidated treatments. Similar to other antiscience
groups, these advocates have created a pseudoscientific and alternative
selection of practitioners, research, and publications and have coordinated
public protests, accused opponents of both corruption and conspiracy, and
spurred legislative efforts to subvert evidence-based medicine and peer-reviewed
science. The relations and actions of some activists, medical practitioners, and
commercial bodies involved in Lyme disease advocacy pose a threat to public
health.”http://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(11)70034-2/abstract
When I had the chance to ask one of the co-authors, Dr. Raymond Dattwyler why he
and his colleagues would write such an article, his response was “They were
bothering us.” Enough said!
So, if in fact as these authors would like you to believe, Lyme disease is NOT
insidious, ubiquitous, difficult to diagnose and incurable, then why are they
bothering to create a vaccine at all. If Lyme disease is nothing more than a
nuisance condition as some have misclassified it, then why bother? Why
inoculate? Why fast track it? What’s the point? Why the hype? What’s the rush?
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) -- a federal agency that
conducts and supports health promotion, prevention and preparedness activities
in the United States – along with the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)
have been the leading deniers of Lyme disease.
In 2012, when the CDC revised the official case number of new Lyme disease
infections per year from 30,000 to over 300,000 new Lyme––overnight, those of us
in the know understood that they were getting the public ready to accept this
upcoming vaccine with open arms and a sense of relief. In other words, scare the
public just enough to make them open to wanting this product without causing
mass panic nationwide or worldwide. And without having to explain their denial
to date.
Let it be known that 300,000 cases per year makes Lyme disease almost twice as
common as breast cancer and six times more common than HIV/AIDS. So why is it
that Lyme sufferers receive far more support and guidance from their fellow Lyme
sufferers on Facebook than in any doctor’s office? Where are the Public Service
Announcements that have not been issued by the government, the CDC, the IDSA?
Why are infectious disease doctors most notorious for their denial of chronic
Lyme disease?
Policy drivers have remained fixated on surveillance of ticks and the early,
non-disseminated, acute stage of Lyme disease, rather than the millions of Lyme
patients who have become disabled from prolonged exposure to infection and have
become incapacitated. This class of patients have been widely ignored causing
sufferers to have to go it alone, fight the medical system, experiencing denial
of their illness and complete medical abandonment. Those in the know will tell
you that Lyme disease can and often does become a life altering infection if not
treated immediately. Just ask Duke University Professor Neil Spector, who
required a heart transplant after experiencing four years of
undiagnosed-untreated Lyme disease. Or Dr. Alfred Miller, a retired Mayo Clinic
rheumatologist whose daughter-in-law was diagnosed with ALS at age 43 which
spurred him to discover links between Lyme and ALS.
Source:https://on-lyme.org/nl/investigators/research/miller
2. THE CRIMINAL ACTS THAT LANDED US HERE
In 1993, the ‘Lyme Cabal’ were in Phase I and II of their OspA LYMErix vaccine
trials.
What is OspA? Outer surface protein A transmitted by two types of dirty
needles––the shed blebs of the spirochete (aka tick phylum) and the vaccine
LYmerix. OspA detonates the immune system creating the same disease outcome
regardless of which way it’s transmitted.
Make no mistake! The Lyme Cabal knew as early as Phase I trials that their OspA
vaccine would cause the same disease as the tick-borne illness.
Ergo—their master plan … to create a definition of Lyme disease that would fit
their upcoming vaccine model and thereby get the vaccine approved and to market.
So …in 1994, the CDC hosted a consensus conference in Dearborn, MI, along with a
dozen labs across the country and together they falsified the very definition of
Lyme disease by eliminating the neurological, immunosuppressive type which
account for 85% of the cases.
If they conveniently ‘determined’ that the 85% group – those with an
immunosuppression neurological outcome––simply did NOT exist, then they could
claim that their vaccine was 85% effective. With no immunosuppressive,
neurological disease to find, then the vaccine would be a hit with the remaining
15% who presented with an arthritic, bad-knee type only. A brilliant marketing
scheme at the expense of millions worldwide for the years to come.
You see, you CANNOT create a vaccine for an OspA fungal antigen -- the TRUE
definition of chronic Lyme. It can’t be done. And the OspA vaccination known as
LYMErix caused the same disease from a syringe as it does when you get Lyme
disease from a tick bite. LYMErix victim’s immune systems were destroyed by the
vaccine because OspA is an endotoxin that causes immunosuppression and
subsequent severe neurologic multi-system disease.
So by narrowing the definition and by claiming that only one type of the disease
(the bad knee arthritic type) exists, then they could sell a vaccine. Not only
that. They were also able to profit by limiting the number of labs that were
sanctioned and thereby cornering the market on the patents of a variety of tick
borne diseases
3. THE FIRST LYME VACCINE WAS A COMPLETE BUST
In 1998, the FDA approved a new recombinant Lyme vaccine, LYMErix™.
This OspA vaccine was in the end the very thing, the very fungal antigen, the
very TLR2-agonist (structure equaling function), that caused the New Great
Imitator outcomes of MS, ALS, Lupus, Chronic Fatigue, Cancer, and more.
LYMErix did not produce antibodies. It is a fungal antigen. It activates latent
herpesviruses, which are basically the main drivers of the MS and Lupus
outcomes. And OspA-induced tolerance to similar TLR2-agonists causing the ALS
and Chronic Fatigue outcomes (mycoplasma bear OspA-like antigens).
LYMErix vaccine (and the Tuberculosis vaccines) all failed because they caused
immunosuppression, no antibodies, and they made the victims more susceptible to
other infections.
The LYMErix vaccine caused the same disease that us tick bite sepsis victims
know as “Chronic Lyme disease”. It was not taken off the market due to low
sales. The manufacturer SmithKline Beecham was given an ultimatum in 2002 by the
FDA to take it off the market or they would.
Why would the Lyme cabal purposely create a Lyme vaccine that is harmful. Well,
first and foremost, there is a matter of patents and profits. Secondly, in order
to get the vaccine to market, they have to show that the vaccine will create
antibodies to produce a certain level of protection. And it is only when these
lipids are exposed (OspA) that the immune system will see them and cause an
immune response. "Falsify some data, throw out those volunteers, and do whatever
you have to to make the data fit the scientific narrative." says Truthcures
activist Beaux Reliosis. Here is a relatively new scientific report confirming
that this is the case.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5372817/
The falsified definition of Lyme disease created by the Lyme Cabal in 1994
followed by the driving force of this criminal act – their precious LYMErix
vaccine – is the entire reason that millions world-over are suffering from this
holy hell and why infectious disease doctors everywhere will tell you that
‘there is not such thing as chronic Lyme, it’s no more than a nuisance disease,
it’s all in your head, it’s the celebrities creating hype and drama that is
really the root of the problem.’ Those celebrities. Shame.
In case you’re interested, here are just a few of the LYMErix victims’
stories.https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/briefing/3680b2_17.pdf
And this: “A wide range of neurological complications have been reported via the
medical literature and the VAERS system after vaccination with recombinant outer
surface protein A (OspA) of Borrelia. To explore this issue, 24 patients
reporting neurological adverse events (AE) after vaccination with Lymerix, out
of a group of 94 patients reporting adverse events after Lymerix vaccination,
were examined for causation. Five reports of cerebral ischemia, two transient
Ischemic attacks, five demyelinating events, two optic neuritis, two reports of
transverse myelitis, and one non-specific demyelinating condition are evaluated
in this paper.”https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21673416
Bottom line: OspA is Pam3Cys. TLR2/1 fungal endotoxins cannot be a vaccine.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=(pam3cys%20or%20pam3*%20or%20p3c)%20and%20(immune%20suppression%20or%20tolerance)
4. AND NOW … A NEW LYME VACCINE IS ABOUT TO BE LAUNCHED
And NOW, The French company Valneva is starting their phase 1 trials here in the
United States and in Belgium this year.
Another version of the very same Osp vaccine.
What they fail to mention is that OspA is Pam3Cys. Which leads to
immunosuppression and immune tolerance, reactivated viruses (EBV and CMV,
Herpes) and opportunistic infections, multiple severe neurologic diseases
occurring simultaneously, post-sepsis syndrome. A B-Cell AIDS destroying the
lives of millions.
This new ‘fast-tracked” Lyme vaccine will represent just one more chapter in
this global medical holocaust we know as chronic Lyme. We're all doing our best
to warn YOU––the unsuspecting public––that you can't vaccinate against an OspA
fungal antigen. It can't be done.
It will do nothing more than make you sick with permanent immunosuppression …
and a life of hell.
Why would BigPharma want to 'sell' yet another OspA vaccine and risk making
people sick? Your guess is as good as mine but we always know that our best bet
is to follow the money. Enough time has passed since LYMErix. They've worked
very hard to blame the victims for the last fiasco and take no responsibility.
They've created just enough public concern about this so-called 'nuisance
disease' that people will be lining up to get it. They are in a good space right
now to bring a new vaccine to market and make a fortune. As long as they figure
out how to mitigate some of the damage this time, they will walk away with a
huge money-maker, and––yes––with casualties that they can once again blame on
anti-vaxxers, Lyme loonies, and the media.
5. YOU’RE SMARTER THAN THIS!
For the most part, the medical powers that be do NOT have your best interests at
heart. Certainly not when it comes to chronic Lyme disease. They have too much
to hide and nothing to gain by allowing it to come out from behind the
well-placed forty year shadows. The medical-industrial complex is designed to
make money. Period. It is not designed to make people well or to be concerned
about public good.
Remember this. Do your research. Listen to those suffering. And think about
whether it makes any sense that millions of people would be faking their illness
for some personal gain and allow their lives to be destroyed for what?
Above all, read, research, ask questions, challenge your doctors, and think long
and hard before you allow yourself or your loved ones to be forever destroyed by
this up-and-coming Lyme vaccine.
Lori Dennis, MA, RP is a Registered Psychotherapist and the author of LYME
MADNESS, named #1 NEW RELEASE in Immune System Health on Amazon. LYME MADNESS is
available on Amazon. For more information on Lyme Madness, go to
loridennisonline.com.
=======================================================================
22.) SIDE EFFECTS IN YOUNG GIRLS TAKE GARDASIL OUT FROM JAPANESE MARKET
=======================================================================
Source:ttps://www.tokyotimes.com/side-effects-in-young-girls-take-gardasil-out-from-japanese-market/
Around 2,000 reported side effects after using Gardasil cervical cancer vaccine
have determined Japanese government officials to withdraw Gardasil from the
market in 2013, despite the vaccine being highly promoted in the United States
and now approved by the European Union.
“Japanese health officials have recorded nearly 2,000 adverse reactions –
hundreds of them serious,” reported Judicial Watch, the Washington-based
corruption watchdog that has been monitoring the effects – and health costs – of
the drug’s use in the United States for years.
“The alarming reports have led Japan’s government to take action, suspending
recommendation for the controversial vaccine which is billed as a miracle shot
that can prevent certain strains of cervical cancer caused by Human
Papillomavirus (HPV).”
“The U.S. government has taken the opposite approach amid equally alarming cases
of serious side effects. Not only does the Obama administration continue
recommending the vaccine (Gardasil), it spends large sums of taxpayer dollars
promoting it and works hard to keep details involving its dangers secret.”
The side effects of using Gardasil include seizures, brain damage, blindness,
paralysis, speech problems, pancreatitis and short-term memory loss, while other
patients have died after taking the vaccine. Gardasil is given to little girls
and costs around $600 per patient.
The organization confirmed that in Japan, the Ministry of Health, Labor and
Welfare warned local governments that the HPV vaccine should not be recommended
amid safety concerns.
Japan’s officials had paid more than $187 million for “urgent HPV vaccination
programs” for girls between 11 and 14 and visited junior high schools to promote
the vaccine.
“Since the government began offering girls HPV shots, 1,968 adverse events were
reported, including 358 that were evaluated as serious by a JMLHW committee.
Parents began calling the country’s health minister and furnishing videos in
which girls who had received the HPV vaccine suffered from walking disturbances,
body tics and seizures. In other cases many girls injected with the vaccine fell
to the floor, injuring their head or face and some fracturing their jaw or
teeth,” Judicial Watch reported.
The damage payments of nearly $6 million covered only some of the 200 claims
that have been filed to date.
=====================================================================
23.) Vaccines do NOT cause injuries, according to House Resolution 327
====================================================================
Source:https://www.naturalhealth365.com/vaccines-side-effects-2324.html
(NaturalHealth365) The introduction of House Resolution 327 for consideration by
the U.S. House of Representatives marks an attempt to take the vaccine injury
cover-up to a whole new level. This action is indicative of the level of
dangerous cluelessness and brainwashing being directed at the American public,
as it relates to the dangers of vaccines.
This new resolution also highlights the influence of money some of these
legislators are likely receiving from big pharma. House Resolution 327 asserts
that there is “no credible evidence” to show vaccines cause disabling or
life-threatening diseases in healthy adults or children.
This is just one of its numerous demonstrably false claims.
U.S. House members ignore the negative side effects of vaccines
The resolution was introduced by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Burbank, CA) and is
co-sponsored by at least 33 of his colleagues so far. These legislators are
apparently unfamiliar with even basic vaccine facts and policy. Vaccine product
inserts and the federal government’s own data list numerous vaccine side effects
and the potential for vaccine injury.
The fact that the vaccine companies themselves warn about the risk of possible
vaccine injury to both children and adults in otherwise good health should be
reason enough to negate this resolution. However, the individuals behind the
draft also seem to be unaware of the billions of dollars paid out by the vaccine
court to the families of vaccine-injured children.
The vaccine court, or National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, has ruled
for the plaintiffs in thousands of vaccine injury claims. This court has paid
out over $3.5 billion in damages thus far since its founding in 1986.
House Resolution 327 calls vaccine side effects and risks “unfounded”
If vaccines are as safe as Schiff and his colleagues seem to believe, then why
do vaccine companies and doctors seek liability protection from vaccine
injuries? The resolution itself admits that vaccine recipients must be
“monitored for adverse events” after vaccine shots are given.
House Resolution 327 also has the gall to call efforts toward vaccine safety and
education the dissemination of “unfounded and debunked” theories about vaccine
dangers and their risk to public health. You can read the entire text of House
Resolution 327 here. (Notice how it reads like a press release issued by a
vaccine company).
Full link here:https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-resolution/327/text
Fortunately, House Resolutions do not go directly to the Senate or President for
consideration as a law even if passed. However, they are considered preferred
policy positions and statements of consensus of the House of Representatives.
Take action: Contact your U.S. House representative
The fact that this resolution contains such outrageously flawed language and
positions is disturbing to say the least. House Resolution 327 would enshrine
demonstrably incorrect information about vaccines as preferred U.S. House of
Representatives policy.
Numerous elements of the document can be easily refuted just by referencing the
long list of publicly documented vaccine side effects and injuries.
Anyone who wishes to take action and voice their opposition regarding this
resolution may do so by finding and messaging their House member directly.
Contact information for U.S. House of Representatives members can be accessed
herehttps://www.house.gov
=======================================================================
24.) H. RES. 327
======================================================================
115th CONGRESS
1st Session
Source:https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-resolution/327/text
Recognizing the importance of vaccinations and immunizations in the United
States.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
May 16, 2017
Mr. Schiff (for himself, Mr. Marino, Mr. Cicilline, Mr. Engel, Ms. Clarke of New
York, Mr. Foster, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Langevin, Ms. Michelle Lujan
Grisham of New Mexico, Mr. Cooper, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. Blumenauer,
Ms. DeGette, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Ms. Eshoo, and
Mr. Dent) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce
RESOLUTION
Recognizing the importance of vaccinations and immunizations in the United
States.
Whereas the contributions of Louis Pasteur and Edward Jenner to the discovery of
the principles of vaccination and immunology are among the most consequential
health findings in human history;
Whereas vaccines have made it possible for the world to have eradicated
smallpox, saving approximately 5 million lives annually, and for the
international community to be on the brink of eradicating polio and to have
saved an estimated 5 million people from this incurable disease over the past 2
decades,
Whereas vaccines have dramatically reduced the spread of many more crippling and
potentially life-threatening diseases such as diphtheria, tetanus, measles,
mumps, and rubella, and vaccines prevent the spread of commonly infectious and
potentially fatal diseases such as chickenpox, shingles, influenza, hepatitis A,
hepatitis B, meningococcal disease, pneumococcal, rotavirus, and whooping cough
(pertussis);
Whereas the scientific and medical communities are in overwhelming consensus
that vaccines are both effective and safe, and the dissemination of unfounded,
and debunked, theories about the dangers of vaccinations pose a great risk to
public health, and scientifically sound education and outreach campaigns about
vaccination and immunization are fundamental for a well-informed public;
Whereas an estimated 43,000 adults and 300 children die annually from
vaccine-preventable diseases or their complications in the United States, and
the health and livelihood of young children, seniors, individuals with
immunodeficiency disorders, and those who cannot be vaccinated, is particularly
compromised by communities with low vaccination rates;
Whereas substantial research has shown that vaccination is a highly
cost-effective form of preventive medicine, and the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) estimates that vaccinations will save nearly $295 billion
in direct costs and $1.38 trillion in total societal costs in the United States;
Whereas vaccines in the United States undergo exhaustive safety testing before
they are licensed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and are monitored
for adverse events after health care providers begin administering them to
patients;
Whereas there are three post-marketing surveillance systems in the United States
tracking adverse events after vaccination;
Whereas it is estimated that vaccinations will prevent more than 21 million
hospitalizations and 732,000 deaths among children born in the last 20 years,
and that more than 100 million children all over the world are immunized each
year and vaccines have saved an estimated 2.5 million children annually;
Whereas one in five children worldwide still lack access to even the most basic
vaccines and, as a result, an estimated 1.5 million children a year die from
vaccine-preventable conditions such as diarrhea and pneumonia or suffer from
permanently debilitating illnesses;
Whereas a strong investment in medical research to improve existing vaccines and
develop many more life-saving vaccines is beneficial to all, both at home and
abroad, and a robust immunization infrastructure is essential to the public
health and well-being of the people of the United States by preventing and
isolating outbreaks of contagious diseases where they start;
Whereas encouraging high vaccination rates in the United States protects our
citizens from contracting vaccine-preventable diseases that are pandemic in
countries with low vaccination and immunization rates;
Whereas routine and up-to-date immunization is the most effective method
available to prevent the infection and transmission of potentially fatal
diseases; and
Whereas the United States has been a leader in promoting vaccinations around the
world through the United States Agency for International Development, the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, the
Global Polio Eradication Initiative, UNICEF, the World Health Organization, and
a host of other multilateral and nongovernmental organizations: Now, therefore,
be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives—
(1) commends the international community, global and domestic health
organizations, the private sector, school and community leaders, and faith-based
organizations for their tireless work and immense contributions to bolstering
our global and domestic health through vaccination;
(2) affirms vaccines and immunizations save lives and are essential to maintain
the public health, and the economic and national security of the people of the
United States;
(3) recognizes that the lack of vaccination can cause a true public health
crisis, and that there is no credible evidence to show that vaccines cause
life-threatening or disabling diseases in healthy children or adults;
(4) encourages a continued commitment to research to improve vaccines and to
develop new vaccines against other infectious and fatal diseases; and
(5) urges parents, in consultation with their health care provider, to follow
the scientific evidence and consensus of medical experts in favor of timely
vaccinations to protect their children and their community.
=======================================================================
25.) Neurological complications of vaccination with outer surface protein A (OspA).
=======================================================================
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2011;23(2):89-96. doi: 10.3233/JRS-2011-0527.
Marks DH1.
Author information
1
Department of Medicine, Cooper Green Mercy Hospital, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Extant4@Hotmail.com
Abstract
A wide range of neurological complications have been reported via the medical
literature and the VAERS system after vaccination with recombinant outer surface
protein A (OspA) of Borrelia. To explore this issue, 24 patients reporting
neurological adverse events (AE) after vaccination with Lymerix, out of a group
of 94 patients reporting adverse events after Lymerix vaccination, were examined
for causation. Five reports of cerebral ischemia, two transient Ischemic
attacks, five demyelinating events, two optic neuritis, two reports of
transverse myelitis, and one non-specific demyelinating condition are evaluated
in this paper. Caution is raised on not actively looking for neurologic AE, and
for not considering causation when the incidence rate is too low to raise a
calculable difference to natural occurence.
=======================================================================
26.) Spirochetal Lipoproteins and Immune Evasion
=======================================================================
Front Immunol. 2017; 8: 364.
Published online 2017 Mar 29. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00364
Alexei Christodoulides,1 Ani Boyadjian,1 and Theodoros Kelesidis1,*
Abstract
Spirochetes are a major threat to public health. However, the exact pathogenesis
of spirochetal diseases remains unclear. Spirochetes express lipoproteins that
often determine the cross talk between the host and spirochetes. Lipoproteins
are pro-inflammatory, modulatory of immune responses, and enable the spirochetes
to evade the immune system. In this article, we review the modulatory effects of
spirochetal lipoproteins related to immune evasion. Understanding
lipoprotein-induced immunomodulation will aid in elucidating innate pathogenesis
processes and subsequent adaptive mechanisms potentially relevant to spirochetal
disease vaccine development and treatment.
======================================================================
27.) Does a New Hepatitis Vaccine Cause Heart Attacks?
=====================================================================
Source:https://www.medpagetoday.com/blogs/revolutionandrevelation/67019
by Milton Packer
August 02, 2017
The FDA has a really important question and wants your advice.
This is not a fairy tale. This is a real-life story.
Hepatitis B is a serious disease. A company (Dynavax) has a new hepatitis
vaccine that induces hepatitis antibodies more vigorously than existing vaccines
and does so after 2 doses (instead of the usual 3). The vaccine works through a
unique adjuvant. The serological advantages of the Dynavax vaccine were
demonstrated in a randomized trial of >8000 patients; about 5600 people received
the new vaccine and about 2800 people received the existing standard.
Why does the FDA need your help?
In the trial, an acute myocardial infarction occurred in 14 people in the
Dynavax group, but in only one person receiving the conventional vaccine. The
events were confirmed by adjudication. Since the Dynavax group was twice as
large, the risk of acute myocardial infarction in the trial was seven times
greater with the new vaccine. The FDA wants to know if the new vaccine should be
approved for use in millions of people.
What do you say? What recommendation would you make?
If you think this is just hypothetical, think again. On July 28, 2017, the FDA
convened a public advisory committee meeting to consider this exact question.
The members of the committee consisted primarily of experts in infectious
diseases and immunology. I was the only cardiologist on the committee.
If the 14:1 imbalance was due to the play of chance, then the issue of
myocardial infarction risk was spurious, and the vaccine should be approved.
However, if the 14:1 imbalance reflected a real increase in cardiovascular risk,
then approval of Dynavax vaccine would be problematic.
Was it biologically plausible for the new vaccine to cause heart attacks?
The new adjuvant in the vaccine caused an inflammatory response (of uncertain
duration), and inflammation is an important cause of rupture of atherosclerotic
plaques. So a causal linkage was not out of the question.
Was the imbalance in myocardial infarctions due to the play of chance?
That was a good question, but it was impossible to know. Many might think that
calculation of a P value would help, but it wouldn't. P values have a place in
clinical trials, but not when the number of events is so small and the number of
comparisons is so great. So no one asked for or showed any P values during the
meeting. Everyone agreed that statistics could not resolve the uncertainty.
If you wanted to know if the 14:1 imbalance represented a real risk, you needed
more information. You needed comparative data in 50,000 people. The fastest way
of obtaining that evidence was through a post-marketing trial. But a
post-marketing trial was possible only if the vaccine was approved for public
use.
So what recommendation would you have made to the FDA?
The FDA asked the committee if there was reasonable evidence that the vaccine
was safe. On July 28, the committee vote 12-1 (with 3 abstentions) in favor of
the safety of the new vaccine. I was one of the three abstentions. Most of the
committee believed that the vaccine's serological advantages outweighed the
uncertainty, but the vote is non-binding. The FDA will decide on the new vaccine
by August 10.
Why did I abstain? Based on the available data, it was impossible for anyone to
know if the imbalance in myocardial infarctions was real or spurious. So
although the question was fascinating and the discussion was terrific, my vote
wasn't that complicated.
There is a simple rule in life: if you don't know, you should say that you don't
know.
=======================================================================
28.) FDA extends review on Dynavax's Heplisav-B, but management remains
confident
=======================================================================
source:http://www.fiercepharma.com/vaccines/dynavax-shares-roller-coaster-as-fda-requires-heplisav-b-postmarketing-details
The fate of hepatitis B vaccine candidate Heplisav-B has sent developer
Dynavax’s shares, and its investors, on a wild ride in recent days. A request by
the FDA for more details of the vaccine’s postmarketing surveillance plan sent
the company's stock slightly downward, but both management and analysts said
they remain confident in approval.
Given the closeness of the FDA's action date for the vaccine on August 10,
Dynavax said that after discussion with the agency they have agreed to extend
the review date for up to three months to finalize details of the postmarketing
study.
The agency’s request mainly centers on ensuring accurate, timely collection of
real-world safety data from Heplisav-B use.
During an analyst call Thursday afternoon, Dynavax CEO Eddie Gray stressed that
the FDA’s request is “wholly consistent with” what the agency's expert panel had
expressed earlier in the week. During that panel, experts voted 12 to 1 in favor
of the shot’s safety profile, a result that sent Dynavax’s stock to a one-year
high. But the panel also raised concerns about the proposed design of the
surveillance program.
RELATED: Heplisav-B approval ‘highly probable’ as FDA Advisory Committee favors
Dynavax on third try
“This delay … does not in any way impact our confidence that the vaccine should
be approved or our internal launch plans and timeline,” Gray said during the
call.
Perhaps because the issue was already well expressed during the FDA panel
discussion, Dynavax's share price is gradually recovering from a slight slip
Friday. At least one analyst shared Dynavax’s optimism.
“[W]e don’t view this delay as fundamentally changing the narrative, and
continue to see approval as a matter of when, not if,” RBC Capital Markets
analyst Matthew Eckler wrote in a note to investors. “The recent positive FDA
AdCom was a key derisking event for Heplisav-B, and given the vaccine’s superior
profile, it has the potential to capture significant market share, as well as
drive expansion.”
Eckler previously projected that the vaccine could reach peak U.S. sales of $290
million in 2026.
Under the current plan, Dynavax is aiming to launch the shot, a challenger to
GlaxoSmithKline’s Engerix-B, in the U.S. in early 2018. It's proposing to
conduct the phase 4 study in collaboration with Kaiser Permanente Northern
California to monitor medical records for 20,000 Heplisav-B recipients against
20,000 others who receive the GSK shot during a 12-month follow-up. It's likely
that cardiac incidents, for which an imbalance was seen in a phase 3 study, will
be the main focus.
Gray added that the company is on track to present to the CDC’s Advisory
Committee on Immunization Practices at their meeting in late October, even if
it’s before the Nov. 10 FDA decision deadline.
=====================================================================
29.) Can Hib Vaccine Cause Injury?
=====================================================================
Source:http://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/hib/hib-vaccine-injury.aspx
Mild side effects such as redness, warmth, or swelling where the shot was given
have been reported in connection with administration of Hib vaccines. Fever over
101 degrees F may occur, and can last two to three days. Sysemic reactions
include irritability and lethargy. However, more severe reactions have also been
reported in both clinical trials with all of the vaccines as well as to the
Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).
According to MedAlerts.org (a searchable VAERS database) as of June 2012, there
have been 12,140 serious adverse events reported to VAERS in connection with all
Hib vaccines combined. Most of this number were children under age 3 (11,278).
Serious reactions included deaths (471) and such things as anaphylactic
reaction, asthma, pneumonia, convulsions, noninfectious encephalitis, acute
pancreatitis, peripheral neuropathy, Guillain-Barre syndrome, sepsis, seizures,
cerebral edema.
In clinical trials the severity of adverse reactions varied depending on which
vaccine was given, and which other vaccines were given with them at the same
time. Some of the events reported by the manufacturers included:
ActHIB — tenderness, erythema, induration, fever, irritability, drowsiness,
anorexia, diarrhea, vomiting; when combined with DTP vaccine by reconstitution,
adverse reactions included: tenderness, erythema, induration, fever,
irritability, drowsiness, anorexia, diarrhea, persistent crying, and one
hypotonic/hypresponsive episode (which is consistent with the HHE rate observed
with DTP vaccination alone)
Hiberix — when co-administered with DTaP-HBV-IPV: redness, pain and swelling at
injection site, fever, fussiness, loss of appetite, restlessness, sleepiness,
diarrhea, vomiting; post-marketing reported adverse events included extensive
swelling of the vaccinated limb, anaphylactic reactions, angioedema,
convulsions, hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode, syncope, apnea, rash, urticarial,
somnolence.
PedvaxHIB — adverse events during clinical trials included irritability,
sleepiness, injection siter pain/soreness, erythema, swelling induration,
unusual high-pitched crying, prolonged crying (more than 4 hours), diarrhea,
vomiting, crying, pain, otitis media, rash, and upper respiratory infection;
potential adverse events may include early onset of Hib disease and
Guillain-Barre syndrome; in post-marketing, reported adverse events included
lymphadenopathy, angioedema, febrile seizures and injection site abscess.
Comvax — (children in clinical trials were monitored five days) with the most
frequently cited events being mild, transient signs and symptoms of inflammation
at the injection site, pain/soreness, erythema, swelling, induration,
somnolence, irritability, anorexia, vomiting, otitis media, fever, diarrhea,
upper respiratory infection, rash, rhinorrhea, respiratory congestion, cough,
candidiasis; in post-marketing: anaplylaxis, angioedema, urticarial, erythema
multiforme, thrombocytopenia, seizure, febrile seizures, lymphadenopathy,
pruritus, arthralgia, dyspnea, tachycardia, syncope, elevation of liver enzymes,
increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate, arthritis, Bell’s Palsy,
Guillain-Barre syndrome, agitation, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, alopecia,
conjunctivitis, visual disturbances.
Pentacel — redness, swelling, tenderness at injection site, increase in arm
circumference (dose 4), fever, lethargy, inconsolable crying, fussiness,
irritability, hypotonic hyporesponsive episodes, seizures, febrile seizures,
bronchiolitis, dehydration, pneumonia, gastroenteritis, asthma, pneumonia,
encephalopathy, and four deaths attributed to asphyxia due to suffocation, head
trauma, Sudden Infant Death syndrome (SIDS), and neuroblastoma; in
post-marketing, reported adverse events included cyanosis, vomiting, diarrhea,
extensive swelling of injected limb including swelling that involved adjacent
joints, invasive Hib disease (classified as vaccine failure), rash, urticarial,
meningitis, rhinitis, viral infection, decreased appetitie, somnolence, HHE,
depressed level of consciousness, screaming, apnea, cough, erythema, skin
discoloroation, and pallor.
MenHibrix — redness, swelling and pain at injection site, irritability,
drowsiness, loss of appetitie, fever, and syncope. For more severe reactions
such as nervous system disorders and other serious events, the manufacturer
referred to reactions reported by the use of Hiberix rather than its own
vaccine. It is not known whether MenHibrix can cause fetal harm when
administered to a pregnant woman or whether it can affect reproduction capacity.
1
Besides the deaths reported in the clinical trials, deaths have been recorded in
post-marketing reports as well. In fact, an open letter to Dr. Margaret Chan,
director general of the World Health Organization, in March 2012 calls attention
to the deaths the author says are connected with the pentavalent (DPT + Hib +
Hepatitis B vaccine in India, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, and Pakistan.2 The authors add
that the cause of the problem is unrelated to the brand or manufacturer or lot
of the vaccine:
“It appears to be a form of ‘hypersensitivity reaction’ as described in the post
mortem report on one of the children in Kerala. The vaccine can be administered
to many patients without problems and there is no available method at present to
predict which infant will react adversely.”
In a pediatric safety and use review of Pentacel in February 2010 the U.S. FDA
discussed reported adverse reactions attributed to the vaccine in
post-marketing, noting that Pentacel is now marketed in 11 countries, and there
have been no safety-related labeling revisions. At the meeting, the FDA reported
that 775 adverse reactions, 177 of which were considered serious including 26
deaths, had been reported to VAERS in connection with Pentacel between June 20,
2008 (when Pentacel was licensed) and October 31, 2009. The deaths were
attributed to SIDS (12 cases), congenital/genetic conditions, respiratory
infections, positional asphyxia, anoxic encephalopathy, cardiac arrest of
undetermined etiology, dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, two deaths of
undetermined cause, one death with no records obtainable, and two deaths with
information pending.
The FDA said the SIDS reports “do not raise any concerns about a causal
relationship with Pentacel.” The FDA also quoted the Institue of Medicine, which
reviewed the data, and the IOM said: “The evidence favors rejection of a causal
relationship between exposure to multiple vaccines and SIDS.” The FDA noted that
“the sponsor is voluntarily conducting a descriptive, epidemiological safety
surveillance study that will include at least 10,000 Pentacel recipients” with
comparison groups of infants who receive other DTaP-containing products.3
Antigenuria has been reported after receipt of purified capsular polysaccharide
H. influenza b vaccine. In one reported case, a 27-month-old child developed
asceptic meningitis two days after getting the vaccine. Tests revealed that
antigenuria was secondary to the vaccination.4,5,6None of the vaccines have been
evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or potential to impair
fertility.
========================================================================
Produced by Dr. Jose Lapenta R. Dermatologist
Maracay Estado Aragua Venezuela 2.017
Telf: 02432327287-02432328571
Si Te ha gustado, Compartelo
