Gardasil HPV Vaccine & Merck Lawsuit in Colombia.
Vacuna Gardasil contra VPH & Merck Demandados en Colombia. !!!
EDITORIAL ENGLISH
==================
Hello friends of the DERMAGIC EXPRESS network today brings you a hot topic today, of the GARDASIL AND CERVARIX VACCINES created to prevent HPV, and which worldwide are being highly criticized and challenged by their ADVERSE EFFECTS AND DEATHS. In this case it is the country COLOMBIA where MERCK SHARP & DHOME LABORATORY WAS SUED FOR 160 MILLION DOLLARS, because of the damages caused by the GARDASIL VACCINE to hundreds of Colombian girls.
I am going to start this POST, saying once again that pharmaceutical LABORATORIES exist to CREATE and INVENT solutions for humanity, either through medicines for oral use, intramuscular, parenteral, vitamins, etc. and VACCINES. That is the MISSION of every laboratory, AND WHEN THE INVENTION OR CREATION, like medicines via ORAL, PARENTERAL or VACCINES produces TOO MUCH ADVERSE EFFECTS AND KILLS the population that uses them, usually and CALL OF THE DUTY, said MEDICATION OR VACCINE MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE MARKET and the victims compensated economically, (if they survived the use of them).
On April 2, 2017, I made the publication TWELVE MEDICINES OUT FROM THE MARKET, THE 12 OF THE PARTY, as an example, teaching and documentation of 12 MEDICINES that were released to the market with high expectations and then had to be withdrawn from the market DUE TO ITS GREAT ADVERSE EFFECTS, EVEN DEATH that you can read here:
TWELVE MEDICINES OUT FROM THE MARKET, THE TWELVE OF THE PARTY
On February 1, 2,017 launched the publication LOOKING FOR A VACCINE FOR THE LYME DISEASE, update of the ORIGINAL publication launched on February 18, 1999 in the ORIGINAL DERMAGIC EXPRESS, (16 years ago) which explains in few words how THIS VACCINE named LYMERrix launched in 1,998 by the laboratory GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) had to be withdrawn 4 years later FOR THE GREAT ADVERSE EFFECTS caused to the vaccinated population, you can read it here:
LOOKING FOR A VACCINE FOR LYME DISEASE
Subsequently on June 5, 2.017 launches another publication dedicated to the NEW VACCINE FOR THE LYME DISEASE , which today is being "tested" and its results are expected to be APPROVED or DENIED, it has its followers and their detractors, the you can read here
NEW VACCINE VL 15 FOR LYME DISEASE, NEW FRAUD?
On May 27, 2.017, I made another publication that recounts the STORIES OF 12 CASES AFFECTED BY THE LYMErix VACCINE FOR THE LYME DISEASE with the aim of raising awareness in the general population of the DANGER that means a VACCINE that instead of protecting you causes GREAT ADVERSE EFFECTS and even DEATH, which you can read here.
HISTORY OF VICTIMS OF THE VACCINE FOR LYME DISEASE
On June 24, 2.017 I make another publication under the name of HPV, HUMAN PAPILLOMA VIRUS, behavior in our world, BEFORE THE VACCINES (GARDASIL CERVARIX), which was an UPDATE of the original publication launched on the internet on August 18 of 1.999 in the ORIGINAL DERMAGIC EXPRESS (18 years ago), WHEN HPV VACCINES HAD NOT ARRIVED and where I explained that HPV MORTALITY was caused mainly by CANCER due to the discovery of ONCOGENIC HPV STRAINS. You can read it here:
HPV, HUMAN PAPILLOMA VIRUS BEFORE VACCINES
Subsequently on July 1, 2.017 published the second part of the previous publication under the name of HPV AFTER THE VACCINES, STOP GARDASIL AND CERVARIX, which explain the specific topic of SIDE EFFECTS AND DEATH CAUSED BY THESE VACCINES in several countries of the world and you can read it here:
HPV, HUMAN PAPILLOMA VIRUS AFTER VACCINES, STOP GARDASIL AND CERVARIX
On May 15, 2.002, 15 years ago, launched the publication AUTISM THIMEROSAL AND VACCINESS, in the original THE DERMAGIC EXPRESS, which deals with the issue of which VACCINE COMPONENTS (PRESERVATIVES, ADJUVANTS) PROBABLY were and are involved in AUTISM, theme controversial today. This publication I re-launched on this WEB SITE on January 29, 2.017 without changes. And you can read it here:
AUTISM, THIMEROSAL AND VACCINES.
In the year 2.007 - 2.009 exploits the AH1N1 FLU PANDEMIC worldwide and because of it, launches to the network in ORIGINAL DERMAGIC EXPRESS 3 publications on this subject under the name of H1N1 THE RESIDENT EVIL, where it is unveiled the whole plot and intrigue that was behind this flu AND THE VACCINES that were INVENTED for her, the SIDE EFFECTS OF THESE VACCINES. the links in Spanish and English on two of the publications, read here:
H1N1 THE RESIDENT EVIL, IN THE ROUTE TO THE VIROLOGICAL WAR
H1N1 SWINE FLU, VIRUS AND VACCINES X-FILES
With this I want to tell you in a "CRYSTAL" and OBJECTIVE way, that I have more than 15 years inquiring and publishing TRUTHS about MEDICATIONS AND VACCINES, and therefore before I continue the review I put "SOME" of the great details that I have found on these CONTROVERSIAL THEMES.
Then on August 18, 2017 I get this publication on the web:
GARDASIL AND MERCK SUED FOR $160 MILLION DOLLARS IN COLOMBIA FOR DAMAGE CAUSED to the vaccine in that country, which was introduced on August 4, for the damages caused to persons vaccinated against HPV by the GARDASIL VACCINE of MERCK SHARP & DHOME laboratory, which led me to carry out this new review on the ADVERSE EFFECTS and DEATHS CAUSED BY THESE GARDASIL AND CERVARIX VACCINES.
The first thing I am going to say about it is that these SECONDARY EFFECTS AND DEATHS, I do not invent them, they are well documented and I put in the first graphic ALL THE EFFECTS REPORTED BY COMPANY SANOFI, INC. Which are approximately 140 INCLUDING DEATH:
==================
Hello friends of the DERMAGIC EXPRESS network today brings you a hot topic today, of the GARDASIL AND CERVARIX VACCINES created to prevent HPV, and which worldwide are being highly criticized and challenged by their ADVERSE EFFECTS AND DEATHS. In this case it is the country COLOMBIA where MERCK SHARP & DHOME LABORATORY WAS SUED FOR 160 MILLION DOLLARS, because of the damages caused by the GARDASIL VACCINE to hundreds of Colombian girls.
I am going to start this POST, saying once again that pharmaceutical LABORATORIES exist to CREATE and INVENT solutions for humanity, either through medicines for oral use, intramuscular, parenteral, vitamins, etc. and VACCINES. That is the MISSION of every laboratory, AND WHEN THE INVENTION OR CREATION, like medicines via ORAL, PARENTERAL or VACCINES produces TOO MUCH ADVERSE EFFECTS AND KILLS the population that uses them, usually and CALL OF THE DUTY, said MEDICATION OR VACCINE MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE MARKET and the victims compensated economically, (if they survived the use of them).
On April 2, 2017, I made the publication TWELVE MEDICINES OUT FROM THE MARKET, THE 12 OF THE PARTY, as an example, teaching and documentation of 12 MEDICINES that were released to the market with high expectations and then had to be withdrawn from the market DUE TO ITS GREAT ADVERSE EFFECTS, EVEN DEATH that you can read here:
TWELVE MEDICINES OUT FROM THE MARKET, THE TWELVE OF THE PARTY
On February 1, 2,017 launched the publication LOOKING FOR A VACCINE FOR THE LYME DISEASE, update of the ORIGINAL publication launched on February 18, 1999 in the ORIGINAL DERMAGIC EXPRESS, (16 years ago) which explains in few words how THIS VACCINE named LYMERrix launched in 1,998 by the laboratory GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) had to be withdrawn 4 years later FOR THE GREAT ADVERSE EFFECTS caused to the vaccinated population, you can read it here:
LOOKING FOR A VACCINE FOR LYME DISEASE
Subsequently on June 5, 2.017 launches another publication dedicated to the NEW VACCINE FOR THE LYME DISEASE , which today is being "tested" and its results are expected to be APPROVED or DENIED, it has its followers and their detractors, the you can read here
NEW VACCINE VL 15 FOR LYME DISEASE, NEW FRAUD?
On May 27, 2.017, I made another publication that recounts the STORIES OF 12 CASES AFFECTED BY THE LYMErix VACCINE FOR THE LYME DISEASE with the aim of raising awareness in the general population of the DANGER that means a VACCINE that instead of protecting you causes GREAT ADVERSE EFFECTS and even DEATH, which you can read here.
HISTORY OF VICTIMS OF THE VACCINE FOR LYME DISEASE
On June 24, 2.017 I make another publication under the name of HPV, HUMAN PAPILLOMA VIRUS, behavior in our world, BEFORE THE VACCINES (GARDASIL CERVARIX), which was an UPDATE of the original publication launched on the internet on August 18 of 1.999 in the ORIGINAL DERMAGIC EXPRESS (18 years ago), WHEN HPV VACCINES HAD NOT ARRIVED and where I explained that HPV MORTALITY was caused mainly by CANCER due to the discovery of ONCOGENIC HPV STRAINS. You can read it here:
HPV, HUMAN PAPILLOMA VIRUS BEFORE VACCINES
Subsequently on July 1, 2.017 published the second part of the previous publication under the name of HPV AFTER THE VACCINES, STOP GARDASIL AND CERVARIX, which explain the specific topic of SIDE EFFECTS AND DEATH CAUSED BY THESE VACCINES in several countries of the world and you can read it here:
HPV, HUMAN PAPILLOMA VIRUS AFTER VACCINES, STOP GARDASIL AND CERVARIX
On May 15, 2.002, 15 years ago, launched the publication AUTISM THIMEROSAL AND VACCINESS, in the original THE DERMAGIC EXPRESS, which deals with the issue of which VACCINE COMPONENTS (PRESERVATIVES, ADJUVANTS) PROBABLY were and are involved in AUTISM, theme controversial today. This publication I re-launched on this WEB SITE on January 29, 2.017 without changes. And you can read it here:
AUTISM, THIMEROSAL AND VACCINES.
In the year 2.007 - 2.009 exploits the AH1N1 FLU PANDEMIC worldwide and because of it, launches to the network in ORIGINAL DERMAGIC EXPRESS 3 publications on this subject under the name of H1N1 THE RESIDENT EVIL, where it is unveiled the whole plot and intrigue that was behind this flu AND THE VACCINES that were INVENTED for her, the SIDE EFFECTS OF THESE VACCINES. the links in Spanish and English on two of the publications, read here:
H1N1 THE RESIDENT EVIL, IN THE ROUTE TO THE VIROLOGICAL WAR
H1N1 SWINE FLU, VIRUS AND VACCINES X-FILES
With this I want to tell you in a "CRYSTAL" and OBJECTIVE way, that I have more than 15 years inquiring and publishing TRUTHS about MEDICATIONS AND VACCINES, and therefore before I continue the review I put "SOME" of the great details that I have found on these CONTROVERSIAL THEMES.
Then on August 18, 2017 I get this publication on the web:
GARDASIL AND MERCK SUED FOR $160 MILLION DOLLARS IN COLOMBIA FOR DAMAGE CAUSED to the vaccine in that country, which was introduced on August 4, for the damages caused to persons vaccinated against HPV by the GARDASIL VACCINE of MERCK SHARP & DHOME laboratory, which led me to carry out this new review on the ADVERSE EFFECTS and DEATHS CAUSED BY THESE GARDASIL AND CERVARIX VACCINES.
The first thing I am going to say about it is that these SECONDARY EFFECTS AND DEATHS, I do not invent them, they are well documented and I put in the first graphic ALL THE EFFECTS REPORTED BY COMPANY SANOFI, INC. Which are approximately 140 INCLUDING DEATH:
POST GARDASIL, CERVARIX SYNDROME ADVERSE REACTIONS
=======================================================
1.) ABORTION: STILBIRTH, MISCARRIAGE.
2.) ADDISON'S DISEASE.
3.) ADRENAL FAILURE.
4.) ALLERGIES.
5.) ANXIETY
6.) PANIC ATTACKS.
7.) APPETITE LOSS.
8.) ARTTHRITIS.
9.) ASTHMA ATTACKS.
10.) AUTISTIC -LIKE SYMPTOMS.
11.) AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES: LUPUS, MIXED CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASE.
12.) BACK PAIN.
13.) BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS.
14.) BLADDER ISSUES.
15.) BLEEDING GUMS.
16.) BLINDNESS.
17.) BLOATED. (SWELLING)
18.) BLOOD SUGAR ISSUES.
19.) BLOODY STOOLS
20.) BRAIN FOG.
21.) BRAIN INFLAMMATION.
22.) BRAIN LESIONS.
23.) BRONCHITIS.
24.) CERVICAL CANCER.
25.) CHEMICAL SENSIVITY.
26.) CHEST PAINS.
27.) CONVULSIONS (SEIZURES).
28.) CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME.
29.) CONSTIPATION.
30.) CYTOMEGALOVIRUS (CMV).
31.) DEATH.
32.) DEGENERATIVE DISK DISEASE.
33.) DEHYDRATION.
34.) DEPRESSION.
35.) DIABETES.
36.) DIARRHEA.
37.) DIZINESS.
38.) DYSLEXIA.
39.) DYSPLASIA
40.) EARLY ONSET OF MENOPAUSE.
41.) ENLARGED FALLOPIAN TUBES.
42.) ENLARGED LIVER.
43.) EPSTEIN BARR VIRUS. (EBV).
44.) EXTREME PAIN IN THE TAILBONE AREA..
45.) FAIINTING.
46.) FATIGUE.
47.) FERTILITY PROBLEMS.
48.) FEVER.
49.) BLISTERS.
50.) FIBROMYALGIA.
51.) FOOD ALLERGIES.
52.) GALLBLADDER ISSUES.
53.) GENITAL WARTS.
54.) GRAY FILM ON TEETH.
55.) GUILLAN BARRE SYNDROME.
56.) HAIR GROWT IN STRANGE PLACES.
57.) HAIR LOSS.
58.) HALLUCINATIONS.
59.) WEAKNES: HAND, LEG.
60.) HASIMOTO'S DISEASE.
61.) HEAD PRESSURE.
62.) HEADACHE.
63.) HEARING LOSS (PERMANENT), AND (TEMPORARY).
64.) HEARING SENSIVITY.
65.) HEART PALPITATIONS.
66.) HEART ARRHYTHMIA.
67.) HIGH LEVELS OF METALS IN BLOOD: ALUMINIUM, MERCURY.
68.) COLD INTOLERANCE.
69.) HPV.
70.) INFERTILITY.
71.) INSOMMIA.
72.) ITCHING.
73.) IUD DISCONFORT (INTRAUTERINE DEVICE).
74.) JOINT PAIN.
75.) KIDNEY FAILURE.
76.) KIDNEY ISSUES.
77.) KNEE PAIN.
78.) LEAKY GUT SYNDROME.
79.) LIGHT SENSIVITY.
80.) LIP SPOTS.
81.) LIVER FAILURE.
82.) LOSS OF BLADDER CONTROL.
83.) MEMORY LOSS (LONG- TERM), AND (SHORT -TERM)
84.) MENSTRUAL CYCLE CHANGES.
85.) METALLIC TASTE IN MOUTH.
85.) MIGRAINE.
86.) MOOD SWINGS.
87.) MOLES (INCREASING IN NUMBER OF).
88.) MONONUCLEOSIS.
89.) MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS(MS).
90.) MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS (MS) LIKE SYMPTOMS.
91.) MUSCLE ACHES.
92.) MUSCLE SPASMS.
93.) MUSCLE TENSION.
94.) NAUSEA.
95.) NEUROLOGICAL REACTIONS TO FUNGAL METABOLITES.
96.) NEUROLOGYCAL SYMPTOMS.
96.) NIGHTS SWEATS.
97.) NON HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA.
98.) NUMBNESS.
99.) OTHER TYPES OF CANCER.
100.) OVARIAN FAILURE.
101.) PALENESS.
102.) PARALYSIS.
103.) PINS / NEEDLES IN EXTREMITIES.
104.) PANCREATITIS.
105.) POLY-CYSTIC-OVARIAN SYNDORME (PCOS).
106.) PELVIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE.(PID).
107.) PELVIC PAIN.
108.) PERSONALITY CHANGES.
109.) PLEURAL EFFUSION.
110.) PNEUMONIA.
111.) POSTURAL ODTHOSTATIC TACHYCARDIA SYNDROME (ORTHOSTATIC INTOLERANCE).
112.) RANDOM TWITCHING OF EXTREMITIES.
113.) RASH
114.) RAYNAUD'S POHENOMENON (LOSS OF BLOOD CIRCULATION TO HAND AND / OR FEETS).
115.)o REGRESSION.
116.) RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS.
117.) RUPTURED OVARIAN CYSTS.
118.) / TEETH CHANGES.
119.) SENSIVITY TO COMMERCIALLY PROCESSED CITRIC ACID, MSG, SULFUR AND OTHER ADDITIVES.
120.) SEVERE NERVE PAIN SYNDROME.
121.) SHORTNESS OF BREATHS.
122.) SLEEP APNEA.
123.) SLURRED SPEECH.
124.) SMELL SENSIVITY.
125.) SORE THROAT.
126.) SOUND SENSIVITY.
127.) STOMACH ACHE AND PAIN.
128.) SUDDEN DROPS IN BLOOD PRESSURE,
129.) SWELLING / EDEMA SWOLLEN LYMPH NODES.
130.) THYROID ISSUES.
131.) THROMBOSIS.
132.) TOOTACHES.
133.) TREMORS: HANDS AND OR LEGS.
134.) UTERINE SPASMS.
135.) URINARY TRACT INFECTION (UTI).
136.) VISION CHANGES: LONG TERM VISION LOSS (PERMANENT) AND (TEMPORAY).
137.) VISION PROBLEMS: ABNORMAL PUPILLARY FUNCTION / DILATION.
138.) VOMITING BLOOD.
139.) WEIGHT GAIN.
140.) WEIGHT LOSS (20-30 LBS).
For the year 2.011, the same company reports in AUGUST 103 deaths and in October 104, and I quote:
".... According to SANE Vax Inc., VAERS researcher Janny Stokvis, there has been another increase in the injuries and adverse deaths from HPV vaccines since the last report published in August. HPV 2 Cervarix and HPV 4 Gardasil adverse reactions (injury reports estimated from 1 to 10% of the vaccinated population) as of October 11 with significant category increases compared to August 11, 2011 .... "See graph :
There are many ADVERSE EFFECTS attributed to these VACCINES and there is a worldwide campaign AGAINST them for the DEATHS CAUSED and the country COLOMBIA is not the only one to LAWSUIT the INVOLVED LABORATORIES.
In France, on November 24, 2.013, the SANOFI Laboratory was sued by a teenager affected by the GARDASIL Vaccine.
In the United States, December 31, 2.014, a Judicial Court forced Merck to pay 6 MILLION DOLLARS to 49 victims of HPV vaccination for collateral damages caused to vaccinates and are pending 200 more.
In Spain since the year 2.009 to 2.017, several demands have been made against HPV vaccines, by DEATH and adverse effects. Other countries where SEVERE CASES and DEATH have occurred include: Japan (60 girls), Denmark, the United States, Canada, Ireland, India, Sweden, and others.
The main symptoms presented by the more than 700 girls affected in COLOMBIA include, among others, syncope or fainting, autoimmune diseases, Guillain-Barret syndrome, dysautonomia, sclerosis, encephalitis, neuropathies, lupus / Sjogren, ovarian failure, fibromyalgia, ASIA syndrome (autoimmune / inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants), and even death.
The claim is based, in addition to THE DEATHS AND ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE AFFECTED, is the fact of: DEFECTIVE PRODUCT, where it is alleged that the vaccines "WERE NOT "SAFE" or the LABORATORY "FALSIFIED" the side effects of the same to achieve its APPROVAL AND SALE.
This is a high point and perhaps the one that has caused the WORLD'S GREATEST REJECTION to the new VACCINES, there are social groups who SUSPECT that were CREATED TO PRODUCE MONEY WITHOUT CARE about THE HEALTH OF THE VACCINATED people.
In the US in 1.986, a LAW was issued where the VICTIMS CAN NOT SUE DIRECTLY TO VACCINE MANUFACTURERS, but they should be compensated economically for the damages caused by them.
I hope this NEW REVIEW on the ADVERSE EFFECTS OF GARDASIL AND CERVARIX VACCINES AGAINST HPV will be of help and support to our COLOMBIAN brothers affected by it.
And I close this post telling everyone in the case of THESE "DEFECTIVE AND INEFFECTIVE VACCINES" ...
"...... THE LABORATORIES INVOLVED MUST WITHDRAW OF THE MARKET THESE VACCINES .... COMPENSATE ENCONOMICALLY THE AFFECTED .... AND THE BEST WAY TO FIGHT AGAINST THEM IS NOT TO USE THEM ... AND PUBLICALLY REPORT THE POSSIBLE RISK THAT YOU AND YOUR CHILDREN FACE, IF YOU TAKE IT .... "
Greetings to all.
Dr. José Lapenta.
EDITORIAL ESPAÑOL
===================
Hola amigos de la red DERMAGIC EXPRESS te trae hoy un tema bien caliente hoy día, de las VACUNAS GARDASIL Y CERVARIX creadas para prevenir el VPH, y que a nivel mundial están siendo altamente criticadas y cuestionadas por SUS EFECTOS ADVERSOS Y MUERTES OCASIONADAS. En este caso se trata del país COLOMBIA donde el LABORATORIO MERCK SHARP & DHOME FUE DEMANDADO POR 160 MILLONES DE DOLARES, por los daños ocasionados por la VACUNA GARDASIL a cientos de niñas colombianas.
Voy a comenzar este POST, diciendo una vez más que LOS LABORATORIOS farmacéuticos existen para CREAR e INVENTAR soluciones para la humanidad, bien sea mediante medicamentos para utilizar por vía oral, intramuscular, parenteral, vitaminas, etc. y VACUNAS. Esa es la MISION de todo laboratorio, Y CUANDO EL INVENTO O CREACION, léase, medicina vía ORAL, PARENTERAL o VACUNA produce DEMASIADOS EFECTOS ADVERSOS Y MATA a la población que las utiliza, por lo general y LLAMADO DEL DEBER, dicho MEDICAMENTO O VACUNA DEBE SER RETIRADO DEL MERCADO y las victimas compensadas económicamente, (si sobrevivieron al uso de ellas).
El día 2 de abril 2.017 lance a la red la publicación DOCE MEDICINAS FUERA DEL MERCADO, LAS 12 DEL PATIBULO, como ejemplo, enseñanza y documentación de 12 MEDICAMENTOS que fueron lanzados al mercado con grandes expectativas y luego tuvieron que ser retirados del mercado DEBIDO A SUS GRANDES EFECTOS ADVERSOS, INCLUSO MUERTE que puedes leer acá:
DOCE MEDICINAS FUERA DEL MERCADO, LAS DOCE DEL PATIBULO
El día 1 de Febrero de 2.017 lance a la red la publicación BUSCANDO UNA VACUNA PARA LA ENFERMEDAD DE LYME, actualización de la publicación ORIGINAL lanzada el 18 de febrero de 1.999 en el DERMAGIC EXPRESS ORIGINAL, (hace 16 años) la cual explica en pocas palabras como ESTA VACUNA denominada LYMERrix lanzada en 1.998 por el laboratorio GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) tuvo que ser retirada 4 años después POR SUS GRANDES EFECTOS ADVERSOS ocasionados a la población vacunada, la puedes leer aquí:
BUSCANDO UNA VACUNA PARA LA ENFERMEDAD DE LYME
Posteriormente el día 5 de Junio 2.017 lance otra publicación dedicada a la NUEVA VACUNA PARA LA ENFERMEDAD DE LYME la cual hoy días está siendo "probada" y se esperan sus resultados para será APROBADA O DENEGADA, la misma tiene sus seguidores y sus detractores, la puedes leer aquí
NUEVA VACUNA VL 15 PARA LA ENFERMEDAD DE LYME, NUEVO FRAUDE?
El día 27 de Mayo 2.017 hice otra publicación donde se relatan las HISTORIAS DE 12 CASOS AFECTADOS POR LA VACUNA LYMErix PARA LA ENFERMEDAD DE LYME con el objetivo de concientizar a la población en general DEL PELIGRO que significa una VACUNA que en vez de protegerte te ocasiona GRANDES EFECTOS ADVERSOS e incluso MUERTE, la cual puedes leer acá.
HISTORIA DE LAS VICTIMAS DE LA VACUNA PARA LA ENFERMEDAD DE LYME
El 24 de Junio 2.017 hago otra publicación bajo el nombre de VPH, VIRUS DEL PAPILOMA HUMANO, comportamiento en nuestro mundo, ANTES DE LAS VACUNAS (GARDASIL CERVARIX), la cual fue una ACTUALIZACION de la publicación original lanzada a la internet el 18 de agosto de 1.999 en el DERMAGIC EXPRESS ORIGINAL (hace 18 años), CUANDO LAS VACUNAS PARA EL VPH NO HABIAN LLEGADO y donde explico que la MORTALIDAD por VPH era causada principalmente por CANCER debido al descubrimiento de CEPAS ONCOGENICAS. La puedes leer aquí:
EL VPH, VIRUS DEL PAPILOMA HUMANO ANTES DE LAS VACUNAS
Posteriormente el día 1 de Julio 2.017 publico la segunda parte de la publicación previa bajo el nombre de VPH DESPUES DE LAS VACUNAS, DETENGAN EL GARDASIL Y CERVARIX, el cual trata el tema especifico de los EFECTOS SECUNDARIOS Y MUERTE CAUSADAS POR ESTAS VACUNAS en varios países del mundo y la puedes leer aquí:
VPH DESPUES DE LAS VACUNAS, DETENGAN EL GARDASIL Y CERVARIX
El día 15 Mayo de 2.002, hace 15 años, lance a la red la publicación AUTISMO TIMEROSAL Y VACUNAS, EN EL DERMAGIC EXPRESS Original, donde se trata el tema de que los coadyuvantes de las VACUNAS (PRESERVATIVOS, ADYUVANTES) PROBABLEMENTE estaban y están involucrados en el AUTISMO, tema controversial hoy día. Esta publicación la volví a lanzar en este WEB SITE el día 29 de enero de 2.017 sin modificaciones. Y la puedes leer aquí:
AUTISMO, TIMEROSAL Y VACUNAS.
En el año 2.007- 2.009 explota a nivel mundial la PANDEMIA DE LA GRIPE AH1N1 y con motivo de ella, lance a la red en EL DERMAGIC EXPRESS ORIGINAL 3 publicaciones sobre este tema bajo el nombre de H1N1 EL HUESPED DIABOLICO, donde queda develado toda la trama e intriga que estaba detrás de esta gripe Y LAS VACUNAS que fueron INVENTADAS para ella, los EFECTOS SECUNDARIOS DE estas VACUNAS. Los links en español e ingles sobre dos de las publicaciones, las puedes leer aqui:
H1N1 EL HUESPED DIABOLICO, EN LA VIA HACIA UNA GUERRA VIROLOGICA
GRIPE H1N1, VIRUS Y VACUNAS EXPEDIENTES SECRETOS
Con esto quiero decirte de una manera CLARA y OBJETIVA, que yo tengo más de 15 años indagando y publicando VERDADES sobre MEDICAMENTOS Y VACUNAS, y por ello antes de continuar te coloque "ALGUNOS" de los grandes detalles que he averiguado sobre estos CONTROVERSIALES TEMAS.
Entonces el día 18 de agosto de 2.017 me consigo en la red esta publicación:
DEMANDA POR $160 MILLONES DE DOLARES CONTRA MERCK POR DAÑOS CAUSADOS POR LA VACUNA GARDASIL EN COLOMBIA, la cual fue introducida el 4 de Agosto, por los daños causados a las personas vacunadas contra el VPH por la VACUNA GARDASIL del laboratorio MERCK SHARP & DHOME, la cual me llevo a realizar esta nueva revisión sobre los EFECTOS ADVERSOS y MUERTES OCASIONAS POR ESTAS VACUNAS GARDASIL Y CERVARIX.
Lo primero que te voy a decir al respecto es que ESTOS EFECTOS SECUNDARIOS Y MUERTES no las invente yo, están bien documentados y te coloque en la entrada TODOS LOS EFECTOS REPORTADOS POR LA COMPAÑIA SANOFI, INC. Los cuales son aproximadamente 140 INCLUYENDO MUERTE.
=======================================================
1.) ABORTION: STILBIRTH, MISCARRIAGE.
2.) ADDISON'S DISEASE.
3.) ADRENAL FAILURE.
4.) ALLERGIES.
5.) ANXIETY
6.) PANIC ATTACKS.
7.) APPETITE LOSS.
8.) ARTTHRITIS.
9.) ASTHMA ATTACKS.
10.) AUTISTIC -LIKE SYMPTOMS.
11.) AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES: LUPUS, MIXED CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASE.
12.) BACK PAIN.
13.) BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS.
14.) BLADDER ISSUES.
15.) BLEEDING GUMS.
16.) BLINDNESS.
17.) BLOATED. (SWELLING)
18.) BLOOD SUGAR ISSUES.
19.) BLOODY STOOLS
20.) BRAIN FOG.
21.) BRAIN INFLAMMATION.
22.) BRAIN LESIONS.
23.) BRONCHITIS.
24.) CERVICAL CANCER.
25.) CHEMICAL SENSIVITY.
26.) CHEST PAINS.
27.) CONVULSIONS (SEIZURES).
28.) CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME.
29.) CONSTIPATION.
30.) CYTOMEGALOVIRUS (CMV).
31.) DEATH.
32.) DEGENERATIVE DISK DISEASE.
33.) DEHYDRATION.
34.) DEPRESSION.
35.) DIABETES.
36.) DIARRHEA.
37.) DIZINESS.
38.) DYSLEXIA.
39.) DYSPLASIA
40.) EARLY ONSET OF MENOPAUSE.
41.) ENLARGED FALLOPIAN TUBES.
42.) ENLARGED LIVER.
43.) EPSTEIN BARR VIRUS. (EBV).
44.) EXTREME PAIN IN THE TAILBONE AREA..
45.) FAIINTING.
46.) FATIGUE.
47.) FERTILITY PROBLEMS.
48.) FEVER.
49.) BLISTERS.
50.) FIBROMYALGIA.
51.) FOOD ALLERGIES.
52.) GALLBLADDER ISSUES.
53.) GENITAL WARTS.
54.) GRAY FILM ON TEETH.
55.) GUILLAN BARRE SYNDROME.
56.) HAIR GROWT IN STRANGE PLACES.
57.) HAIR LOSS.
58.) HALLUCINATIONS.
59.) WEAKNES: HAND, LEG.
60.) HASIMOTO'S DISEASE.
61.) HEAD PRESSURE.
62.) HEADACHE.
63.) HEARING LOSS (PERMANENT), AND (TEMPORARY).
64.) HEARING SENSIVITY.
65.) HEART PALPITATIONS.
66.) HEART ARRHYTHMIA.
67.) HIGH LEVELS OF METALS IN BLOOD: ALUMINIUM, MERCURY.
68.) COLD INTOLERANCE.
69.) HPV.
70.) INFERTILITY.
71.) INSOMMIA.
72.) ITCHING.
73.) IUD DISCONFORT (INTRAUTERINE DEVICE).
74.) JOINT PAIN.
75.) KIDNEY FAILURE.
76.) KIDNEY ISSUES.
77.) KNEE PAIN.
78.) LEAKY GUT SYNDROME.
79.) LIGHT SENSIVITY.
80.) LIP SPOTS.
81.) LIVER FAILURE.
82.) LOSS OF BLADDER CONTROL.
83.) MEMORY LOSS (LONG- TERM), AND (SHORT -TERM)
84.) MENSTRUAL CYCLE CHANGES.
85.) METALLIC TASTE IN MOUTH.
85.) MIGRAINE.
86.) MOOD SWINGS.
87.) MOLES (INCREASING IN NUMBER OF).
88.) MONONUCLEOSIS.
89.) MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS(MS).
90.) MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS (MS) LIKE SYMPTOMS.
91.) MUSCLE ACHES.
92.) MUSCLE SPASMS.
93.) MUSCLE TENSION.
94.) NAUSEA.
95.) NEUROLOGICAL REACTIONS TO FUNGAL METABOLITES.
96.) NEUROLOGYCAL SYMPTOMS.
96.) NIGHTS SWEATS.
97.) NON HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA.
98.) NUMBNESS.
99.) OTHER TYPES OF CANCER.
100.) OVARIAN FAILURE.
101.) PALENESS.
102.) PARALYSIS.
103.) PINS / NEEDLES IN EXTREMITIES.
104.) PANCREATITIS.
105.) POLY-CYSTIC-OVARIAN SYNDORME (PCOS).
106.) PELVIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE.(PID).
107.) PELVIC PAIN.
108.) PERSONALITY CHANGES.
109.) PLEURAL EFFUSION.
110.) PNEUMONIA.
111.) POSTURAL ODTHOSTATIC TACHYCARDIA SYNDROME (ORTHOSTATIC INTOLERANCE).
112.) RANDOM TWITCHING OF EXTREMITIES.
113.) RASH
114.) RAYNAUD'S POHENOMENON (LOSS OF BLOOD CIRCULATION TO HAND AND / OR FEETS).
115.)o REGRESSION.
116.) RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS.
117.) RUPTURED OVARIAN CYSTS.
118.) / TEETH CHANGES.
119.) SENSIVITY TO COMMERCIALLY PROCESSED CITRIC ACID, MSG, SULFUR AND OTHER ADDITIVES.
120.) SEVERE NERVE PAIN SYNDROME.
121.) SHORTNESS OF BREATHS.
122.) SLEEP APNEA.
123.) SLURRED SPEECH.
124.) SMELL SENSIVITY.
125.) SORE THROAT.
126.) SOUND SENSIVITY.
127.) STOMACH ACHE AND PAIN.
128.) SUDDEN DROPS IN BLOOD PRESSURE,
129.) SWELLING / EDEMA SWOLLEN LYMPH NODES.
130.) THYROID ISSUES.
131.) THROMBOSIS.
132.) TOOTACHES.
133.) TREMORS: HANDS AND OR LEGS.
134.) UTERINE SPASMS.
135.) URINARY TRACT INFECTION (UTI).
136.) VISION CHANGES: LONG TERM VISION LOSS (PERMANENT) AND (TEMPORAY).
137.) VISION PROBLEMS: ABNORMAL PUPILLARY FUNCTION / DILATION.
138.) VOMITING BLOOD.
139.) WEIGHT GAIN.
140.) WEIGHT LOSS (20-30 LBS).
For the year 2.011, the same company reports in AUGUST 103 deaths and in October 104, and I quote:
".... According to SANE Vax Inc., VAERS researcher Janny Stokvis, there has been another increase in the injuries and adverse deaths from HPV vaccines since the last report published in August. HPV 2 Cervarix and HPV 4 Gardasil adverse reactions (injury reports estimated from 1 to 10% of the vaccinated population) as of October 11 with significant category increases compared to August 11, 2011 .... "See graph :
In France, on November 24, 2.013, the SANOFI Laboratory was sued by a teenager affected by the GARDASIL Vaccine.
In the United States, December 31, 2.014, a Judicial Court forced Merck to pay 6 MILLION DOLLARS to 49 victims of HPV vaccination for collateral damages caused to vaccinates and are pending 200 more.
In Spain since the year 2.009 to 2.017, several demands have been made against HPV vaccines, by DEATH and adverse effects. Other countries where SEVERE CASES and DEATH have occurred include: Japan (60 girls), Denmark, the United States, Canada, Ireland, India, Sweden, and others.
The main symptoms presented by the more than 700 girls affected in COLOMBIA include, among others, syncope or fainting, autoimmune diseases, Guillain-Barret syndrome, dysautonomia, sclerosis, encephalitis, neuropathies, lupus / Sjogren, ovarian failure, fibromyalgia, ASIA syndrome (autoimmune / inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants), and even death.
The claim is based, in addition to THE DEATHS AND ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE AFFECTED, is the fact of: DEFECTIVE PRODUCT, where it is alleged that the vaccines "WERE NOT "SAFE" or the LABORATORY "FALSIFIED" the side effects of the same to achieve its APPROVAL AND SALE.
This is a high point and perhaps the one that has caused the WORLD'S GREATEST REJECTION to the new VACCINES, there are social groups who SUSPECT that were CREATED TO PRODUCE MONEY WITHOUT CARE about THE HEALTH OF THE VACCINATED people.
In the US in 1.986, a LAW was issued where the VICTIMS CAN NOT SUE DIRECTLY TO VACCINE MANUFACTURERS, but they should be compensated economically for the damages caused by them.
I hope this NEW REVIEW on the ADVERSE EFFECTS OF GARDASIL AND CERVARIX VACCINES AGAINST HPV will be of help and support to our COLOMBIAN brothers affected by it.
And I close this post telling everyone in the case of THESE "DEFECTIVE AND INEFFECTIVE VACCINES" ...
"...... THE LABORATORIES INVOLVED MUST WITHDRAW OF THE MARKET THESE VACCINES .... COMPENSATE ENCONOMICALLY THE AFFECTED .... AND THE BEST WAY TO FIGHT AGAINST THEM IS NOT TO USE THEM ... AND PUBLICALLY REPORT THE POSSIBLE RISK THAT YOU AND YOUR CHILDREN FACE, IF YOU TAKE IT .... "
Greetings to all.
Dr. José Lapenta.
EDITORIAL ESPAÑOL
===================
Hola amigos de la red DERMAGIC EXPRESS te trae hoy un tema bien caliente hoy día, de las VACUNAS GARDASIL Y CERVARIX creadas para prevenir el VPH, y que a nivel mundial están siendo altamente criticadas y cuestionadas por SUS EFECTOS ADVERSOS Y MUERTES OCASIONADAS. En este caso se trata del país COLOMBIA donde el LABORATORIO MERCK SHARP & DHOME FUE DEMANDADO POR 160 MILLONES DE DOLARES, por los daños ocasionados por la VACUNA GARDASIL a cientos de niñas colombianas.
Voy a comenzar este POST, diciendo una vez más que LOS LABORATORIOS farmacéuticos existen para CREAR e INVENTAR soluciones para la humanidad, bien sea mediante medicamentos para utilizar por vía oral, intramuscular, parenteral, vitaminas, etc. y VACUNAS. Esa es la MISION de todo laboratorio, Y CUANDO EL INVENTO O CREACION, léase, medicina vía ORAL, PARENTERAL o VACUNA produce DEMASIADOS EFECTOS ADVERSOS Y MATA a la población que las utiliza, por lo general y LLAMADO DEL DEBER, dicho MEDICAMENTO O VACUNA DEBE SER RETIRADO DEL MERCADO y las victimas compensadas económicamente, (si sobrevivieron al uso de ellas).
El día 2 de abril 2.017 lance a la red la publicación DOCE MEDICINAS FUERA DEL MERCADO, LAS 12 DEL PATIBULO, como ejemplo, enseñanza y documentación de 12 MEDICAMENTOS que fueron lanzados al mercado con grandes expectativas y luego tuvieron que ser retirados del mercado DEBIDO A SUS GRANDES EFECTOS ADVERSOS, INCLUSO MUERTE que puedes leer acá:
DOCE MEDICINAS FUERA DEL MERCADO, LAS DOCE DEL PATIBULO
El día 1 de Febrero de 2.017 lance a la red la publicación BUSCANDO UNA VACUNA PARA LA ENFERMEDAD DE LYME, actualización de la publicación ORIGINAL lanzada el 18 de febrero de 1.999 en el DERMAGIC EXPRESS ORIGINAL, (hace 16 años) la cual explica en pocas palabras como ESTA VACUNA denominada LYMERrix lanzada en 1.998 por el laboratorio GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) tuvo que ser retirada 4 años después POR SUS GRANDES EFECTOS ADVERSOS ocasionados a la población vacunada, la puedes leer aquí:
BUSCANDO UNA VACUNA PARA LA ENFERMEDAD DE LYME
Posteriormente el día 5 de Junio 2.017 lance otra publicación dedicada a la NUEVA VACUNA PARA LA ENFERMEDAD DE LYME la cual hoy días está siendo "probada" y se esperan sus resultados para será APROBADA O DENEGADA, la misma tiene sus seguidores y sus detractores, la puedes leer aquí
NUEVA VACUNA VL 15 PARA LA ENFERMEDAD DE LYME, NUEVO FRAUDE?
El día 27 de Mayo 2.017 hice otra publicación donde se relatan las HISTORIAS DE 12 CASOS AFECTADOS POR LA VACUNA LYMErix PARA LA ENFERMEDAD DE LYME con el objetivo de concientizar a la población en general DEL PELIGRO que significa una VACUNA que en vez de protegerte te ocasiona GRANDES EFECTOS ADVERSOS e incluso MUERTE, la cual puedes leer acá.
HISTORIA DE LAS VICTIMAS DE LA VACUNA PARA LA ENFERMEDAD DE LYME
El 24 de Junio 2.017 hago otra publicación bajo el nombre de VPH, VIRUS DEL PAPILOMA HUMANO, comportamiento en nuestro mundo, ANTES DE LAS VACUNAS (GARDASIL CERVARIX), la cual fue una ACTUALIZACION de la publicación original lanzada a la internet el 18 de agosto de 1.999 en el DERMAGIC EXPRESS ORIGINAL (hace 18 años), CUANDO LAS VACUNAS PARA EL VPH NO HABIAN LLEGADO y donde explico que la MORTALIDAD por VPH era causada principalmente por CANCER debido al descubrimiento de CEPAS ONCOGENICAS. La puedes leer aquí:
EL VPH, VIRUS DEL PAPILOMA HUMANO ANTES DE LAS VACUNAS
Posteriormente el día 1 de Julio 2.017 publico la segunda parte de la publicación previa bajo el nombre de VPH DESPUES DE LAS VACUNAS, DETENGAN EL GARDASIL Y CERVARIX, el cual trata el tema especifico de los EFECTOS SECUNDARIOS Y MUERTE CAUSADAS POR ESTAS VACUNAS en varios países del mundo y la puedes leer aquí:
VPH DESPUES DE LAS VACUNAS, DETENGAN EL GARDASIL Y CERVARIX
El día 15 Mayo de 2.002, hace 15 años, lance a la red la publicación AUTISMO TIMEROSAL Y VACUNAS, EN EL DERMAGIC EXPRESS Original, donde se trata el tema de que los coadyuvantes de las VACUNAS (PRESERVATIVOS, ADYUVANTES) PROBABLEMENTE estaban y están involucrados en el AUTISMO, tema controversial hoy día. Esta publicación la volví a lanzar en este WEB SITE el día 29 de enero de 2.017 sin modificaciones. Y la puedes leer aquí:
AUTISMO, TIMEROSAL Y VACUNAS.
En el año 2.007- 2.009 explota a nivel mundial la PANDEMIA DE LA GRIPE AH1N1 y con motivo de ella, lance a la red en EL DERMAGIC EXPRESS ORIGINAL 3 publicaciones sobre este tema bajo el nombre de H1N1 EL HUESPED DIABOLICO, donde queda develado toda la trama e intriga que estaba detrás de esta gripe Y LAS VACUNAS que fueron INVENTADAS para ella, los EFECTOS SECUNDARIOS DE estas VACUNAS. Los links en español e ingles sobre dos de las publicaciones, las puedes leer aqui:
H1N1 EL HUESPED DIABOLICO, EN LA VIA HACIA UNA GUERRA VIROLOGICA
GRIPE H1N1, VIRUS Y VACUNAS EXPEDIENTES SECRETOS
Con esto quiero decirte de una manera CLARA y OBJETIVA, que yo tengo más de 15 años indagando y publicando VERDADES sobre MEDICAMENTOS Y VACUNAS, y por ello antes de continuar te coloque "ALGUNOS" de los grandes detalles que he averiguado sobre estos CONTROVERSIALES TEMAS.
Entonces el día 18 de agosto de 2.017 me consigo en la red esta publicación:
DEMANDA POR $160 MILLONES DE DOLARES CONTRA MERCK POR DAÑOS CAUSADOS POR LA VACUNA GARDASIL EN COLOMBIA, la cual fue introducida el 4 de Agosto, por los daños causados a las personas vacunadas contra el VPH por la VACUNA GARDASIL del laboratorio MERCK SHARP & DHOME, la cual me llevo a realizar esta nueva revisión sobre los EFECTOS ADVERSOS y MUERTES OCASIONAS POR ESTAS VACUNAS GARDASIL Y CERVARIX.
Lo primero que te voy a decir al respecto es que ESTOS EFECTOS SECUNDARIOS Y MUERTES no las invente yo, están bien documentados y te coloque en la entrada TODOS LOS EFECTOS REPORTADOS POR LA COMPAÑIA SANOFI, INC. Los cuales son aproximadamente 140 INCLUYENDO MUERTE.
POST GARDASIL, CERVARIX SÍNDROME REACCIONES ADVERSAS
===========================================================
1.) ABORTO: NACIMIENTO MUERTO, ABORTO ESPONTANEO.
2.) ENFERMEDAD DE ADDISON.
3.) FALLO ADRENAL.
4.) ALERGIAS.
5.) ANSIEDAD
6.) ATAQUES DE PÁNICO.
7.) PÉRDIDA APETITO.
8.) ARTTRITIS.
9.) ATAQUES DE ASMA.
10.) SINTOMAS DE AUTISTIMO-LÍKE.
11.) ENFERMEDADES AUTOINMUNES: LUPUS, ENFERMEDAD MIXTA DEL TEJIDO CONECTIVO.
12.) DOLOR DE LA ESPALDA.
13.) VAGINOSIS BACTERIANA.
14.) CUELLO UTERINO PROBLEMAS.
15.) SANGRADO DE ENCIAS
16.) CEGUERA.
17.) HINCHAZON.
18.) PROBLEMAS DEL AZÚCAR SANGUÍNEO.
19.) SANGRE EN HECES.
20.) "NIEBLA" DEL CEREBRO: OBNUBILACION
21.) INFLAMACIÓN DEL CEREBRO.
22.) LESIONES DEL CEREBRO.
23.) BRONQUITIS
24.) CÁNCER CERVICAL.
25.) SENSIBILIDAD QUÍMICA.
26.) DOLORES DEL PECHO.
27.) CONVULSIONES.
28.) SÍNDROME DE FATIGA CRÓNICA.
29.) CONSTIPACIÓN.
30.) CYTOMEGALOVIRUS (CMV).
31.) MUERTE.
32.) ENFERMEDAD DEGENERATIVA DEL DISCO EN COLUMNA.
33.) DESHIDRATACIÓN.
34.) DEPRESIÓN.
35.) DIABETES.
36.) DIARREA.
37.) MAREOS.
38.) DISLEXIA.
39.) DISPLASIA
40.) ANTICIPACION DE LA MENOPAUSIA.
41.) ALTERACION DE LAS TROMPAS DE FALLOPIO.
42.) HEPATOMEGALIA.
43.) EPSTEIN BARR VIRUS. (EBV).
44.) DOLOR EXTREMO EN EL ÁREA DEL TALON.
45.) DEBILIDAD.
46.) FATIGA.
47.) PROBLEMAS DE LA FERTILIDAD.
48.) FIEBRE.
49.) AMPOLLAS.
50.) FIBROMIALGIA.
51.) ALERGIAS ALIMENTARIAS.
52.) PROBLEMAS DE LA VESICULA.
53.) VERRUGAS GENITALES.
54.) PELÍCULA GRIS SOBRE LOS DIENTES.
55.) SÍNDROME DE GUILLAN BARRE.
56.) CRECIMIENTO DE VELLO EN LUGARES EXTRAÑOS.
57.) PÉRDIDA DEL CABELLO.
58.) ALUCINACIONES.
59.) DEBILIDAD: MANO, PIERNA.
60.) ENFERMEDAD DE HASIMOTO.
61.) PRESIÓN EN LA CABEZA.
62.) DOLOR DE CABEZA.
63.) PÉRDIDA AUDITIVA (PERMANENTE), Y (TEMPORAL).
64.) SENSIBILIDAD AUDITIVA.
65.) PALPITACIONES.
66.) ARRITMIA CARDIACA.
67.) ALTOS NIVELES DE METALES EN SANGRE: ALUMINIO, MERCURIO.
68.) INTOLERANCIA AL FRIO.
69.) VPH.
70.) INFERTILIDAD.
71.) INSOMNIO.
72.) PICAZON O COEMZON.
73.) DISCONFORT DEL DIU (DISPOSITIVO INTRAUTERINO).
74.) DOLOR DE LAS ARTICULACIONES.
75.) FALLO RENAL.
76.) PROBLEMAS RENALES.
77.) DOLOR DE RODILLA.
78.) SÍNDROME DE INTESTINO PERFORADO.
79.) SENSIBILIDAD A LA LUZ.
80.) MANCHAS LABIALES.
81.) FINSUFICIANCIA HEPATICA.
82.) PÉRDIDA DEL CONTROL DE LA VEJIGA.
83.) PÉRDIDA DE MEMORIA (A LARGO PLAZO) Y (A CORTO PLAZO)
84.) CAMBIOS DEL CICLO MENSTRUAL.
85.) SABOR METÁLICO EN LA BOCA.
85.) MIGRAÑA.
86.) CAMBIOS DEL HUMOR
87.) LUNARES (AUMENTO EN NÚMERO).
88.) MONONUCLEOSIS.
89.) ESCLEROSIS MÚLTIPLE (MS).
90.) ESCLEROSIS MÚLTIPLE (MS) LIKE SÍNTOMAS.
91.) DOLORES MUSCULARES
92.) ESPASMOS MUSCULARES.
93.) TENSIÓN MUSCULAR.
94.) NAUSEA.
95.) REACCIONES NEUROLÓGICAS A LOS METABOLITOS FUNGICOS.
96.) SINTOMAS NEUROLÓGICOS.
96.) SUDORACION NOCTURNA.
97.) LINFOMA NO HODGKIN.
98.) ENTUMECIMIENTO.
99.) OTROS TIPOS DE CÁNCER.
100.) FALLA OVARIANA.
101.) PALIDEZ
102.) PARÁLISIS.
103.) SENSACION DE AGUJAS EN EXTREMIDADES.
104.) PANCREATITIS.
105.) SÍNDROME DE OVARIO POLIQUÍSTICO(PCOS).
106.) ENFERMEDAD INFLAMATORIA PELVICA (PID).
107.) DOLOR PELVICO.
108.) CAMBIOS DE PERSONALIDAD.
109.) DERRAME PLEURAL.
110.) NEUMONIA.
111.) SÍNDROME POSTURAL DE TAQUICARDIA ORTOSTÁTICA (INTOLERANCIA ORTOSTATICA).
112.) MOVIMIENTO INVOLUNTARIO Y ALEATORIO DE EXTREMIDADES.
113.) RASH
114.) FENOMENOE RAYNAUD (PÉRDIDA DE CIRCULACIÓN SANGUÍNEA A MANO Y / O PIES).
115.) REGRESIÓN.
116.) ARTRITIS REUMATOIDE.
117.) RUPTURA DE QUISTE OVARICO..
118.) CAMBIOS EN LOS DIENTES.
119.) SENSIBILIDAD A ACIDO CÍTRICO PROCESADO COMERCIALMENTE, MSG, AZUFRE Y OTROS ADITIVOS.
120.) SÍNDROME DE DOLOR SEVERO NEURAL.
121.) ACORTAMIENTO DE LA RESPIRACION.
122.) APNEA NOCTURNAL..
123.) DIFICULTAD PARA HABLAR.
124.0 SENSIBILIDAD DEL OLfato
125.) ULCERAS EN LA GARGANTA.
126.) SENSIBILIDAD AL SONIDO.
127.) DOLOR DE ESTOMAGO.
128.) CAIDA SUBITA DE LA PRESION SANGUINEA.
129.) EDEMA E INFLAMACION DE GANGLIOS LINFATICOS.
130.) PROBLEMAS TIROIDEOS.
131.) TROMBOSIS.
132.) DOLOR DENTAL.
133.) TREMOR: MANOS Y O PIERNAS.
134.) ESPASMOS UTERINOS.
135.) INFECCIÓN DEL TRACTOS URINARIOS (UTI).
136.) CAMBIOS DE VISIÓN: PÉRDIDA DE VISIÓN A LARGO PLAZO (PERMANENTE) Y (TEMPORAL).
137.) PROBLEMAS DE LA VISION: DILATACION PUPILAR ANORMAL.
138.) VOMITOS CON SANGRE.
139.) GANANCIA DE PESO.
140.) PÉRDIDA DE PESO (20-30 LBS).
Para el año 2.011, la misma compañía reporta en AGOSTO 103 muertes y en Octubre 104 ocasionadas, y cito textualmente:
"....De acuerdo con SANE Vax Inc., el investigador de VAERS, Janny Stokvis, ha habido otro aumento en las lesiones y muertes adversas de las vacunas contra el VPH desde el último informe publicado en agosto. Los datos a continuación para HPV 2 Cervarix y HPV 4 Gardasil reacciones adversas (informes de lesiones estimados de 1 a 10% de la población vacunada) a partir del 11 de octubre con aumentos significativos categoría en comparación con el 11 de agosto de 2011...." ver grafica:
En Francia, el 24 de Noviembre de 2.013 el Laboratorio SANOFI fue demandado por un adolescente afectado por la Vacuna GARDASIL.
En estados Unidos 31 de Diciembre 2.014 una Corte Judicial obligo a Merck a pagar 6 MILLONES DE DOLARES a 49 víctimas de la VACUNA CONTRA EL VPH por daños colaterales causados a los vacunados y están pendiente 200 más.
En España desde el año 2.009-2.017 se ha realizado varias demandas CONTRA LAS VACUNAS DEL VPH, por MUERTE y efectos adversos. Otros países donde se han presentado CASOS SEVEROS y MUERTE incluyen: Japón (60 niñas), Dinamarca, Estados Unidos, Canadá, Irlanda, India, Suecia, y otros.
Los principales síntomas presentados por las mas de 700 NIÑAS afectadas en COLOMBIA INCLUYEN, entre otros, síncope o desmayo, enfermedades autoinmunes, síndrome de Guillain-Barret, disautonomía, esclerosis, encefalitis, neuropatías, lupus/Sjogren, insuficiencia ovárica, fibromialgia, síndrome ASIA (síndrome autoinmune/inflamatorio inducido por adyuvantes), e incluso la muerte.
La demanda está basada, además de LAS MUERTES Y EFECTOS ADVERSOS A LOS AFECTADOS, es el hecho de: PRODUCTO DEFECTUOSO, donde se alega que las vacunas "NO ERAN SEGURAS" o el LABORATORIO "FALSIFICO" los efectos colaterales de las mismas para lograr su APROBACION Y VENTA.
Este es un punto álgido y quizá el que ha provocado MAYOR RECHAZO MUNDIAL a las nuevas VACUNAS, hay grupos sociales quienes SOSTIENEN que FUERON CREADAS PARA PRODUCIR DINERO sin IMPORTAR LA SALUD DE los VACUNADOS.
En ESTADOS UNIDOS en él año 1.986 se emitió una LEY donde NO SE PUEDE DEMANDAR DIRECTAMENTE A LOS FABRICANTES DE VACUNAS por las VICTIMAS, pero si compensarlas económicamente por los daños ocasionados por las mismas.
Espero que esta NUEVA REVISION sobre los EFECTOS ADVERSOS DE LAS VACUNAS GARDASIL Y CERVARIX CONTRA EL VPH, sirvan de ayuda y soporte a nuestros hermanos COLOMBIANOS afectados por la misma.
Y cierro este post diciéndoles a todos en el caso de ESTAS "DEFECTUOSAS E INEFICACES VACUNAS"...
"...... LOS LABORATORIOS INVOLUCRADOS DEBEN RETIRAR DEL MERCADO ESTAS VACUNAS....COMPENSAR ECONOMICAMENTE A LOS AFECTADOS....Y LA MEJOR MANERA DE LUCHAR CONTRA ELLAS ES NO UTILIZARLAS...Y DENUNCIAR PUBLICAMENTE EL POSIBLE RIESGO AL QUE TE ENFRENTAS TU Y TUS NIÑOS, SI TE LA COLOCAS...."
Saludos a Todos.
Dr. José Lapenta.
=======================================================================
REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRAFICAS/ BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES
=======================================================================
REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRAFICAS/ BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES
=======================================================================
1.) Demanda por $160 millones de dólares contra Merck por daños causados por la vacuna Gardasil en Colombia
2.) $ 160 million lawsuit against Merck for damages caused by the Gardasil vaccine in Colombia
3.) U.S. court pays $6 million to Gardasil victims
4.) Two Cases of Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis Following Vaccination Against Human Papilloma Virus.
3.) Sanofi sued in France over Gardasil vaccine
5.) HPV Vaccine: Death in Spain / April 16, 2017
6.) New Death Post-Gardasil Updated VAERS Figures & Report that HPV Vaccines Adverse Reactions are 50% Higher than other Age- Related Recommended Vaccines
==================================================================
=======================================================================
1.) Demanda por $160 millones de dólares contra Merck por daños causados por la vacuna Gardasil en Colombia
=======================================================================
Source:https://www.las2orillas.co/demanda-160-millones-dolares-merck-danos-causados-la-vacuna-gardasil-colombia/
“La vacuna, dice el fabricante, sirve para prevenir el cáncer uterino, cosa que jamás ha probado, ya que se necesitarían décadas para saberlo”
Por: Mario Lamo Jiménez | Agosto 18, 2017
El pasado 4 de agosto se presentó ante la justicia colombiana una demanda contra la multinacional Merck Sharp and Dhome por $160 millones de dólares por los daños causados por la vacuna Gardasil en este país. La abogada, Mónica León del Río, presentó la demanda ya que en Colombia más de 700 niñas han sufrido los efectos colaterales de la vacuna Gardasil, los cuales incluyen, entre otros, síncope o desmayo, enfermedades autoinmunes, síndrome de Guillain-Barret, disautonomía, esclerosis, encefalitis, neuropatías, lupus/Sjogren, insuficiencia ovárica, fibromialgia, síndrome ASIA (síndrome autoinmune/inflamatorio inducido por adyuvantes), e incluso la muerte. (Ver)
Esta demanda es de especial importancia ya que esta vacuna se aplica en muchos países y decenas de miles de niñas han sido afectadas por sus debilitantes e incapacitantes efectos colaterales y muchas han muerto a causa de la misma. La vacuna, dice el fabricante, sirve para prevenir el cáncer uterino, cosa que jamás ha probado, ya que se necesitarían décadas para saberlo y por el momento tal prevención es solo un asunto de fe. La cruda realidad es que la vacuna es insegura y que el fabricante prácticamente falsificó las pruebas de la misma para ocultar su peligrosidad. Los efectos colaterales de la vacuna se encuentran científicamente documentados en estudios médicos independientes (no pagados por el fabricante), entre ellos los llevados a cabo por el Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld y otros, que aparecieran en el libro Vaccines and Autoimmunity, publicado en 2015 por Wiley-Blackwell.
Por este motivo, entrevisté a la abogada Mónica León del Río, quien nos respondió así acerca de la demanda:
¿En qué consiste la demanda presentada contra Merck Sharp and Dhome?
ML: La acción de grupo presentada contra la multinacional Merck Sharp and Dhome el pasado 4 de agosto, es básicamente una acción que recoge a un colectivo, el colectivo de niñas, adolescentes y mujeres que se han visto perjudicadas por los efectos adversos de la vacuna contra el virus del papiloma humano, Gardasil. La peculiaridad de una acción de grupo como la que nos ocupa, es la dimensión en el número de víctimas que la conforman, la unicidad de sintomatología y diagnóstico de cada víctima. Esta acción va a desarrollar un tema muy poco tocado en Colombia que se denomina ´responsabilidad por producto defectuoso´.
¿Por qué se tuvo que llegar a esta instancia?
ML: En Colombia, al igual que en todas partes del mundo, se han agotado todas las instancias para poder denunciar los efectos adversos producidos por Gardasil. Ni las autoridades sanitarias ni los miembros de los grupos de medicina de los países en donde se han denunciado los efectos adversos ni la multinacional fabricante del producto han dado respuesta y de manera permanente han estigmatizado a las víctimas manifestando que no tienen ningún componente de daño orgánico y que se trata de un caso de “psicogenia”.
Es particular ver cómo el tema de la psicogenia es un tema que ha sido tratado en todas las partes donde ha habido efectos adversos significativos. Tenemos el caso del Japón, Reino Unido, Dinamarca, Estados Unidos, y siempre el elemento común que las autoridades de salud, permeadas por la multinacional que fabrica el producto, ha sido establecer un tema de piscogenia cuando se están presentando ante las autoridades historias clínicas perfectamente documentadas sobre las enfermedades autoinmunes y neurológicas de las menores.
Por esa circunstancia en Colombia, desde el inicio de mi actividad de denuncia social y judicial, e instaurado y presentado al gobierno nacional los efectos adversos, las tablas con las historias clínicas de las menores y esto no fue respondido de manera adecuada ni se establecieron tratamientos para las niñas. Se ha presentado acciones de tutela con el fin de garantizar el derecho constitucional a la salud y tampoco se les han dado cumplimiento.
¿Puedes darnos un ejemplo de una tutela que no se haya cumplido en este caso?
ML: Por ejemplo, la tutela del Carmen de Bolívar fue una tutela que se ganó ante el Consejo de Estado Colombiano, que es el máximo organismo contencioso, esta tutela tiene ya dos años de haber salido la sentencia y a las niñas del Carmen de Bolívar que forman parte de esta tutela no se les ha dado tratamiento ninguno, ni se les ha emitido diagnóstico, esto empeora la situación de salud de las menores y las enfermedades han venido avanzando significativamente, causando la muerte de muchas de ellas.
¿Puedes ampliar un poco el tema de la demanda por “producto defectuoso”?
ML: Esta es una demanda que tiene un componente peculiar en materia de responsabilidad, denominado “responsabilidad por producto defectuoso”. Dicha responsabilidad tiene lugar cuando un producto que sale al mercado, al que tiene acceso el consumidor, en este caso las consumidoras son las niñas y adolescentes colombianas, genera un daño por ser un producto inseguro y este va a ser el debate probatorio, demostrar que Gardasil es un producto inseguro para cientos o miles de niñas, no solamente en Colombia, sino en el mundo.
¿Cuál es el trámite de la demanda?
ML: Una acción de grupo en Colombia es una acción preferente, esto quiere decir que tiene que ser tramitada con rapidez y agilidad. Debido al número significativo de víctimas que conforman la demanda, me imagino que estarán dilatados los términos, pero en principio el juez mira si la admite o no, si ve los requisitos para su admisión y posteriormente entraremos en una etapa de notificación a Merck Sharp and Dhome, que es el demandado, y posteriormente a una etapa de conciliación y seguirán las etapas probatorias con todas las pruebas que en este momento tengo en mi poder.
¿Puedes hablarnos un poco cómo funciona este sistema en los Estados Unidos?
ML: En Estados Unidos existe un sistema de reporte de efectos adversos denominado VAERS, que recopila (supuestamente) todos los efectos producidos por todas las vacunas. Lo que llama la atención es que la vacuna Gardasil tiene un número desproporcionado de efectos adversos frente a las demás vacunas. Al contrario de los Estados Unidos, afortunadamente en Colombia no tenemos ningún impedimento judicial para demandar al fabricante de la vacuna, circunstancia que sí sucede en los EE. UU.,ya que gracias a una ley aprobada por el Congreso en 1986, los fabricantes de vacunas no pueden ser demandados en ese país por las víctimas, sino que estas pueden ser compensadas por el gobierno si se prueba que la vacuna les causó algún daño. Este es un tema de responsabilidad objetiva y no subjetiva, lo cual quiere decir que independientemente de si querían hacer o no un daño, deben resarcir los perjuicios.
¿Qué otros casos de demandas como esta se han visto en el mundo?
ML: El caso más conocido de demandas en el mundo contra el fabricante de la vacuna, es el del Japón, donde hay una demanda con un significativo número de víctimas, más de 60 niñas afectadas y que tiene un sustento probatorio bastante contundente, debido a que allí el mismo Ministerio de Salud es el que exige la creación de un grupo interdisciplinario para analizar los efectos adversos en cientos de niñas japonesas y llegan a unas conclusiones definitivas respecto a las enfermedades causadas, como por ejemplo la intolerancia ortostática, el síndrome del dolor tópico complejo, y enfermedades neurológicas que también estamos viendo en las niñas colombianas. Son los mismos diagnósticos, la misma sintomatología en dos países totalmente diferentes, Japón y Colombia.
¿Cuál ha sido la experiencia en Europa en casos como estos?
ML: Recientemente ha salido una sentencia proferida por la corte europea donde se hace una anotación respecto a la obligatoriedad de la parte demandante frente a la carga de la prueba. Es obvio que quien tiene la mejor condición para demostrar que actuó diligentemente es el fabricante, es la multinacional. Esto por obvias razones: económicas, científicas y de todo orden. Lo que se puede demostrar a partir de un juicio de esta naturaleza es que nosotros tenemos las víctimas, tenemos las historias clínicas y tenemos documentadas perfectamente las enfermedades. El juez tendrá que decidir si con eso considera que es suficiente material probatorio para establecer que la vacuna no es una vacuna segura.
¿Cómo podría tratar de contradecir Merck el testimonio de una víctima?
ML: Sería muy difícil mostrar que pueda haber aquí algo no relacionado directamente con la aplicación de la vacuna, ya que estas niñas en sus historias clínicas anteriores eran niñas sanas, y desarrollaron estas enfermedades idénticas a las que tienen las niñas en el Japón, Dinamarca, Estados Unidos, Canadá después de vacunarse. Indiscutiblemente, las menores colombinas han sido inoculadas con Gardasil desde 2013 y desde ese año se inician las sintomatologías y cuadros diagnósticos de enfermedades desmielinizantes, de enfermedades neurológicas y de enfermedades inmunológicas de la mayor gravedad que han dejado ya desafortunadamente seis menores muertas en Colombia y muchísimas en el mundo.
¿El hecho de que se hayan pagado indemnizaciones en los Estados Unidos por la vacuna Gardasil es un antecedente que se pueda usar en este tipo de casos?
ML: Definitivamente, el hecho de que se hayan pagado indemnizaciones de parte del fondo de compensaciones norteamericano demuestra que sí existe un daño y esto no sucede solamente con la vacuna Gardasil, históricamente, las multinacionales fabricantes de vacunas han tenido que enfrentar demandas de igual naturaleza. Por eso se creó una ley en Estados Unidos para impedir que las personas particulares pudieran demandar a los fabricantes de vacunas, ya que el número de reacciones adversas era alarmante. Tenemos por ejemplo el caso de la vacuna del polio, el denominado caso Cutter, es algo similar a lo que nos está ocurriendo, donde fueron unos 200 mil niños afectados con la enfermedad del polio y quedaron muchísimos con incapacidades para el resto de sus vidas y fueron indemnizados. Para proteger al fabricante, se crea en Estados Unidos este sistema que impide que se demande al fabricante de vacunas. Esperamos que esto no suceda en Colombia, porque no podemos seguir permitiendo que productos defectuosos como este sigan circulando en el mercado, dañando a consumidoras de la naturaleza y protección tan especial como son las niñas y adolescentes colombianas.
¿Son mayores los daños que los beneficios de la vacuna Gardasil?
ML: Sabemos que todos los productos y todos los medicamentos pueden tener efectos adversos, pero, ¿hasta qué punto debe soportar un consumidor un efecto adverso desproporcionado como el que está soportando cientos de niñas en Colombia y miles en el mundo? Es ahí donde se plantea la diferencia entre el daño generado proporcional y un tema que es muy debatido en el aspecto médico y judicial, que es el del bien general frente al particular y un daño que supera en proporción cualquier bien que esté obligada a asumir una persona en el colectivo. Para las niñas colombianas su expectativa legítima al aplicarse el Gardasil, fue el prevenir una enfermedad y nosotras como madres cuando aplicamos esa vacuna pretendimos que se protegiera a futuro a niñas de una enfermedad grave que quizás nunca hubieran adquirido porque no era 100% seguro que adquirieran un cáncer de la cérvix. Es por eso que se rompe la expectativa legítima del consumidor final que son las niñas, adolescentes y mujeres colombianas y se crea la responsabilidad.
¿Cuántas niñas hay afectadas en Colombia?
ML: Para esta fecha, agosto de 2017 hay alrededor de mil niñas afectadas a nivel nacional. Después de todas las denuncias presentadas en Colombia y a causa de todos los efectos adversos que han sido reportados, el porcentaje de aplicación de la vacuna Gardasil ha caído substancialmente en Colombia.
Con esta pregunta dimos por terminada la entrevista. Queda en manos de los jueces el que se haga justicia en este caso o el que una multinacional que ha sido penada con multas por billones de dólares por corrupción, se salga con la suya. El historial de Merck, el CDC (Centro de control de enfermedades de USA) y la OMS (Organización Mundial de la salud), es más como el historial de la mafia de las drogas que el de la lucha por la salud y bienestar del ser humano. El CDC, está comprobado, ocultó la relación entre las vacunas y el autismo, la OMS es la alcahueta que además se lucra de estas vacunas peligrosas y además todas estas organizaciones le dieron el visto bueno al adyuvante usado en las vacunas, el aluminio, el cual es una reconocida neurotoxina que atraviesa las barreras de protección del cerebro, se acumula en el mismo y comienza a producir diferentes tipos de enfermedades neurológicas que pueden terminar por matar a las pacientes que antes gozaban de perfecta salud.
Resulta muy diciente que los grandes medios de prensa de este país hayan ignorado esta demanda. No se necesita ser muy perspicaces para saber de qué lado están, ciertamente no del lado de la salud de todas estas niñas que languidecen sin ningún tipo de ayuda, ya que al gobierno le sale más barato negar la verdad que reparar los daños causados por su gran mentira inoculada. Esta es una lucha de David contra Goliath. Goliath tiene todo el poder del dinero y de los funcionarios y científicos comprados por treinta monedas de plata que juran y perjuran sobre la “benigna vacuna”. Las demandantes tienen sus cuerpos, sangrantes, debilitados, enfermos, desesperanzados, estigmatizados como prueba de que sí existió un antes y un después de la vacuna. La justicia tiene la palabra.
=======================================================================
2.) $ 160 million lawsuit against Merck for damages caused by the Gardasil vaccine in Colombia
======================================================================
Source:https://www.las2orillas.co/demanda-160-millones-dolares-merck-danos-causados-la-vacuna-gardasil-colombia/
"The vaccine," says the manufacturer, "serves to prevent uterine cancer, which it has never tried, since it would take decades to know"
By: Mario Lamo Jiménez
August 18, 2017
On August 4, a lawsuit against the multinational Merck Sharp and Dhome was filed in Colombian courts for $ 160 million dollars for damages caused by the Gardasil vaccine in this country. The lawyer, Mónica León del Rio, presented the lawsuit since in Colombia more than 700 girls have suffered the side effects of the Gardasil vaccine, which include, among others, syncope or fainting, autoimmune diseases, Guillain-Barret syndrome, dysautonomia , Sclerosis, encephalitis, neuropathies, lupus / Sjogren, ovarian failure, fibromyalgia, ASIA syndrome (autoimmune / inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants), and even death. ( See )
This demand is of particular importance as this vaccine is applied in many countries and tens of thousands of girls have been affected by its debilitating and crippling side effects and many have died because of it. The vaccine, says the manufacturer, serves to prevent uterine cancer, something that has never proven, since it would take decades to know and for the time being such prevention is just a matter of faith. The harsh reality is that the vaccine is unsafe and that the manufacturer practically falsified the evidence of the vaccine to hide its danger. The side effects of the vaccine are scientifically documented in independent (not paid by the manufacturer) medical studies, including those carried out by Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld and others, which appeared in the book Vaccines and Autoimmunity, published in 2015 by Wiley-Blackwell.
For this reason, I interviewed the lawyer Monica Leon del Rio, who responded to us about the lawsuit:
What is the lawsuit filed against Merck Sharp and Dhome?
ML: The group action filed against the multinational Merck Sharp and Dhome on August 4, is basically an action that collects a group, the group of girls, adolescents and women who have been harmed by the adverse effects of the vaccine Against the human papilloma virus, Gardasil. The peculiarity of a group action such as this one is the dimension in the number of victims that make it up, the uniqueness of symptomatology and diagnosis of each victim. This action will develop a very little issue in Colombia that is called 'responsibility for defective product'.
Why did you have to come to this instance?
ML: In Colombia, as in all parts of the world, all the instances have been exhausted to be able to report the adverse effects produced by Gardasil. Neither the health authorities nor the members of the medical groups in the countries where the adverse effects have been reported nor the multinational manufacturer of the product have responded and permanently have stigmatized the victims by stating that they have no organic damage component And that it is a case of "psychogeny".
It is particular to see how the issue of psychogenesis is an issue that has been addressed in all parts where there have been significant adverse effects. We have the case of Japan, the United Kingdom, Denmark, the United States, and always the common element that the health authorities, permeated by the multinational that manufactures the product, has been to establish a theme of childhood illness when clinical histories are being presented to the authorities Perfectly documented on the autoimmune and neurological diseases of the minors.
Due to this circumstance in Colombia, from the beginning of my activity of social and judicial denunciation, the adverse effects, the tables with the medical histories of the minors were instated and presented to the national government, and this was not adequately answered and treatments were not established For girls. Guardianship actions have been filed in order to guarantee the constitutional right to health and have not been complied with.
Can you give us an example of a guardianship that has not been fulfilled in this case?
ML: For example, the tutelage of Carmen de Bolivar was a tutelage that was won before the Colombian Council of State, which is the highest contentious body, this tutela has already two years after the sentence was issued and the girls of Carmen de Bolivar Are part of this tutelage have not been given any treatment, or have been issued diagnosis, this worsens the health situation of children and diseases have been making significant progress, causing the death of many of them.
Can you expand the issue of demand for "defective product" a bit?
ML: This is a demand that has a peculiar component in responsibility, called "product liability." This responsibility takes place when a product that comes to the market, to which the consumer has access, in this case the consumers are the Colombian girls and adolescents, it generates damage because it is an unsafe product and this is going to be the probative debate, to demonstrate that Gardasil is an insecure product for hundreds or thousands of girls, not only in Colombia, but in the world.
What is the process of the lawsuit?
ML: A group action in Colombia is a preferred action, this means that it has to be processed quickly and agility. Due to the significant number of victims that make up the lawsuit, I imagine that the terms will be extended, but in principle the judge will consider whether or not to admit it, if he sees the requirements for admission and then we will enter a stage of notification to Merck Sharp and Dhome, who is the defendant, and later to a stage of conciliation and will follow the probatory stages with all the evidence that I have at this moment in my possession.
Can you tell us a little about how this system works in the United States?
ML: In the United States there is an adverse effects reporting system called VAERS, which collects (supposedly) all effects produced by all vaccines. What is striking is that the Gardasil vaccine has a disproportionate number of adverse effects compared to the other vaccines. Unlike the United States, fortunately in Colombia we have no legal impediment to sue the vaccine manufacturer, a circumstance that does happen in the US. Because thanks to a law passed by Congress in 1986, vaccine manufacturers can not be sued in that country by the victims, but these can be compensated by the government if it is proven that the vaccine caused them harm . This is a matter of objective and non-subjective liability, which means that regardless of whether or not they wanted to do damage, they must compensate for damages.
What other cases of lawsuits like this have been seen in the world?
ML: The most well-known case in the world against the vaccine manufacturer is Japan, where there is a lawsuit with a significant number of victims, more than 60 girls affected and has a strong evidence base, due to That the same Ministry of Health is the one that requires the creation of an interdisciplinary group to analyze the adverse effects on hundreds of Japanese girls and arrive at definitive conclusions regarding the diseases caused, such as orthostatic intolerance, pain syndrome Complex, and neurological diseases that we are also seeing in Colombian girls. They are the same diagnoses, the same symptomatology in two totally different countries, Japan and Colombia.
What has been the experience in Europe in cases like these?
ML: Recently a sentence has been issued by the European Court where an annotation is made regarding the obligation of the plaintiff against the burden of proof. It is obvious that the one who has the best condition to prove that he acted diligently is the manufacturer, is the multinational. This for obvious reasons: economic, scientific and of any order. What can be demonstrated from a judgment of this nature is that we have the victims, we have the medical records and we have perfectly documented diseases. The judge will have to decide whether it considers that sufficient evidence is sufficient to establish that the vaccine is not a safe vaccine.
How could Merck try to contradict a victim's testimony?
ML: It would be very difficult to show that there may be something directly unrelated to vaccine application here, since these girls in their previous medical records were healthy girls, and developed these diseases identical to those in Japan, Denmark , United States, Canada after being vaccinated. Undoubtedly, Colombian minors have been inoculated with Gardasil since 2013 and since that year began the symptoms and diagnosis of demyelinating diseases, neurological diseases and immunological diseases of the greatest severity that have unfortunately left six children dead in Colombia and many in the world.
Does the fact that compensation has been paid in the United States for the Gardasil vaccine is a history that can be used in this type of case?
ML: Definitely, the fact that compensation has been paid by the American compensation fund demonstrates that there is damage and not only the vaccine Gardasil, historically, multinational vaccine manufacturers have had to face similar lawsuits . That is why a law was created in the United States to prevent individuals from suing vaccine manufacturers, as the number of adverse reactions was alarming. We have, for example, the case of the polio vaccine, the so-called Cutter case, something similar to what is happening to us, where there were about 200 thousand children affected by polio disease, and there were a lot of people with disabilities for the rest of their lives and Were compensated. To protect the manufacturer, this system is created in the United States, which prevents the vaccine maker from being sued. We hope this does not happen in Colombia, because we can not continue to allow defective products like this to continue to circulate in the market, damaging consumers of nature and protection as special as Colombian girls and adolescents.
Are damages greater than the benefits of the Gardasil vaccine?
ML: We know that all products and all medicines can have adverse effects, but to what extent should a consumer have a disproportionate adverse effect such as the one being endured by hundreds of girls in Colombia and thousands in the world? This is where the difference between the proportional harm generated and an issue that is much debated in the medical and judicial aspects, which is the general good versus the individual, and damage that exceeds in proportion any property that is obliged to assume a Person in the collective. For Colombian girls, her legitimate expectation when applying Gardasil was to prevent a disease and we as mothers when we applied that vaccine, we wanted to protect girls in the future from a serious illness that they might never have acquired because it was not 100% sure that they would acquire A cancer of the cervix. That is why it breaks the legitimate expectations of the final consumer that are the girls, adolescents and Colombian women and creates the responsibility.
How many girls are affected in Colombia?
ML: By this date, August 2017 there are around a thousand girls affected nationally. After all the complaints filed in Colombia and because of all the adverse effects that have been reported, the percentage of application of Gardasil vaccine has dropped substantially in Colombia.
With this question we finished the interview. It remains in the hands of the judges that justice is done in this case or that a multinational that has been punished with fines for billions of dollars for corruption, get away with it. The history of Merck, the CDC (Center for Disease Control in the USA) and WHO (World Health Organization), is more like the history of the drug mafia than that of the struggle for health and well being human. The CDC, is proven, hid the relationship between vaccines and autism, WHO is the bait who also profits from these dangerous vaccines and also all these organizations gave the go-ahead to the adjuvant used in vaccines, aluminum, Which is a recognized neurotoxin that crosses the barriers of protection of the brain, accumulates in the same and begins to produce different types of neurological diseases that can end up killing the patients who previously enjoyed perfect health.
It is very telling that the mainstream media in this country have ignored this demand. It is not necessary to be very perceptive to know which side they are, certainly not on the health side of all these girls who languish without any help, since the government is cheaper to deny the truth than to repair the damage caused by its Big inoculated lie. This is David's fight against Goliath. Goliath has all the power of money and of the officials and scientists bought by thirty silver coins that swear and perjuran on the "benign vaccine". The plaintiffs have their bodies, bleeding, debilitated, sick, hopeless, stigmatized as proof that there was a before and after the vaccine. Justice has the floor.
===================================================================
3.) U.S. court pays $6 million to Gardasil victims
===================================================================
Source:http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/dec/31/us-court-pays-6-million-gardasil-victims/
By Peter Lind - - Wednesday, December 31, 2014
WASHINGTON, April 10, 2013 - Gardasil, the vaccine for HPV (human papillomavirus), may not be as safe as backers claim.
Judicial Watch announced it has received documents from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) revealing that its National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) has awarded $5,877,710 dollars to 49 victims in claims made against the highly controversial HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccines. To date 200 claims have been filed with VICP, with barely half adjudicated.
“This new information from the government shows that the serious safety concerns about the use of Gardasil have been well-founded. Public health officials should stop pushing Gardasil on children.” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
The CDC recommends the Gardasil vaccine, made by Merck Pharmaceuticals, for all females between 9 and 26 years to protect against HPV. Furthermore, the CDC says Gardasil is licensed, safe, and effective for males ages 9 through 26 years.
The facts appear to contradict the FDA’s safety statements. The adverse reaction reports detail 26 new deaths reported between September 1, 2010 and September 15, 2011 as well as incidents of seizures, paralysis, blindness, pancreatitis, speech problems, short term memory loss and Guillain-Barré Syndrome. The documents come from the FDA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) which is used by the FDA to monitor the safety of vaccines.
That’s 26 reported deaths of young, previously healthy, girls after Gardasil vaccination in just one year.
In response to the concern about death reports among those who received Gardasil, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) insists “there was no unusual pattern or clustering to the deaths that would suggest that they were caused by the vaccine.”
While it is not clear exactly what is causing so many adverse reactions, Gardasil does contain genetically engineered virus-like protein particles as well as aluminum, which can affect immune function.
Further, according to the vaccine manufacturer product information insert, “Gardasil … not been evaluated for carcinogenicity or impairment of fertility.” (2007 [227] p1986 )
In fact, Merck studied the Gardasil vaccine in fewer than 1,200 girls under 16 prior to it being released to the market under a fast-tracked road to licensure. To date, most of the serious side effects, including deaths, that occurred during the pre-licensure clinical trials and post marketing surveillance have been written off as a “coincidence” by Merck researchers and government health officials.
Neurologist Dr. Ian Sutton reported negative neurological side effects from Gardasil. He reported five cases of multiple sclerosis-like symptoms emerging shortly after women received the Gardasil vaccine, noting:
“We report five patients who presented with multifocal or atypical demyelinating syndromes within 21 days of immunization with the quadrivalent human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine, Gardasil. Although the target population for vaccination, young females, has an inherently high risk for MS, the temporal association with demyelinating events in these cases may be explained by the potent immuno-stimulatory properties of HPV virus-like particles which comprise the vaccine.”
From its inception, the use of HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccines for sexually transmitted diseases has been hotly disputed. According to the Annals of Medicine: “At present there are no significant data showing that either Gardasil or Cervarix (GlaxoSmithKline) can prevent any type of cervical cancer since the testing period employed was too short to evaluate long-term benefits of HPV vaccination.”
There are more than 100 types of human papillomaviruses (HPVs). Of them, about 40 types of HPV are sexually transmitted and 15 of these types are most associated with cervical cancers and genital warts in women and men.
HPV vaccines have been illegally administered to millions without informed consent, as the risks rarely disclosed.
Not only are there questions about the safety of the vaccine, there are questions about the need for the vaccine. Over 90 percent of women infected with HPV clear the infection naturally within two years, at which point cervical cells go back to normal.
Meanwhile, Merck is benefitting tremendously from vaccine sales. The vaccine is expected to reach $1 billion in sales next year, and could reach more than $4 billion in sales in five years, according to Wall Street analysts.
Dr. Peter Lind practices metabolic and neurologic chiropractic in his wellness clinic in Salem, Oregon. USA. He is the author of 3 books on health, one novel, and hundreds of wellness articles. His clinical specialty is in physical, nutritional, and emotional stress. He is virtual staff doctor for http://www.thealternativedaily.com/fructosetoxic.html
=======================================================================
4.) Two Cases of Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis Following Vaccination Against Human Papilloma Virus.
=======================================================================
Intern Med. 2016;55(21):3181-3184. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
Sekiguchi K1, Yasui N, Kowa H, Kanda F, Toda T.
Author information
1
Division of Neurology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Abstract
We herein present two cases of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) following vaccination against human papilloma virus (HPV). Case 1 experienced diplopia and developed an unstable gait 14 days after a second vaccination of Cervarix. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed an isolated small, demyelinating lesion in the pontine tegmentum. Case 2 experienced a fever and limb dysesthesia 16 days after a second vaccination of Gardasil. Brain MRI revealed hyperintense lesion in the pons with slight edema on a T2-weighted image. Both cases resolved completely. It is important to accumulate further data on confirmed cases of ADEM temporally associated with HPV vaccination.
=======================================================================
3.) Sanofi sued in France over Gardasil vaccine
=======================================================================
November 24, 2013 / 1:42 PM / 4 years ago
Source: Reuters Staff
BORDEAUX (Reuters) - A French teenager has filed a lawsuit against French pharmaceutical company Sanofi Pasteur (SASY.PA) and France’s health regulators, her lawyer said on Sunday, over side-effects they say were caused by the Gardasil anti-cervical cancer vaccine.
The lawsuit filed on Friday in Bobigny outside Paris says Sanofi and health regulators violated “obvious safety obligations and breached the principles of precaution and prevention.”
The plaintiff’s lawyer, Jean-Christophe Coubris, who is based in Bordeaux, said his now 18-year-old client was 15 when she received two injections of Gardasil, which is made by Merck (MRK.N) and sold in Europe by Sanofi.
Within months she was hospitalized for multiple sclerosis, he said.
“She temporarily lost her sight and the use of her legs,” Coubris said in a statement.
Coubris also represents victims of the Mediator scandal, in which officials blame the anti-diabetes drug made by Servier Laboratories for at least 500 deaths in France.
Sanofi said in a statement that studies in France and around the world have found no increased risk of multiple sclerosis linked to Gardasil.
"As the scientific literature underlines, the fact that a illness appears after a vaccine is administered does not mean that the vaccine caused this illness," it said.
Sanofi said studies showed that cases of multiple sclerosis in young people occur at the same rate whether or not they have been vaccinated with Gardasil.
=======================================================================
5.) HPV Vaccine: Death in Spain / April 16, 2017
======================================================================
JUSTICE RECOGNIZES WHAT HEALTH AUTHORITIES DO NOT WANT TO RECOGNIZE
Source:http://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccine-death-spain/
By Alicia Capilla, Guest Author
The High Court of Justice of Asturias- Spain (TSJA) has condemned the Asturian Health System for the death of Andrea, a young Spanish girl who died in September 2012 after getting the second shot of the HPV vaccine. The Court recognizes the bad practice of the hospitals of Jove and Cabueñes, since they did not diagnose the pathology before the second shot of the vaccine was supplied which caused the death of the young woman.
AAVP President, Alicia Capilla
Andrea was a young woman with a medical history of mild episodes of bronchial asthma. When she got the first shot of the HPV vaccine on July 23, 2012, she became with headache and breathing difficulty. Although, she suffered from severe asthmatic exarcebation, she got the second shot on August 23, 2012, with a sudden worsening. As a result of this, she suffered severe dyspnea and seizures only 12 hours after receiving the vaccine. She was moved to the Maternal and Child Hospital of the HUCA where she remained in the Pediatric Intensity Care Unit until she died on 8 September.
The judicial sentence acknowledges that there is a casual link with the vaccine, between the second shot and her death, despite the fact that at the trial, the Administration took advantage of the fact that the vaccine is fully endorsed by drug regulatory agencies throughout the country and that the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) –with regard to this case reporting- determined that there was insufficient evidence to suggest a causal association with the vaccine. The paradox of this study and its lack of scientific rigor is clear as the Committee agreed to maintain an investigation on the signal.
The Association of Affected People in Spain by the Human Papillomus Virus Vaccine (AAVP) has been demanding since 2009 many other cases of affected victims collected in our database. We have repeatedly called on the Health Authorities of Spain to recognize adverse reactions, documented many of them in the HPV vaccines databases, in the European Medicines Agency (EMA) databases, in the Spain one and in the HPV scientific literature. Andrea´s case in not unique. There are at least five more reports of deaths collected in the database of the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Sanitary Products, for not mentioning all the reports collected in the EMA database. In spite of all this, the Health Authorities and the Pharmaceutical Company continues to deny recognition of any adverse reaction. The most regrettable of all is that they blame the young women in their adverse state of health, stigmatizing them and referring all this to psychological problems, a matter which of course lacks any scientific basis, since no epidemiological studies which prove the causality of the adverse reactions experienced by many young women and the vaccine, have been carried out in Spain.
We regret once again the poor performance of the Health Authorities that are not carrying out an adequate evaluation and monitoring system, as well as looking elsewhere instead of looking after the health of girls and young women who have had the misfortune to suffer adverse reactions as a result of a Public Health policy that seems to defend more economic and political interests than health ones. We must not forget that this immunization is applied to healthy young people and it is also in its implementation phase, so that Pharmacovigilance systems should act with due diligence and responsibility.
We are pleased that for the first time in Spain, in court, the causal link of an adverse reaction with the HPV vaccine is recognized. We show our support to Andrea´s family, because despite their misfortune they have been supported by a judicial sentence that finally protects them. It was time for justice!
Alicia Capilla
President AAVP
Source:www.aavp.es
asociacion.aavp@gmail.com
=======================================================================
6.) New Death Post-Gardasil Updated VAERS Figures & Report that HPV Vaccines Adverse Reactions are 50% Higher than other Age- Related Recommended Vaccines
=======================================================================
Source:http://sanevax.org/new-death-post-gardasil-updated-vaers-figures-report-that-hpv-vaccines-adverse-reactions-are-50-higher-than-other-age-related-recommended-vaccines/
Mother of Injured Gardasil Girl Demands
Gardasil’s ‘New Medical Conditions’ Be Legitimized as
Post-Gardasil Syndrome (PGS) & Post-Cervarix Syndrome (PCS)
By Leslie Carol Botha, Vice President of Public Relations
November 29, 2011
One would think the world is facing a cervical cancer epidemic with the amount of money being exchanged and laws changed to make sure the potentially dangerous HPV vaccines and the rDNA contaminated Gardasil become front and center in global consumer markets. One must also be starting to question the hidden agendas behind this world-wide vaccination program.
Kind of slick and sly for the global media to announce on the U.S. Thanksgiving Day that Gardasil will make its debut in the UK by September 2012. Merck’s marketing department shows no thoughtfulness or integrity towards the parents of dead and injured Gardasil children to break this news on a traditional holiday with damaged families trying to count their blessings while battling the feelings of anger, frustration, betrayal, and powerlessness they now live with daily.
Updated VAERS Data
According to SANE Vax Inc. VAERS Researcher, Janny Stokvis, there has been another increase in adverse injuries and deaths from the HPV vaccines since the last report issued in August. Data below for HPV 2 Cervarix & HPV 4 Gardasil adverse reactions (estimated 1 to 10% of the vaccine injured population reporting) as of October 11 with significant category increases compared to August 11, 2011:
HPV Vaccines
Year 2.011 October August
===============================
Disabled 780 763
Deaths 104 103
Did Not Recover 4,898 4,777
Abnormal Pap Smear 467 430
Cervical Dysplasia 177 157
Cervical Cancer 41 41
Life Threatening 457 444
Emergency Room Visit 9,312 9,115
Hospitalized 2,335 2,307
Extended Hospital stay 208 201
Serious 3,155 3,111
Total Adverse Events 23,982 23,388
ONE MORE GIRL
VAERS ID 437735 shows that on July 6, 2011, an 18 year old girl from Massachusetts died 84 days after receiving two shots of Gardasil:
Relapse of ITP: 18 year-old female with immune thrombocytopenic purpura, diagnosed in 1995 and in remission from 2004 to 2011 following treatment with Rituximab. Relapse in early April, 2011, followed administration of Gardasil vaccine on 10-26-10 and 1-7-11. Relapse of ITP led eventually to death from intracranial hemorrhage on 07/06/2011.
According to MedScape Reference: “Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is a clinical syndrome in which a decreased number of circulating platelets (thrombocytopenia) manifests as a bleeding tendency, easy bruising (purpura), or extravasation of blood from capillaries into skin and mucous membranes (petechiae).” 1.
VAERS reports that the parents noted the petechiae event sometime in April, however, when tested, the girl’s lab diagnostics showed that the blood work was within normal range:
CBC on 04/26/2011 included platelet count 5000; WBC 5.4 with normal differential, Hgb 12.8, Hct 37.2, MCV 87.9; normal RBC morphology. 2.
SANE Vax Inc. is demanding an investigation into the death of an already immune-comprised teen girl who received Gardasil when the safety and efficacy data is based on clinical trials on healthy girls.3. What was the mechanism of action that caused her death from an intracranial hemorrhage?
HPV Vaccines – More than Double Vaccine Reactions than all other Recommended Vaccinations
In August, Steven Rubin posted disturbing data in VAERS showing that for the ‘CDC-recommended vaccines for 7-18-year-olds, HPV vaccine injuries were greater than others in that group.’ Rubin compiled the data below for the two age groups 0 – 6 and 7 – 18 showing the approximate numbers of reported adverse injuries from only the recommended vaccines for that age group.
Rubin notes “…..children age 0-6 years are reporting the most VAERS events following a DTP vaccination. Children ages 7-18 years are significantly affected by the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. Note that HPV is already associated with over 100 deaths, and is not limited to girls (there are three reports of boys who have died following an HPV vaccination). This is not the most widely given vaccination for 7-18 year olds, but it appears frequently in VAERS and is associated with serious adverse effects.4.
Gardasil Victim’s Mother Demands Naming Gardasil ‘New Medical Conditions’
Deanna Martinez, mother of Shelby, age 17; who Martinez calls a “Gardasil Victim because she suffers from adverse reactions to this killer drug every day,” had her first and only Gardasil shot on March 31, 2011 and has been ill ever since. Martinez contacted Norma Erickson, President of SANE Vax Inc. via email to express her frustration and concerns that the Gardasil children are afflicted with a ‘nameless condition,’ instead of an official primary diagnosis. She wrote:
“Of course, there is the familiar and vague ‘adverse reaction to the Gardasil vaccine’ or worse ‘possible adverse reaction to the Gardasil vaccine’ or ‘condition of unknown etiology’ which no one understands and few believe in. There are other diagnoses for conditions that result from the adverse reaction to Gardasil — Lupus, neuropathy, migraines, chronic fatigue…of unknown etiology-you know that the endless list goes on and on. However, these are all SECONDARY conditions and diagnoses!
“In order for our children’s illnesses to be legitimized and ultimately a cure or treatment to be found we must have an official primary diagnosis. And that primary diagnosis must officially and directly be tied to the Gardasil injection. It MUST have a name! Furthermore, a treatment protocol must be designed. We must no longer settle for a nameless condition with no standard of treatment.
“I am sure that at different times we all call our kids’ illness different names. I believe that it makes their illness less believable, even and sometimes especially, for them. It makes their voices smaller. It makes their lives harder. It sends the wrong message to the world. It does not further their cause.
“Just think, if your child had Diabetes would you tell people that they had an adverse reaction to sugar? If your child had asthma would you just say they had an adverse reaction to allergens in the air? We need to name our kids’ illness.
“Because we have already had to do so much of the research and treatment and lifesaving for our children on our own, let’s not wait for the medical community, the drug company or the government to come up with an official diagnosis name. Let’s determine a name for their condition on our own! Let’s all call it one condition. Let’s use it in our daily lives with our child, our doctors, our family and friends, in our correspondence, on our websites, in our emails, everywhere. Let’s give our kids some power back by legitimizing their illness. Let’s get the word out that our kids really are sick and their sickness has a name-it’s legitimate!”
SANE Vax Inc. agrees with Martinez’s astute observations – and we support her demand that adverse reactions from the HPV vaccines not only be named but used universally by medical consumers, educators, researchers, medical professionals, government health agencies, politicians and the media.
SANE Vax Inc. is announcing from this time forward adverse reactions from Merck’s HPV 4 Gardasil now be known as Post-Gardasil Syndrome (PGS) and GlaxoSmithKline’s HPV 2 Cervarix be known as Post-Cervarix Syndrome (PCS).
PGS & PCS will be applied to the reported adverse conditions from the HPV vaccines whose symptoms include but are not limited to the following conditions:
Post Gardasil Syndrome & Post-Cervarix Syndrome Adverse Reactions SEE: graphic
Parents and advocates around the world are uniting to stop this global vaccine program threatening the lives and health of their adolescent children. If you know of someone who already suffers from PGS or PCS, please have them contact SANE Vax Inc. at info@sanevax.org. Governments of the world need to know medical consumers are now demanding safe, affordable, effective and necessary vaccinations. Gardasil does not meet any of the above requirements. Governments of the world must also be held accountable for damaging the health and well being of the children of their constituents.
2.) $ 160 million lawsuit against Merck for damages caused by the Gardasil vaccine in Colombia
3.) U.S. court pays $6 million to Gardasil victims
4.) Two Cases of Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis Following Vaccination Against Human Papilloma Virus.
3.) Sanofi sued in France over Gardasil vaccine
5.) HPV Vaccine: Death in Spain / April 16, 2017
6.) New Death Post-Gardasil Updated VAERS Figures & Report that HPV Vaccines Adverse Reactions are 50% Higher than other Age- Related Recommended Vaccines
==================================================================
=======================================================================
1.) Demanda por $160 millones de dólares contra Merck por daños causados por la vacuna Gardasil en Colombia
=======================================================================
Source:https://www.las2orillas.co/demanda-160-millones-dolares-merck-danos-causados-la-vacuna-gardasil-colombia/
“La vacuna, dice el fabricante, sirve para prevenir el cáncer uterino, cosa que jamás ha probado, ya que se necesitarían décadas para saberlo”
Por: Mario Lamo Jiménez | Agosto 18, 2017
El pasado 4 de agosto se presentó ante la justicia colombiana una demanda contra la multinacional Merck Sharp and Dhome por $160 millones de dólares por los daños causados por la vacuna Gardasil en este país. La abogada, Mónica León del Río, presentó la demanda ya que en Colombia más de 700 niñas han sufrido los efectos colaterales de la vacuna Gardasil, los cuales incluyen, entre otros, síncope o desmayo, enfermedades autoinmunes, síndrome de Guillain-Barret, disautonomía, esclerosis, encefalitis, neuropatías, lupus/Sjogren, insuficiencia ovárica, fibromialgia, síndrome ASIA (síndrome autoinmune/inflamatorio inducido por adyuvantes), e incluso la muerte. (Ver)
Esta demanda es de especial importancia ya que esta vacuna se aplica en muchos países y decenas de miles de niñas han sido afectadas por sus debilitantes e incapacitantes efectos colaterales y muchas han muerto a causa de la misma. La vacuna, dice el fabricante, sirve para prevenir el cáncer uterino, cosa que jamás ha probado, ya que se necesitarían décadas para saberlo y por el momento tal prevención es solo un asunto de fe. La cruda realidad es que la vacuna es insegura y que el fabricante prácticamente falsificó las pruebas de la misma para ocultar su peligrosidad. Los efectos colaterales de la vacuna se encuentran científicamente documentados en estudios médicos independientes (no pagados por el fabricante), entre ellos los llevados a cabo por el Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld y otros, que aparecieran en el libro Vaccines and Autoimmunity, publicado en 2015 por Wiley-Blackwell.
Por este motivo, entrevisté a la abogada Mónica León del Río, quien nos respondió así acerca de la demanda:
¿En qué consiste la demanda presentada contra Merck Sharp and Dhome?
ML: La acción de grupo presentada contra la multinacional Merck Sharp and Dhome el pasado 4 de agosto, es básicamente una acción que recoge a un colectivo, el colectivo de niñas, adolescentes y mujeres que se han visto perjudicadas por los efectos adversos de la vacuna contra el virus del papiloma humano, Gardasil. La peculiaridad de una acción de grupo como la que nos ocupa, es la dimensión en el número de víctimas que la conforman, la unicidad de sintomatología y diagnóstico de cada víctima. Esta acción va a desarrollar un tema muy poco tocado en Colombia que se denomina ´responsabilidad por producto defectuoso´.
¿Por qué se tuvo que llegar a esta instancia?
ML: En Colombia, al igual que en todas partes del mundo, se han agotado todas las instancias para poder denunciar los efectos adversos producidos por Gardasil. Ni las autoridades sanitarias ni los miembros de los grupos de medicina de los países en donde se han denunciado los efectos adversos ni la multinacional fabricante del producto han dado respuesta y de manera permanente han estigmatizado a las víctimas manifestando que no tienen ningún componente de daño orgánico y que se trata de un caso de “psicogenia”.
Es particular ver cómo el tema de la psicogenia es un tema que ha sido tratado en todas las partes donde ha habido efectos adversos significativos. Tenemos el caso del Japón, Reino Unido, Dinamarca, Estados Unidos, y siempre el elemento común que las autoridades de salud, permeadas por la multinacional que fabrica el producto, ha sido establecer un tema de piscogenia cuando se están presentando ante las autoridades historias clínicas perfectamente documentadas sobre las enfermedades autoinmunes y neurológicas de las menores.
Por esa circunstancia en Colombia, desde el inicio de mi actividad de denuncia social y judicial, e instaurado y presentado al gobierno nacional los efectos adversos, las tablas con las historias clínicas de las menores y esto no fue respondido de manera adecuada ni se establecieron tratamientos para las niñas. Se ha presentado acciones de tutela con el fin de garantizar el derecho constitucional a la salud y tampoco se les han dado cumplimiento.
¿Puedes darnos un ejemplo de una tutela que no se haya cumplido en este caso?
ML: Por ejemplo, la tutela del Carmen de Bolívar fue una tutela que se ganó ante el Consejo de Estado Colombiano, que es el máximo organismo contencioso, esta tutela tiene ya dos años de haber salido la sentencia y a las niñas del Carmen de Bolívar que forman parte de esta tutela no se les ha dado tratamiento ninguno, ni se les ha emitido diagnóstico, esto empeora la situación de salud de las menores y las enfermedades han venido avanzando significativamente, causando la muerte de muchas de ellas.
¿Puedes ampliar un poco el tema de la demanda por “producto defectuoso”?
ML: Esta es una demanda que tiene un componente peculiar en materia de responsabilidad, denominado “responsabilidad por producto defectuoso”. Dicha responsabilidad tiene lugar cuando un producto que sale al mercado, al que tiene acceso el consumidor, en este caso las consumidoras son las niñas y adolescentes colombianas, genera un daño por ser un producto inseguro y este va a ser el debate probatorio, demostrar que Gardasil es un producto inseguro para cientos o miles de niñas, no solamente en Colombia, sino en el mundo.
¿Cuál es el trámite de la demanda?
ML: Una acción de grupo en Colombia es una acción preferente, esto quiere decir que tiene que ser tramitada con rapidez y agilidad. Debido al número significativo de víctimas que conforman la demanda, me imagino que estarán dilatados los términos, pero en principio el juez mira si la admite o no, si ve los requisitos para su admisión y posteriormente entraremos en una etapa de notificación a Merck Sharp and Dhome, que es el demandado, y posteriormente a una etapa de conciliación y seguirán las etapas probatorias con todas las pruebas que en este momento tengo en mi poder.
¿Puedes hablarnos un poco cómo funciona este sistema en los Estados Unidos?
ML: En Estados Unidos existe un sistema de reporte de efectos adversos denominado VAERS, que recopila (supuestamente) todos los efectos producidos por todas las vacunas. Lo que llama la atención es que la vacuna Gardasil tiene un número desproporcionado de efectos adversos frente a las demás vacunas. Al contrario de los Estados Unidos, afortunadamente en Colombia no tenemos ningún impedimento judicial para demandar al fabricante de la vacuna, circunstancia que sí sucede en los EE. UU.,ya que gracias a una ley aprobada por el Congreso en 1986, los fabricantes de vacunas no pueden ser demandados en ese país por las víctimas, sino que estas pueden ser compensadas por el gobierno si se prueba que la vacuna les causó algún daño. Este es un tema de responsabilidad objetiva y no subjetiva, lo cual quiere decir que independientemente de si querían hacer o no un daño, deben resarcir los perjuicios.
¿Qué otros casos de demandas como esta se han visto en el mundo?
ML: El caso más conocido de demandas en el mundo contra el fabricante de la vacuna, es el del Japón, donde hay una demanda con un significativo número de víctimas, más de 60 niñas afectadas y que tiene un sustento probatorio bastante contundente, debido a que allí el mismo Ministerio de Salud es el que exige la creación de un grupo interdisciplinario para analizar los efectos adversos en cientos de niñas japonesas y llegan a unas conclusiones definitivas respecto a las enfermedades causadas, como por ejemplo la intolerancia ortostática, el síndrome del dolor tópico complejo, y enfermedades neurológicas que también estamos viendo en las niñas colombianas. Son los mismos diagnósticos, la misma sintomatología en dos países totalmente diferentes, Japón y Colombia.
¿Cuál ha sido la experiencia en Europa en casos como estos?
ML: Recientemente ha salido una sentencia proferida por la corte europea donde se hace una anotación respecto a la obligatoriedad de la parte demandante frente a la carga de la prueba. Es obvio que quien tiene la mejor condición para demostrar que actuó diligentemente es el fabricante, es la multinacional. Esto por obvias razones: económicas, científicas y de todo orden. Lo que se puede demostrar a partir de un juicio de esta naturaleza es que nosotros tenemos las víctimas, tenemos las historias clínicas y tenemos documentadas perfectamente las enfermedades. El juez tendrá que decidir si con eso considera que es suficiente material probatorio para establecer que la vacuna no es una vacuna segura.
¿Cómo podría tratar de contradecir Merck el testimonio de una víctima?
ML: Sería muy difícil mostrar que pueda haber aquí algo no relacionado directamente con la aplicación de la vacuna, ya que estas niñas en sus historias clínicas anteriores eran niñas sanas, y desarrollaron estas enfermedades idénticas a las que tienen las niñas en el Japón, Dinamarca, Estados Unidos, Canadá después de vacunarse. Indiscutiblemente, las menores colombinas han sido inoculadas con Gardasil desde 2013 y desde ese año se inician las sintomatologías y cuadros diagnósticos de enfermedades desmielinizantes, de enfermedades neurológicas y de enfermedades inmunológicas de la mayor gravedad que han dejado ya desafortunadamente seis menores muertas en Colombia y muchísimas en el mundo.
¿El hecho de que se hayan pagado indemnizaciones en los Estados Unidos por la vacuna Gardasil es un antecedente que se pueda usar en este tipo de casos?
ML: Definitivamente, el hecho de que se hayan pagado indemnizaciones de parte del fondo de compensaciones norteamericano demuestra que sí existe un daño y esto no sucede solamente con la vacuna Gardasil, históricamente, las multinacionales fabricantes de vacunas han tenido que enfrentar demandas de igual naturaleza. Por eso se creó una ley en Estados Unidos para impedir que las personas particulares pudieran demandar a los fabricantes de vacunas, ya que el número de reacciones adversas era alarmante. Tenemos por ejemplo el caso de la vacuna del polio, el denominado caso Cutter, es algo similar a lo que nos está ocurriendo, donde fueron unos 200 mil niños afectados con la enfermedad del polio y quedaron muchísimos con incapacidades para el resto de sus vidas y fueron indemnizados. Para proteger al fabricante, se crea en Estados Unidos este sistema que impide que se demande al fabricante de vacunas. Esperamos que esto no suceda en Colombia, porque no podemos seguir permitiendo que productos defectuosos como este sigan circulando en el mercado, dañando a consumidoras de la naturaleza y protección tan especial como son las niñas y adolescentes colombianas.
¿Son mayores los daños que los beneficios de la vacuna Gardasil?
ML: Sabemos que todos los productos y todos los medicamentos pueden tener efectos adversos, pero, ¿hasta qué punto debe soportar un consumidor un efecto adverso desproporcionado como el que está soportando cientos de niñas en Colombia y miles en el mundo? Es ahí donde se plantea la diferencia entre el daño generado proporcional y un tema que es muy debatido en el aspecto médico y judicial, que es el del bien general frente al particular y un daño que supera en proporción cualquier bien que esté obligada a asumir una persona en el colectivo. Para las niñas colombianas su expectativa legítima al aplicarse el Gardasil, fue el prevenir una enfermedad y nosotras como madres cuando aplicamos esa vacuna pretendimos que se protegiera a futuro a niñas de una enfermedad grave que quizás nunca hubieran adquirido porque no era 100% seguro que adquirieran un cáncer de la cérvix. Es por eso que se rompe la expectativa legítima del consumidor final que son las niñas, adolescentes y mujeres colombianas y se crea la responsabilidad.
¿Cuántas niñas hay afectadas en Colombia?
ML: Para esta fecha, agosto de 2017 hay alrededor de mil niñas afectadas a nivel nacional. Después de todas las denuncias presentadas en Colombia y a causa de todos los efectos adversos que han sido reportados, el porcentaje de aplicación de la vacuna Gardasil ha caído substancialmente en Colombia.
Con esta pregunta dimos por terminada la entrevista. Queda en manos de los jueces el que se haga justicia en este caso o el que una multinacional que ha sido penada con multas por billones de dólares por corrupción, se salga con la suya. El historial de Merck, el CDC (Centro de control de enfermedades de USA) y la OMS (Organización Mundial de la salud), es más como el historial de la mafia de las drogas que el de la lucha por la salud y bienestar del ser humano. El CDC, está comprobado, ocultó la relación entre las vacunas y el autismo, la OMS es la alcahueta que además se lucra de estas vacunas peligrosas y además todas estas organizaciones le dieron el visto bueno al adyuvante usado en las vacunas, el aluminio, el cual es una reconocida neurotoxina que atraviesa las barreras de protección del cerebro, se acumula en el mismo y comienza a producir diferentes tipos de enfermedades neurológicas que pueden terminar por matar a las pacientes que antes gozaban de perfecta salud.
Resulta muy diciente que los grandes medios de prensa de este país hayan ignorado esta demanda. No se necesita ser muy perspicaces para saber de qué lado están, ciertamente no del lado de la salud de todas estas niñas que languidecen sin ningún tipo de ayuda, ya que al gobierno le sale más barato negar la verdad que reparar los daños causados por su gran mentira inoculada. Esta es una lucha de David contra Goliath. Goliath tiene todo el poder del dinero y de los funcionarios y científicos comprados por treinta monedas de plata que juran y perjuran sobre la “benigna vacuna”. Las demandantes tienen sus cuerpos, sangrantes, debilitados, enfermos, desesperanzados, estigmatizados como prueba de que sí existió un antes y un después de la vacuna. La justicia tiene la palabra.
=======================================================================
2.) $ 160 million lawsuit against Merck for damages caused by the Gardasil vaccine in Colombia
======================================================================
Source:https://www.las2orillas.co/demanda-160-millones-dolares-merck-danos-causados-la-vacuna-gardasil-colombia/
"The vaccine," says the manufacturer, "serves to prevent uterine cancer, which it has never tried, since it would take decades to know"
By: Mario Lamo Jiménez
August 18, 2017
On August 4, a lawsuit against the multinational Merck Sharp and Dhome was filed in Colombian courts for $ 160 million dollars for damages caused by the Gardasil vaccine in this country. The lawyer, Mónica León del Rio, presented the lawsuit since in Colombia more than 700 girls have suffered the side effects of the Gardasil vaccine, which include, among others, syncope or fainting, autoimmune diseases, Guillain-Barret syndrome, dysautonomia , Sclerosis, encephalitis, neuropathies, lupus / Sjogren, ovarian failure, fibromyalgia, ASIA syndrome (autoimmune / inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants), and even death. ( See )
This demand is of particular importance as this vaccine is applied in many countries and tens of thousands of girls have been affected by its debilitating and crippling side effects and many have died because of it. The vaccine, says the manufacturer, serves to prevent uterine cancer, something that has never proven, since it would take decades to know and for the time being such prevention is just a matter of faith. The harsh reality is that the vaccine is unsafe and that the manufacturer practically falsified the evidence of the vaccine to hide its danger. The side effects of the vaccine are scientifically documented in independent (not paid by the manufacturer) medical studies, including those carried out by Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld and others, which appeared in the book Vaccines and Autoimmunity, published in 2015 by Wiley-Blackwell.
For this reason, I interviewed the lawyer Monica Leon del Rio, who responded to us about the lawsuit:
What is the lawsuit filed against Merck Sharp and Dhome?
ML: The group action filed against the multinational Merck Sharp and Dhome on August 4, is basically an action that collects a group, the group of girls, adolescents and women who have been harmed by the adverse effects of the vaccine Against the human papilloma virus, Gardasil. The peculiarity of a group action such as this one is the dimension in the number of victims that make it up, the uniqueness of symptomatology and diagnosis of each victim. This action will develop a very little issue in Colombia that is called 'responsibility for defective product'.
Why did you have to come to this instance?
ML: In Colombia, as in all parts of the world, all the instances have been exhausted to be able to report the adverse effects produced by Gardasil. Neither the health authorities nor the members of the medical groups in the countries where the adverse effects have been reported nor the multinational manufacturer of the product have responded and permanently have stigmatized the victims by stating that they have no organic damage component And that it is a case of "psychogeny".
It is particular to see how the issue of psychogenesis is an issue that has been addressed in all parts where there have been significant adverse effects. We have the case of Japan, the United Kingdom, Denmark, the United States, and always the common element that the health authorities, permeated by the multinational that manufactures the product, has been to establish a theme of childhood illness when clinical histories are being presented to the authorities Perfectly documented on the autoimmune and neurological diseases of the minors.
Due to this circumstance in Colombia, from the beginning of my activity of social and judicial denunciation, the adverse effects, the tables with the medical histories of the minors were instated and presented to the national government, and this was not adequately answered and treatments were not established For girls. Guardianship actions have been filed in order to guarantee the constitutional right to health and have not been complied with.
Can you give us an example of a guardianship that has not been fulfilled in this case?
ML: For example, the tutelage of Carmen de Bolivar was a tutelage that was won before the Colombian Council of State, which is the highest contentious body, this tutela has already two years after the sentence was issued and the girls of Carmen de Bolivar Are part of this tutelage have not been given any treatment, or have been issued diagnosis, this worsens the health situation of children and diseases have been making significant progress, causing the death of many of them.
Can you expand the issue of demand for "defective product" a bit?
ML: This is a demand that has a peculiar component in responsibility, called "product liability." This responsibility takes place when a product that comes to the market, to which the consumer has access, in this case the consumers are the Colombian girls and adolescents, it generates damage because it is an unsafe product and this is going to be the probative debate, to demonstrate that Gardasil is an insecure product for hundreds or thousands of girls, not only in Colombia, but in the world.
What is the process of the lawsuit?
ML: A group action in Colombia is a preferred action, this means that it has to be processed quickly and agility. Due to the significant number of victims that make up the lawsuit, I imagine that the terms will be extended, but in principle the judge will consider whether or not to admit it, if he sees the requirements for admission and then we will enter a stage of notification to Merck Sharp and Dhome, who is the defendant, and later to a stage of conciliation and will follow the probatory stages with all the evidence that I have at this moment in my possession.
Can you tell us a little about how this system works in the United States?
ML: In the United States there is an adverse effects reporting system called VAERS, which collects (supposedly) all effects produced by all vaccines. What is striking is that the Gardasil vaccine has a disproportionate number of adverse effects compared to the other vaccines. Unlike the United States, fortunately in Colombia we have no legal impediment to sue the vaccine manufacturer, a circumstance that does happen in the US. Because thanks to a law passed by Congress in 1986, vaccine manufacturers can not be sued in that country by the victims, but these can be compensated by the government if it is proven that the vaccine caused them harm . This is a matter of objective and non-subjective liability, which means that regardless of whether or not they wanted to do damage, they must compensate for damages.
What other cases of lawsuits like this have been seen in the world?
ML: The most well-known case in the world against the vaccine manufacturer is Japan, where there is a lawsuit with a significant number of victims, more than 60 girls affected and has a strong evidence base, due to That the same Ministry of Health is the one that requires the creation of an interdisciplinary group to analyze the adverse effects on hundreds of Japanese girls and arrive at definitive conclusions regarding the diseases caused, such as orthostatic intolerance, pain syndrome Complex, and neurological diseases that we are also seeing in Colombian girls. They are the same diagnoses, the same symptomatology in two totally different countries, Japan and Colombia.
What has been the experience in Europe in cases like these?
ML: Recently a sentence has been issued by the European Court where an annotation is made regarding the obligation of the plaintiff against the burden of proof. It is obvious that the one who has the best condition to prove that he acted diligently is the manufacturer, is the multinational. This for obvious reasons: economic, scientific and of any order. What can be demonstrated from a judgment of this nature is that we have the victims, we have the medical records and we have perfectly documented diseases. The judge will have to decide whether it considers that sufficient evidence is sufficient to establish that the vaccine is not a safe vaccine.
How could Merck try to contradict a victim's testimony?
ML: It would be very difficult to show that there may be something directly unrelated to vaccine application here, since these girls in their previous medical records were healthy girls, and developed these diseases identical to those in Japan, Denmark , United States, Canada after being vaccinated. Undoubtedly, Colombian minors have been inoculated with Gardasil since 2013 and since that year began the symptoms and diagnosis of demyelinating diseases, neurological diseases and immunological diseases of the greatest severity that have unfortunately left six children dead in Colombia and many in the world.
Does the fact that compensation has been paid in the United States for the Gardasil vaccine is a history that can be used in this type of case?
ML: Definitely, the fact that compensation has been paid by the American compensation fund demonstrates that there is damage and not only the vaccine Gardasil, historically, multinational vaccine manufacturers have had to face similar lawsuits . That is why a law was created in the United States to prevent individuals from suing vaccine manufacturers, as the number of adverse reactions was alarming. We have, for example, the case of the polio vaccine, the so-called Cutter case, something similar to what is happening to us, where there were about 200 thousand children affected by polio disease, and there were a lot of people with disabilities for the rest of their lives and Were compensated. To protect the manufacturer, this system is created in the United States, which prevents the vaccine maker from being sued. We hope this does not happen in Colombia, because we can not continue to allow defective products like this to continue to circulate in the market, damaging consumers of nature and protection as special as Colombian girls and adolescents.
Are damages greater than the benefits of the Gardasil vaccine?
ML: We know that all products and all medicines can have adverse effects, but to what extent should a consumer have a disproportionate adverse effect such as the one being endured by hundreds of girls in Colombia and thousands in the world? This is where the difference between the proportional harm generated and an issue that is much debated in the medical and judicial aspects, which is the general good versus the individual, and damage that exceeds in proportion any property that is obliged to assume a Person in the collective. For Colombian girls, her legitimate expectation when applying Gardasil was to prevent a disease and we as mothers when we applied that vaccine, we wanted to protect girls in the future from a serious illness that they might never have acquired because it was not 100% sure that they would acquire A cancer of the cervix. That is why it breaks the legitimate expectations of the final consumer that are the girls, adolescents and Colombian women and creates the responsibility.
How many girls are affected in Colombia?
ML: By this date, August 2017 there are around a thousand girls affected nationally. After all the complaints filed in Colombia and because of all the adverse effects that have been reported, the percentage of application of Gardasil vaccine has dropped substantially in Colombia.
With this question we finished the interview. It remains in the hands of the judges that justice is done in this case or that a multinational that has been punished with fines for billions of dollars for corruption, get away with it. The history of Merck, the CDC (Center for Disease Control in the USA) and WHO (World Health Organization), is more like the history of the drug mafia than that of the struggle for health and well being human. The CDC, is proven, hid the relationship between vaccines and autism, WHO is the bait who also profits from these dangerous vaccines and also all these organizations gave the go-ahead to the adjuvant used in vaccines, aluminum, Which is a recognized neurotoxin that crosses the barriers of protection of the brain, accumulates in the same and begins to produce different types of neurological diseases that can end up killing the patients who previously enjoyed perfect health.
It is very telling that the mainstream media in this country have ignored this demand. It is not necessary to be very perceptive to know which side they are, certainly not on the health side of all these girls who languish without any help, since the government is cheaper to deny the truth than to repair the damage caused by its Big inoculated lie. This is David's fight against Goliath. Goliath has all the power of money and of the officials and scientists bought by thirty silver coins that swear and perjuran on the "benign vaccine". The plaintiffs have their bodies, bleeding, debilitated, sick, hopeless, stigmatized as proof that there was a before and after the vaccine. Justice has the floor.
===================================================================
3.) U.S. court pays $6 million to Gardasil victims
===================================================================
Source:http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/dec/31/us-court-pays-6-million-gardasil-victims/
By Peter Lind - - Wednesday, December 31, 2014
WASHINGTON, April 10, 2013 - Gardasil, the vaccine for HPV (human papillomavirus), may not be as safe as backers claim.
Judicial Watch announced it has received documents from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) revealing that its National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) has awarded $5,877,710 dollars to 49 victims in claims made against the highly controversial HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccines. To date 200 claims have been filed with VICP, with barely half adjudicated.
“This new information from the government shows that the serious safety concerns about the use of Gardasil have been well-founded. Public health officials should stop pushing Gardasil on children.” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
The CDC recommends the Gardasil vaccine, made by Merck Pharmaceuticals, for all females between 9 and 26 years to protect against HPV. Furthermore, the CDC says Gardasil is licensed, safe, and effective for males ages 9 through 26 years.
The facts appear to contradict the FDA’s safety statements. The adverse reaction reports detail 26 new deaths reported between September 1, 2010 and September 15, 2011 as well as incidents of seizures, paralysis, blindness, pancreatitis, speech problems, short term memory loss and Guillain-Barré Syndrome. The documents come from the FDA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) which is used by the FDA to monitor the safety of vaccines.
That’s 26 reported deaths of young, previously healthy, girls after Gardasil vaccination in just one year.
In response to the concern about death reports among those who received Gardasil, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) insists “there was no unusual pattern or clustering to the deaths that would suggest that they were caused by the vaccine.”
While it is not clear exactly what is causing so many adverse reactions, Gardasil does contain genetically engineered virus-like protein particles as well as aluminum, which can affect immune function.
Further, according to the vaccine manufacturer product information insert, “Gardasil … not been evaluated for carcinogenicity or impairment of fertility.” (2007 [227] p1986 )
In fact, Merck studied the Gardasil vaccine in fewer than 1,200 girls under 16 prior to it being released to the market under a fast-tracked road to licensure. To date, most of the serious side effects, including deaths, that occurred during the pre-licensure clinical trials and post marketing surveillance have been written off as a “coincidence” by Merck researchers and government health officials.
Neurologist Dr. Ian Sutton reported negative neurological side effects from Gardasil. He reported five cases of multiple sclerosis-like symptoms emerging shortly after women received the Gardasil vaccine, noting:
“We report five patients who presented with multifocal or atypical demyelinating syndromes within 21 days of immunization with the quadrivalent human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine, Gardasil. Although the target population for vaccination, young females, has an inherently high risk for MS, the temporal association with demyelinating events in these cases may be explained by the potent immuno-stimulatory properties of HPV virus-like particles which comprise the vaccine.”
From its inception, the use of HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccines for sexually transmitted diseases has been hotly disputed. According to the Annals of Medicine: “At present there are no significant data showing that either Gardasil or Cervarix (GlaxoSmithKline) can prevent any type of cervical cancer since the testing period employed was too short to evaluate long-term benefits of HPV vaccination.”
There are more than 100 types of human papillomaviruses (HPVs). Of them, about 40 types of HPV are sexually transmitted and 15 of these types are most associated with cervical cancers and genital warts in women and men.
HPV vaccines have been illegally administered to millions without informed consent, as the risks rarely disclosed.
Not only are there questions about the safety of the vaccine, there are questions about the need for the vaccine. Over 90 percent of women infected with HPV clear the infection naturally within two years, at which point cervical cells go back to normal.
Meanwhile, Merck is benefitting tremendously from vaccine sales. The vaccine is expected to reach $1 billion in sales next year, and could reach more than $4 billion in sales in five years, according to Wall Street analysts.
Dr. Peter Lind practices metabolic and neurologic chiropractic in his wellness clinic in Salem, Oregon. USA. He is the author of 3 books on health, one novel, and hundreds of wellness articles. His clinical specialty is in physical, nutritional, and emotional stress. He is virtual staff doctor for http://www.thealternativedaily.com/fructosetoxic.html
=======================================================================
4.) Two Cases of Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis Following Vaccination Against Human Papilloma Virus.
=======================================================================
Intern Med. 2016;55(21):3181-3184. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
Sekiguchi K1, Yasui N, Kowa H, Kanda F, Toda T.
Author information
1
Division of Neurology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Abstract
We herein present two cases of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) following vaccination against human papilloma virus (HPV). Case 1 experienced diplopia and developed an unstable gait 14 days after a second vaccination of Cervarix. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed an isolated small, demyelinating lesion in the pontine tegmentum. Case 2 experienced a fever and limb dysesthesia 16 days after a second vaccination of Gardasil. Brain MRI revealed hyperintense lesion in the pons with slight edema on a T2-weighted image. Both cases resolved completely. It is important to accumulate further data on confirmed cases of ADEM temporally associated with HPV vaccination.
=======================================================================
3.) Sanofi sued in France over Gardasil vaccine
=======================================================================
November 24, 2013 / 1:42 PM / 4 years ago
Source: Reuters Staff
BORDEAUX (Reuters) - A French teenager has filed a lawsuit against French pharmaceutical company Sanofi Pasteur (SASY.PA) and France’s health regulators, her lawyer said on Sunday, over side-effects they say were caused by the Gardasil anti-cervical cancer vaccine.
The lawsuit filed on Friday in Bobigny outside Paris says Sanofi and health regulators violated “obvious safety obligations and breached the principles of precaution and prevention.”
The plaintiff’s lawyer, Jean-Christophe Coubris, who is based in Bordeaux, said his now 18-year-old client was 15 when she received two injections of Gardasil, which is made by Merck (MRK.N) and sold in Europe by Sanofi.
Within months she was hospitalized for multiple sclerosis, he said.
“She temporarily lost her sight and the use of her legs,” Coubris said in a statement.
Coubris also represents victims of the Mediator scandal, in which officials blame the anti-diabetes drug made by Servier Laboratories for at least 500 deaths in France.
Sanofi said in a statement that studies in France and around the world have found no increased risk of multiple sclerosis linked to Gardasil.
"As the scientific literature underlines, the fact that a illness appears after a vaccine is administered does not mean that the vaccine caused this illness," it said.
Sanofi said studies showed that cases of multiple sclerosis in young people occur at the same rate whether or not they have been vaccinated with Gardasil.
=======================================================================
5.) HPV Vaccine: Death in Spain / April 16, 2017
======================================================================
JUSTICE RECOGNIZES WHAT HEALTH AUTHORITIES DO NOT WANT TO RECOGNIZE
Source:http://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccine-death-spain/
By Alicia Capilla, Guest Author
The High Court of Justice of Asturias- Spain (TSJA) has condemned the Asturian Health System for the death of Andrea, a young Spanish girl who died in September 2012 after getting the second shot of the HPV vaccine. The Court recognizes the bad practice of the hospitals of Jove and Cabueñes, since they did not diagnose the pathology before the second shot of the vaccine was supplied which caused the death of the young woman.
AAVP President, Alicia Capilla
Andrea was a young woman with a medical history of mild episodes of bronchial asthma. When she got the first shot of the HPV vaccine on July 23, 2012, she became with headache and breathing difficulty. Although, she suffered from severe asthmatic exarcebation, she got the second shot on August 23, 2012, with a sudden worsening. As a result of this, she suffered severe dyspnea and seizures only 12 hours after receiving the vaccine. She was moved to the Maternal and Child Hospital of the HUCA where she remained in the Pediatric Intensity Care Unit until she died on 8 September.
The judicial sentence acknowledges that there is a casual link with the vaccine, between the second shot and her death, despite the fact that at the trial, the Administration took advantage of the fact that the vaccine is fully endorsed by drug regulatory agencies throughout the country and that the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) –with regard to this case reporting- determined that there was insufficient evidence to suggest a causal association with the vaccine. The paradox of this study and its lack of scientific rigor is clear as the Committee agreed to maintain an investigation on the signal.
The Association of Affected People in Spain by the Human Papillomus Virus Vaccine (AAVP) has been demanding since 2009 many other cases of affected victims collected in our database. We have repeatedly called on the Health Authorities of Spain to recognize adverse reactions, documented many of them in the HPV vaccines databases, in the European Medicines Agency (EMA) databases, in the Spain one and in the HPV scientific literature. Andrea´s case in not unique. There are at least five more reports of deaths collected in the database of the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Sanitary Products, for not mentioning all the reports collected in the EMA database. In spite of all this, the Health Authorities and the Pharmaceutical Company continues to deny recognition of any adverse reaction. The most regrettable of all is that they blame the young women in their adverse state of health, stigmatizing them and referring all this to psychological problems, a matter which of course lacks any scientific basis, since no epidemiological studies which prove the causality of the adverse reactions experienced by many young women and the vaccine, have been carried out in Spain.
We regret once again the poor performance of the Health Authorities that are not carrying out an adequate evaluation and monitoring system, as well as looking elsewhere instead of looking after the health of girls and young women who have had the misfortune to suffer adverse reactions as a result of a Public Health policy that seems to defend more economic and political interests than health ones. We must not forget that this immunization is applied to healthy young people and it is also in its implementation phase, so that Pharmacovigilance systems should act with due diligence and responsibility.
We are pleased that for the first time in Spain, in court, the causal link of an adverse reaction with the HPV vaccine is recognized. We show our support to Andrea´s family, because despite their misfortune they have been supported by a judicial sentence that finally protects them. It was time for justice!
Alicia Capilla
President AAVP
Source:www.aavp.es
asociacion.aavp@gmail.com
=======================================================================
6.) New Death Post-Gardasil Updated VAERS Figures & Report that HPV Vaccines Adverse Reactions are 50% Higher than other Age- Related Recommended Vaccines
=======================================================================
Source:http://sanevax.org/new-death-post-gardasil-updated-vaers-figures-report-that-hpv-vaccines-adverse-reactions-are-50-higher-than-other-age-related-recommended-vaccines/
Mother of Injured Gardasil Girl Demands
Gardasil’s ‘New Medical Conditions’ Be Legitimized as
Post-Gardasil Syndrome (PGS) & Post-Cervarix Syndrome (PCS)
By Leslie Carol Botha, Vice President of Public Relations
November 29, 2011
One would think the world is facing a cervical cancer epidemic with the amount of money being exchanged and laws changed to make sure the potentially dangerous HPV vaccines and the rDNA contaminated Gardasil become front and center in global consumer markets. One must also be starting to question the hidden agendas behind this world-wide vaccination program.
Kind of slick and sly for the global media to announce on the U.S. Thanksgiving Day that Gardasil will make its debut in the UK by September 2012. Merck’s marketing department shows no thoughtfulness or integrity towards the parents of dead and injured Gardasil children to break this news on a traditional holiday with damaged families trying to count their blessings while battling the feelings of anger, frustration, betrayal, and powerlessness they now live with daily.
Updated VAERS Data
According to SANE Vax Inc. VAERS Researcher, Janny Stokvis, there has been another increase in adverse injuries and deaths from the HPV vaccines since the last report issued in August. Data below for HPV 2 Cervarix & HPV 4 Gardasil adverse reactions (estimated 1 to 10% of the vaccine injured population reporting) as of October 11 with significant category increases compared to August 11, 2011:
HPV Vaccines
Year 2.011 October August
===============================
Disabled 780 763
Deaths 104 103
Did Not Recover 4,898 4,777
Abnormal Pap Smear 467 430
Cervical Dysplasia 177 157
Cervical Cancer 41 41
Life Threatening 457 444
Emergency Room Visit 9,312 9,115
Hospitalized 2,335 2,307
Extended Hospital stay 208 201
Serious 3,155 3,111
Total Adverse Events 23,982 23,388
ONE MORE GIRL
VAERS ID 437735 shows that on July 6, 2011, an 18 year old girl from Massachusetts died 84 days after receiving two shots of Gardasil:
Relapse of ITP: 18 year-old female with immune thrombocytopenic purpura, diagnosed in 1995 and in remission from 2004 to 2011 following treatment with Rituximab. Relapse in early April, 2011, followed administration of Gardasil vaccine on 10-26-10 and 1-7-11. Relapse of ITP led eventually to death from intracranial hemorrhage on 07/06/2011.
According to MedScape Reference: “Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is a clinical syndrome in which a decreased number of circulating platelets (thrombocytopenia) manifests as a bleeding tendency, easy bruising (purpura), or extravasation of blood from capillaries into skin and mucous membranes (petechiae).” 1.
VAERS reports that the parents noted the petechiae event sometime in April, however, when tested, the girl’s lab diagnostics showed that the blood work was within normal range:
CBC on 04/26/2011 included platelet count 5000; WBC 5.4 with normal differential, Hgb 12.8, Hct 37.2, MCV 87.9; normal RBC morphology. 2.
SANE Vax Inc. is demanding an investigation into the death of an already immune-comprised teen girl who received Gardasil when the safety and efficacy data is based on clinical trials on healthy girls.3. What was the mechanism of action that caused her death from an intracranial hemorrhage?
HPV Vaccines – More than Double Vaccine Reactions than all other Recommended Vaccinations
In August, Steven Rubin posted disturbing data in VAERS showing that for the ‘CDC-recommended vaccines for 7-18-year-olds, HPV vaccine injuries were greater than others in that group.’ Rubin compiled the data below for the two age groups 0 – 6 and 7 – 18 showing the approximate numbers of reported adverse injuries from only the recommended vaccines for that age group.
Rubin notes “…..children age 0-6 years are reporting the most VAERS events following a DTP vaccination. Children ages 7-18 years are significantly affected by the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. Note that HPV is already associated with over 100 deaths, and is not limited to girls (there are three reports of boys who have died following an HPV vaccination). This is not the most widely given vaccination for 7-18 year olds, but it appears frequently in VAERS and is associated with serious adverse effects.4.
Gardasil Victim’s Mother Demands Naming Gardasil ‘New Medical Conditions’
Deanna Martinez, mother of Shelby, age 17; who Martinez calls a “Gardasil Victim because she suffers from adverse reactions to this killer drug every day,” had her first and only Gardasil shot on March 31, 2011 and has been ill ever since. Martinez contacted Norma Erickson, President of SANE Vax Inc. via email to express her frustration and concerns that the Gardasil children are afflicted with a ‘nameless condition,’ instead of an official primary diagnosis. She wrote:
“Of course, there is the familiar and vague ‘adverse reaction to the Gardasil vaccine’ or worse ‘possible adverse reaction to the Gardasil vaccine’ or ‘condition of unknown etiology’ which no one understands and few believe in. There are other diagnoses for conditions that result from the adverse reaction to Gardasil — Lupus, neuropathy, migraines, chronic fatigue…of unknown etiology-you know that the endless list goes on and on. However, these are all SECONDARY conditions and diagnoses!
“In order for our children’s illnesses to be legitimized and ultimately a cure or treatment to be found we must have an official primary diagnosis. And that primary diagnosis must officially and directly be tied to the Gardasil injection. It MUST have a name! Furthermore, a treatment protocol must be designed. We must no longer settle for a nameless condition with no standard of treatment.
“I am sure that at different times we all call our kids’ illness different names. I believe that it makes their illness less believable, even and sometimes especially, for them. It makes their voices smaller. It makes their lives harder. It sends the wrong message to the world. It does not further their cause.
“Just think, if your child had Diabetes would you tell people that they had an adverse reaction to sugar? If your child had asthma would you just say they had an adverse reaction to allergens in the air? We need to name our kids’ illness.
“Because we have already had to do so much of the research and treatment and lifesaving for our children on our own, let’s not wait for the medical community, the drug company or the government to come up with an official diagnosis name. Let’s determine a name for their condition on our own! Let’s all call it one condition. Let’s use it in our daily lives with our child, our doctors, our family and friends, in our correspondence, on our websites, in our emails, everywhere. Let’s give our kids some power back by legitimizing their illness. Let’s get the word out that our kids really are sick and their sickness has a name-it’s legitimate!”
SANE Vax Inc. agrees with Martinez’s astute observations – and we support her demand that adverse reactions from the HPV vaccines not only be named but used universally by medical consumers, educators, researchers, medical professionals, government health agencies, politicians and the media.
SANE Vax Inc. is announcing from this time forward adverse reactions from Merck’s HPV 4 Gardasil now be known as Post-Gardasil Syndrome (PGS) and GlaxoSmithKline’s HPV 2 Cervarix be known as Post-Cervarix Syndrome (PCS).
PGS & PCS will be applied to the reported adverse conditions from the HPV vaccines whose symptoms include but are not limited to the following conditions:
Post Gardasil Syndrome & Post-Cervarix Syndrome Adverse Reactions SEE: graphic
Parents and advocates around the world are uniting to stop this global vaccine program threatening the lives and health of their adolescent children. If you know of someone who already suffers from PGS or PCS, please have them contact SANE Vax Inc. at info@sanevax.org. Governments of the world need to know medical consumers are now demanding safe, affordable, effective and necessary vaccinations. Gardasil does not meet any of the above requirements. Governments of the world must also be held accountable for damaging the health and well being of the children of their constituents.
========================================================================
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
Tu comentario será objeto de revisión y luego aprobado.
Your comment will be revised and then approved.